Well you have got me. I was using a close to cueball bridge with a closed bridge as to an open bridge.mnorwood said:I have read and heard arguments for a close bridge or a long bridge to gain maximum draw. I would like to hear arguments for one or both approaches.
poolplayer2093 said:3 inches............
PunchOut said:lol :thumbup:
mnorwood, are you forcefollow on youtube?
jsp said:The equation for obtaining maximum draw is simple and involves only two things. The cue tip should hit the CB as low as possible and the cue tip should be traveling as fast as possible, all without miscuing. That's all. Bridge length comes into the equation only to the extent as how much it affects tip placement and speed.
A longer bridge might help you obtain greater cue tip velocity on impact (assuming a constant cue acceleration and that stroke length is in proportion to bridge length). However, a shorter bridge might help you in tip placement accuracy such that you more reliably hit the CB as low as possible without miscuing.
Precise cue tip placement is definitely harder to achieve than a high cue tip velocity. So for a beginner, I would recommend a shorter bridge length to obtain greater draw.
PistolPat said:Either one works ONLY if you have a long stroke, the further you push through the cb the more draw you will get. You can get great results with a short length stroke but a long stroke really gets that cue ball moving. Massey reveals that HIS secret on power drawing is keeping the wrist loose and snapping it foward in the stroke. works like a charm
PistolPat said:Either one works ONLY if you have a long stroke, the further you push through the cb the more draw you will get. You can get great results with a short length stroke but a long stroke really gets that cue ball moving. Massey reveals that HIS secret on power drawing is keeping the wrist loose and snapping it foward in the stroke. works like a charm
mnorwood said:I have read and heard arguments for a close bridge or a long bridge to gain maximum draw. I would like to hear arguments for one or both approaches.
I also agree with both Joe and Mike.mikepage said:I agree with Joe. A consequence of this is for the really best players amongst us, a bridge length close to their own-break shot bridge length might give them maximum draw. This is the bridge length that evidently gives them maximum speed with control. For many of the rest of us, the quality of our tip placement deteriorates more rapidly with bridge length and our optimal bridge length for maximum draw would be shorter. For new players it would be very short, imo.jsp said:The equation for obtaining maximum draw is simple and involves only two things. The cue tip should hit the CB as low as possible and the cue tip should be traveling as fast as possible, all without miscuing. That's all. Bridge length comes into the equation only to the extent as how much it affects tip placement and speed.
A longer bridge might help you obtain greater cue tip velocity on impact (assuming a constant cue acceleration and that stroke length is in proportion to bridge length). However, a shorter bridge might help you in tip placement accuracy such that you more reliably hit the CB as low as possible without miscuing.
Precise cue tip placement is definitely harder to achieve than a high cue tip velocity. So for a beginner, I would recommend a shorter bridge length to obtain greater draw.