skins said:there are some not so recognized great makers out there so what would any of you consider an acceptable annual production for a "great" makers cue to be deemed "collectible"?
Collectible is a choice by the cuebuyer. I might buy a Tascarella to play with, while Marcus would buy it to collect; ie make collectible. So maybe Pete makes 25 cues a year (number just for point) to some people they maybe collectible, to some people they are still to be played with. Also I don't think numbers play into it that much. If a guy made one cue a year that was crappy, it wouldn't be as collectible to someone that collects South Wests where the annual production is sometimes over 200.
(I intentionally am omitting anniversary type cues, and high end one offs, that could be considered collectible)
skins said:i'm also curious to opinions as to the determination that a makers status has reached "great/collectible"?
The market ie; availability, wait, perception by the masses, secondary market pricing.
JV