This question is for those of you that have taken the ProOne class from Stan, and are having great success with it. Is all the info that Stan presented to you on the video? In one post, a poster stated that he believes that everything needed to master ProOne is on the video. But the question is, is everything there? Something that might seem unimportant to some, might just be a key element for someone else to learn the system. Like many others, I feel that the difficulty, lies with getting in the correct alignment with A,B, and C. I have been getting some success, by aligning, the way another AZer posted, that he does, but I am just not sure, that it is the correct way. If you can think of anything that might make a difference, but for some reason, do not wish to post it, please send me a PM. At first I did not understand Perfect Aim, but with Gene's help, and not giving up, I got it down, and I will do the same with ProOne.
Cte
- Thread starter jamesroberts
- Start date
thats a pretty cool video, thanks I learned a lot
All these guys in this thread that dispute just to dispute are prolly apa 3's that are mad cuz they are not very good and they dont know how to get better
Phone Stan, as you did with Gene!! Stan would be more than happy to answer your questions!!
Banks
Banned
You forgot, *Individual results may vary.
I'll say it again.. don't really care one way or another about CTE, I'm just tired of the relentless bombardment by certain people. Joey's business is marketing, so that explains his repetitive postings. Pablo, on the other hand, just joined in what, November? Nearly all of his posts have been CTE related and he called Dr. Dave a fraud and questioned his credentials as a "Dr.". Am I not to think that is somewhat suspect?
Landon showed this on the dvd. He jumps using cte, pretty easy.
Im not trying to sell anything or in the market for a product.
The theme of my original post was just; how are people doing that have learned cte.
I didnt ask for a bunch of people to tell me something is not true when I see it with my own eyes
I am hitting certain shots with the CTE system absolutely pure, its kind of a joke, its given a huge confidence boost thats hard to put into words.
Ive got more swagger than the 80's hurricanes......lol
I would say that jumping the ball is amazing, now if im hooked after the break I never push, I just fire
This is so very comical lol
Yes Pj we all know the user makes all the decisions and the system doesn't make them for us :speechless: By you religiously staying on these couple points and you keep shoving down peoples throats over and over again tells anyone thats knowledgeable with cte that you virtually know nothing about it. You try and shoot down other peoples points but then add nothing other than its feel or you new favorite word "user driven" Maybe Banks can point out any points PJ has claimed to have made in all these threads, i have counted zero still? Pj you struck out at the plate on three strait pitches, sit back and learn and ask and not tell.
Yes Pj we all know the user makes all the decisions and the system doesn't make them for us :speechless: By you religiously staying on these couple points and you keep shoving down peoples throats over and over again tells anyone thats knowledgeable with cte that you virtually know nothing about it. You try and shoot down other peoples points but then add nothing other than its feel or you new favorite word "user driven" Maybe Banks can point out any points PJ has claimed to have made in all these threads, i have counted zero still? Pj you struck out at the plate on three strait pitches, sit back and learn and ask and not tell.
Last edited:
Glad to hear that.
Been lurking these threads for a while, but time to jump in and swim with the sharks.
The problem is, the guys who fight so hard against it, haven't even tried it. So, their arguments have no basis. They just speculate and apparently have too much time on their hands. Until they try it, then I would tell them to kiss off.
Professional pool players control the cueball like yoyos.
David Howard once said the pros know where that cueball is going to about within 3 degrees.
If they know where the cueball is going after collision, I would think they also know where the object ball is going after collision.
But see, that's the problem... 'however it works, it's producing valid shot lines' (emphasis, and color, added).
That is precisely why I, for one, would not be able to even try it. I would be totally hung up on having to know. And I have yet to hear, or hear of, anyone offering a repeatable, and geometrically sound explanation of 'how it works'. That is a requirement for me.
Is 'it' producing valid shot lines? How would I know?
And also, just to go on record, I know some of you have heartburn with PJ, but frankly, his powers of elucidation on this matter make him my touchstone for deciding what to believe or not.
So, pound away...
Oh, yeah... lest I forget, Dr. Dave is another one that I will look to for a rigorous verification. And, furthermore, anyone who disrespects him or his body of work immediately loses credibility (with me, at least).
can you tell me any point,information,etc Pj has made in his last 200 post about cte, im just curious? Pj was a step ahead of people who new nothing about cte before the dvd came out but now he is a few steps behind because he was unable to understand the system and the dvd but he is still trying to hold on to that "knowledgeable cte position" he once had. This is the reason he can only say "Feel" or critic "Stans instructions" or the word "Exact" and cant not discuss anything else about cte/pro1.
Last edited:
Dave is a chump! He's only out for self gain!! Bottom line!! You know what his motto is To steal Ideas from one person is Plagiarism and to steal from many is research. Go blow smoke somewhere else!!
Sounds "exactly" like something GetMeThere would say.
I have seen some of the Dr's work. I think he went by the name Robert Byrnes at the time though.
Depends what you mean by "as advertised". If you mean it helps some users to aim better, I agree (and always have, although you guys keep forgetting that). But if you mean it describes complete systematic steps that can be followed without user correction or "steering", then I don't agree.
How many more times do you estimate I'll have to say this before at least one of you understands it?
pj
chgo
then you should take 2 weeks off and quit, unless you are content with how you play
See this is typical Pj response
he is unable to prove my post wrong as usual lol i have asked others now to help him prove me wrong. From my post below all you get is the answer above.can you tell me any point,information,etc Pj has made in his last 200 post about cte, im just curious? Pj was a step ahead of people who new nothing about cte before the dvd came out but now he is a few steps behind because he was unable to understand the system and the dvd but he is still trying to hold on to that "knowledgeable cte position" he once had. This is the reason he can only say "Feel" or critic "Stans instructions" or the word "Exact" and cant not discuss anything else about cte/pro1.
Last edited:
I see.
How you see will have different results than another that sees differently.
These lines of aim are not really there but are imagined/perceived and stored. My hat is off to those that can walk into a shot from a standing position and know the aiming lines that get him to the ghost ball.
"As the eyes of humans and other animals are in different positions on the head, they present different views simultaneously. This is the basis of stereopsis, the process by which the brain exploits the parallax due to the different views from the eye to gain depth perception and estimate distances to objects.[3] Animals also use motion parallax, in which the animals (or just the head) move to gain different viewpoints. For example, pigeons (whose eyes do not have overlapping fields of view and thus cannot use stereopsis) bob their heads up and down to see depth."