Another thread sparked this and I was hoping to have some cuemakers chime in.
I've wondered about the bartering thing. Do cuemakers like getting websites for cues?
Just asking as my degree is in graphic design and I build web applications and specialize in user interaction and interface design.
I never thought of offering services for trade because most (not all) of the cue websites out there suck balls. I specialize in content managed custom development, e-learning, and ecommerce. I just can't see doing $2,000 worth of work for a $500 cue, so I guess I'm having a hard time seeing both sides of the equation.
One one hand the design mostly sucks and that might be because they are getting crap design for cheaper cues, but it is no excuse. The cue might be 2 grand, but I'm sure it plays great. It is the designer that is willing to enter the agreement and therefore must turn out quality equal to the cue being given. On the other hand, any designer that puts out crappy work for a client should be shot.
I could never, in good faith, do substandard work for ANYONE, regardless if I'm taking a bath on the project.
I just don't see how these guys do it, unless they're hobbyists as the going rate for professional custom design/development is between $100 and $200 and hour. The average content managed site using off the shelf open source software and a one off template would be about $2,000. Once the client wants an e-commerce site, the price shoots to at least 10k for a custom designed site with features unique to them.
There's also the matter of updates as these systems need to be updated to remain secure. You don't want a client getting hacked and sending tons of spam from their domain.
I'm looking to hear from cuemakers who have engaged in bartering cues for design/development and am eager to know how the relationship has played out.
Are you happy?
How much was the cue you traded?
Would you do it again?
I've wondered about the bartering thing. Do cuemakers like getting websites for cues?
Just asking as my degree is in graphic design and I build web applications and specialize in user interaction and interface design.
I never thought of offering services for trade because most (not all) of the cue websites out there suck balls. I specialize in content managed custom development, e-learning, and ecommerce. I just can't see doing $2,000 worth of work for a $500 cue, so I guess I'm having a hard time seeing both sides of the equation.
One one hand the design mostly sucks and that might be because they are getting crap design for cheaper cues, but it is no excuse. The cue might be 2 grand, but I'm sure it plays great. It is the designer that is willing to enter the agreement and therefore must turn out quality equal to the cue being given. On the other hand, any designer that puts out crappy work for a client should be shot.
I could never, in good faith, do substandard work for ANYONE, regardless if I'm taking a bath on the project.
I just don't see how these guys do it, unless they're hobbyists as the going rate for professional custom design/development is between $100 and $200 and hour. The average content managed site using off the shelf open source software and a one off template would be about $2,000. Once the client wants an e-commerce site, the price shoots to at least 10k for a custom designed site with features unique to them.
There's also the matter of updates as these systems need to be updated to remain secure. You don't want a client getting hacked and sending tons of spam from their domain.
I'm looking to hear from cuemakers who have engaged in bartering cues for design/development and am eager to know how the relationship has played out.
Are you happy?
How much was the cue you traded?
Would you do it again?