Like many people, I've always admired the man's 9-ball game. I had never seen Buddy play 1-p, though, until a couple of years ago (2004, I believe) in the DCC. Considering Buddy's reputation for inhuman cueball control, great ball-pocketing ability, and overall careful, deliberate play, I would have expected him to be an absolute terror at one-pocket. That is, if he enjoyed the game enough to actually play it.
The DCC match I saw was against Efren, and I found the match to be pretty amazing and yet pretty disappointing at the same time. Efren wins 3-0, no huge surprise, but what I thought was amazing was that Buddy beat Efren to the shot in every single rack! And these were not just "sucker" openings, either, these were pretty major sellouts on Efren's part; maybe someone else who saw the match can chime in and back me up on this. In each game, Buddy was the first to encounter a high % shot at his hole with several other balls in play; the kind of situation where you expect a guy to do major damage, maybe even get all 8. The kind of situation where, if it's Efren shooting, you just automatically think "oh, he's out". Unfortunately, however, Buddy was just not hitting them well that day, and he failed to capitilize on each of these opportunities. That was the disappointing part, because, while I like both guys, and didn't really care who won, I was hoping Buddy would give Efren a run for his money.
My question is this: did Buddy ever really get into one-pocket seriously, particularly during the period when he was playing 9-ball as well as anyone on the planet? Also, if Buddy was somewhat of a one-pocket player at that time, how did he stack up against the guys who would have been considered the one-pocket specialists of the time?
Thanks for the info,
Aaron
The DCC match I saw was against Efren, and I found the match to be pretty amazing and yet pretty disappointing at the same time. Efren wins 3-0, no huge surprise, but what I thought was amazing was that Buddy beat Efren to the shot in every single rack! And these were not just "sucker" openings, either, these were pretty major sellouts on Efren's part; maybe someone else who saw the match can chime in and back me up on this. In each game, Buddy was the first to encounter a high % shot at his hole with several other balls in play; the kind of situation where you expect a guy to do major damage, maybe even get all 8. The kind of situation where, if it's Efren shooting, you just automatically think "oh, he's out". Unfortunately, however, Buddy was just not hitting them well that day, and he failed to capitilize on each of these opportunities. That was the disappointing part, because, while I like both guys, and didn't really care who won, I was hoping Buddy would give Efren a run for his money.
My question is this: did Buddy ever really get into one-pocket seriously, particularly during the period when he was playing 9-ball as well as anyone on the planet? Also, if Buddy was somewhat of a one-pocket player at that time, how did he stack up against the guys who would have been considered the one-pocket specialists of the time?
Thanks for the info,
Aaron