ElCorazonFrio
Banned
kindness and honesty count! I tip my hat to all involved for talking to one another.
KD
Really? Guy says something finally and the usual suspects come out to hold a parade. He hasn't even actually done anything yet.
kindness and honesty count! I tip my hat to all involved for talking to one another.
KD
Time table needs to be explained Mr. Showman???
10/24/14 take job
11/26/14 due date
12/25/14 revised due date
1/26/15 re-revised due date
3/1/15 re-re-revised due date
4/30/15 re-re-re-revised due date
5/20/15 re-re-re-re-revised due date
9/30/15 re-re-re-re-re-revised due date
Today
I am sorry but "UNILATERALLY" changing the verbal contract is 100% illegal!!! Quality Cues and Mike never agreed to your modifications to the due date. Original due date is/was 11/26/14 and once you retain possession beyond what the owner Mike agreed to constitutes theft in my opinion. You are technically in possession of his property fraudulently because you "Contractually" agreed to return his property on 11/26/14 failing to return the item and breaching the contract you entered into deprives the owner of its use and utility and allows "YOU" access to its use and utility. Use and utility is a primary principle of ownership and via your actions you have converted the cues use and utility from the owner to yourself!
KD
Should Showman return the cue? Yes
Is being slow illegal? No
Should Showman return the cue? Yes
Is being slow illegal? No
Really? Guy says something finally and the usual suspects come out to hold a parade. He hasn't even actually done anything yet.
Well at this point in time I can say that if there is no one else that has an issue, I think that is acceptable. Not that I have low standards but everyone I know has dropped the ball at least once in their career including myself...
John Showman finally showed up........and has the spine to face his accusers.........long overdue but way to go John...........
Let's not dredge up all the details of every complaint........simply post and say you sent John the details and mention the date and time........come back and let us know the problem is being worked on and then when resolved, come back again and let us know how things turned out......were you ultimately made happy......did you get your cue back........really, that's all that matters.
As far as John Showman, any of us can have our worlds turned upside down and shaken vigorously. Sometimes it takes a long time for things to settle down where you can regain control over your life and when you do get control again, all too often your life has permanently changed as a result of it.
We're not entitled to know what caused John to have issues with his customers......only his customers deserve to know any details........the only thing that matters is that John is willing, interested and prepared to make things right with his clients........you can't change history but you can pay more attention to the current state of affairs which John appears to be doing.
Mr. Showman, the fact that you are attempting to restore your reputation on the Forum impresses me a lot and I've admired your cue-making for years.....if it wasn't for California's pending AB-96 legislation, I'd be willing to trust you with my wallet if you do the right thing with your clients that have a gripe with you......it takes a big man to ask people to post their complaints for all to see.....again, not necessary......just want to see posts from your accusers saying things are now okay.....that's all that matters.
Matt B.
p.s. Mike, I think you have a gorgeous Showman cue........it's exactly the type Showman design I would want.
At what point does it become theft in your eyes? Obviously being deprived for a year or more of his property, worth in excess of $7K doesn't meet your standard. And without this thread, a resolution wasn't ever forthcoming. Or perhaps Mike should've just taken Showman at his word, that at some unspecified date in the future he would return it?
As consumers, we can't enable this despicable behavior.
It is theft if the guy asks for his cue back and Showman refuses. It isn't a crime if he is simply slow/disorganized/sick/old/etc. Is there a hard copy legally binding contract stating an exact date when Showman will finish the cue? He used to finish 4 to 6 cues a month. Now he finishes 4 to 6 a year. If it is a crime to slow down as you age a lot of us would be locked up.
When Kevin Varney was dying and in the hospital for months at a time he was accused of a lot of stuff on this forum because he wasn't getting work done. Was he a criminal?
I
Your request is:
could whoever been ripped off by showman cues post here
I say we all have.
What a drama filled circus.
Threads are all over the board like some kind of rash.
LOL
Where am I supporting him? I said in multiple places he is 100% wrong. I would consider going from no communication and threats of police to a conversation and Mike graciously offering him time to finish the work is working towards settling the situation.Perfect?
They didn't work anything out to get it settled. They worked something out so the guy who lied gets to feel no repercussions for his actions.
Guy says he has 8-10hrs left on the cue? That means that it can be done today, right?
Or did he mean that he has 8hrs of work and six months of waiting?
I expect this cue won't be returned until the calendar reads 2016.
I know he is your friend, but that is exactly why you shouldn't publicly support him when he is clearly wrong.
If someone dies in possession of your money or belongings, the family does not inherit them???
If the person runs up a huge amount of debt while on their death bed, the family does not get their inheritance without subtracting the debt.
His business and creditors are entitled to what ever can be salvaged to reimburse those affected customers and any judge would intercede on behalf of those to facilitate the return of deposits and items for repair.
I do not understand your "Logic" this is the second post regarding what an outrage it is and you persist that "deadlines" are irrelevant and craftsman can be as late and as slow as possible with no consequences.
Fact is, a contract has to have certain terms regarding payment and dates of completion . They must also be entered into by mentally competent people. Contracts can be written and verbal . The contract is nullified if it does not have a due date. The judge is going to ascertain what the agreed date of completion was/is and find the person in possession of the property in breach of contract. The deposit and cue go back to the original owner as the work was never completed to retain the payment.
KD
I'm with ya on this. Countless threads by the OP about not getting his cue and nothing but excuses from the cue maker. Then countless nonsensical posts by the cue maker with excuses and no response to any of the accusations. After a 10-minute phone call, no doubt filled with more ecusess (life, health issues) OP is now satisfied that the SAME guy is going to follow through, Then OP posts in all threads all is well, nothing to see here.
In fairness to the readers of this forum all of those threads should be deleted because if they spend a considerable chunk of time reading all that drama only to get to the last page of each thread and read "Nevermind" they are gonna be ticked.
Where am I supporting him? I said in multiple places he is 100% wrong. I would consider going from no communication and threats of police to a conversation and Mike graciously offering him time to finish the work is working towards settling the situation.
Do you want the OP to get his cue back or do you just want John ran into the mud until you get bored? Call John all the names you want. Never buy a cue from him. Tell all your friends. None of that does anything to help the OP get his cue.
John is my friend and he screwed up. I want him to make it right. I called him and talked to him about the deal to see if there was anything I could do to help get it resolved. How does that make me a bad guy? Or do you just so want to be outraged that a resolution would be a let down for you?
EDIT: I had written something here but it served no useful purpose. I just want to see this situation end up with Mike getting his cue back and John moving forward.
Where am I supporting him? I said in multiple places he is 100% wrong. I would consider going from no communication and threats of police to a conversation and Mike graciously offering him time to finish the work is working towards settling the situation.
Do you want the OP to get his cue back or do you just want John ran into the mud until you get bored? Call John all the names you want. Never buy a cue from him. Tell all your friends. None of that does anything to help the OP get his cue.
John is my friend and he screwed up. I want him to make it right. I called him and talked to him about the deal to see if there was anything I could do to help get it resolved. How does that make me a bad guy? Or do you just so want to be outraged that a resolution would be a let down for you?
EDIT: I had written something here but it served no useful purpose. I just want to see this situation end up with Mike getting his cue back and John moving forward.