"How To Not Be Useless" buy it on Amazon and try to learn how to be a productive person.Therapy John, look into it.
Dale(terminating the troll feeding)
"How To Not Be Useless" buy it on Amazon and try to learn how to be a productive person.Therapy John, look into it.
Dale(terminating the troll feeding)
In the immortal words of Bob Uecker's character, just a biiit outtsideee.Bill was jerking your chain a bit with exaggeration, though he did charge $300/shaft and did throw away a lot of shafts to only stock good ones. 75% is a stretch, though. 50% might be closer to accurate, and not uncommon among top tier builders.
60,000 shafts to get only 300 good ones is a bit more of a stretch, in my somewhat educated opinion. That's .5% yield. John, you don't believe that, do you? That would be like you entirely buying out the Fort Worth Stockyards auction just so you could make one run of the mill case. Somebody's blowing smoke. If beginning with high grade logs, which given the projected product they should be, the yield of top grade shafts will average 30%. The only way to make his statement true is if they are starting with junk logs, which obviously will never produce a good shaft. If the log isn't straight, then neither is the grain inside it. That would make horrible business sense because it still requires the exact same machine operations, so I highly doubt that's the case. If that guy is willing to pay for 60,000 shafts to get 300 good ones, then send him my way. I will supply his 300 good shafts for half the cost, and he won't have to dispose of 59,600 junkers :thumbup:
Wrong. Bill might not have been telling me the truth but I can't possibly know it any more than I know if Eric's numbers are accurate. I choose to believe both of them.In the immortal words of Bob Uecker's character, just a biiit outtsideee.
Wrong. Bill might not have been telling me the truth but I can't possibly know it any more than I know if Eric's numbers are accurate. I choose to believe both of them.
Just like I choose to believe Kaz Miki, Nelson Tsai, Royce Bunnell and the many others I know in this business whom over 25 years have shared their knowledge and open their shops.
What exactly have you contributed to the questions posed? You opinion that no modern production cue is as good as 80's Schon and Adam cues.
Sounds like the opinion of a hack with a bias to me.
I will put my trust in guys who have far more knowledge and experience than you Joey.
Which one of them said the production cues today are more consistent than the 80's Schon and Adam in playability ? NOT 40 or 50 years ago, 25 YEARS AGO.Originally Posted by luke View Post
Would it be reasonable to conclude that today's new production cues are better in terms of consistent playability than older(25yrs) cues?
Son don't get bent out of shape.Which one of them said the production cues today are more consistent than the 80's Schon and Adam in playability ? NOT 40 or 50 years ago, 25 YEARS AGO.
And if they did, they can't prove it . PLAYABILITY iS SUBJECTIVE.
Hello.
Your opinion is biased as you worked for a factory. And you're in China where they produce millions of production cues.
I have no bias . My bias is I shot with those cues at a friend's house and seeing Runde-era blanks with really dense maple. I've shot with another older Schon that had nerves in it. That was before they changed the joint.
The Schon of the late 80's and 90's are coveted by collectors and players.
The ebony full-slice Adam was a monster too. It'd cost too much to make now I think.
If you don't think they are not MORE CONSISTENT IN PLAYABILITY than the production cues today, so be it .
That's your opinion.
If you think the cored and sectional Mezz now HIT BETTER than the ebony full-splice Adam, THAT'S YOUR OPINION. NOT A FACT.
Your story about 300 out of 6,000 shafts is the one I referred as just a bit outside. Sorry, I ain't debating it and don't believe it . If it's true, it's even worse b/c it reflects bad on the supplier .
Is SW now better than SW 25 years ago ?
Big pin Tad players' have been out for decades. Is the new one going to be better .
AND IN YOU'RE REALLY INCLINED TO DO IT.
Prove to me Mezz today have better resonance and feel than the full-splce Adam cue.
Then prove to me Pechauer cues have better resonance and feel the Runde-era Schon.
Meaning , you have no proof .
And more spin from you because you're stuck.
I think you've been a communist too long.
Nice quote on Chris.
He was talking coring. Not playability .
Looks like your reading needs help.
You gonna quote the pope next ?
Nice dowel story . Cow poop.
I think so too ( 25 yr old models ).I would bet no one on here could tell the difference of hit,play or even identity of the old sw and the new in a blind test
Haha. More reaching from a hack. If it weren't for az billiards no one outside your zip code would know your name and most players inside it wouldn't either.More spin from the man who was caught cheating
on camera and by witnesses.
Simple question , no answer.
" I could tell you , but I'd have to kill you."
Speaking of slime-ball con artists, there was this case maker who sold cases at a back of a truck at below retail all over the place after securing dealership. Thereby cutting down his own dealers.
Proof of what? That you're a hack.... That's just my opinion based on your words, displayed ignorance and your hobby cues.And still no proof from the communist.
More name calling? Come on Joey you can do better.The communist slime ball is stuck.
Spin, spin, spin.
I would have yo dismantle the playground and wouldn't find one shaft good enough for a Fury cue but I am pretty sure you would try and sell it to your customers as reclaimed old wood.Yawn.
The communist slime ball is stuck.
You can harvest that wood for your shafts .
Spin, spin, spin.
The debate was done when Royce posted.John you've lost it.
The debate was done when Royce posted.
Everything after that is just entertainment.