Diamond Pool Tables - Degree of Difficulty

Excellent post sir you will get a greenie ! I was thinking that also. I played today at King of Billiards in Akron Ohio, all ages playing no one crying. All tables Diamond Blue label.


lol, all pool players whine and cry — as a group it is their one universal trait. Guaranteed that if the guys at your room aren’t crying about the tables, they’re cryin’ about somethin’ else.

Lou Figueroa
 
Correct

lol, all pool players whine and cry — as a group it is their one universal trait. Guaranteed that if the guys at your room aren’t crying about the tables, they’re cryin’ about somethin’ else.

Lou Figueroa

Their Health :)
 
I own a nine foot Diamond Paragon that I play on nightly and I absolutely love it. I do remember being intimidated by the the old red label Diamonds but I'm so used to the blue label Diamonds that I don't see any open shots that I think I'm going to rattle.

I went to Parlor Billiards for a lesson with Dan Louie and the Gold Crowns felt like I was tossing wadded up paper into the corner trash can. Still would find a way to not get out by hooking myself
 
Why of why didn’t Diamond copy GC pockets angles, pocket size, slate pocket cutouts, rail angles, and cushion material?!?!

There would have been near zero problems from day one. Instead, we have 30 years of complaints. And each “problem” went unaddressed for a decade or more.

Que RKC to yell at me again for not knowing my ass from a hole in the ground. Ha ha.
Pro tournaments used to be played on Brunswick GC's for years, but the pros have no business playing on 5-inch pockets - it would be like PGA tour golfers playing on a 6,000 yard golf course. There were other improvements the original Diamond's had over the GC's - most prominent was the design of the pocket leathers that were flush with the top of the rails, which was a huge improvement. Now everyone including Brunswick Gold Crown's utilize that design.
 
Curious where is that place with the 4.25" pockets that play super difficult? Sounds fun!!

KMRUNOUT


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums

Kerry, you are a glutton for punishment :smile:

Beemers in Leominster. Our home room for USAPL. 8' Diamonds coin op.

Alex said they are some of the toughest tables he has played on along with one of the Snookers tables and an older Diamond table we played on in S. Carolina. I made a mistake gambling with someone at $5 a game on that table that was a regular. Went back and forth for a bit but I ended up $30 loser or so. Table time was like $50 since Alex and I were for for several hours.
 
Last edited:
You can come to our room, Family Billiards in Boone, NC, and sample our 10-foot table with 4-3/8" corner pockets, or our toughest 9-foot table with 4-1/8" corner pockets. If you like to play 14.1, if you can somehow manage to run 42 balls (3 racks) on either one, that is easily the equivalent of a 100+ ball run on a Gold Crown with standard cut pockets.



Wow sound cool. Love the idea of a 10' table. I don't play 14.1, but sounds cool to try. My sister just moved to NC, but I forget where. I think sorta close to Wilmington? Near some marine base. Any idea where I mean, and if so are you close to that?

KMRUNOUT


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Kerry, you are a glutton for punishment :smile:

Beemers in Leominster. Our home room for USAPL. 8' Diamonds coin op.

Alex said they are some of the toughest tables he has played on along with one of the Snookers tables and an older Diamond table we played on in S. Carolina. I made a mistake gambling with someone at $5 a game on that table that was a regular. Went back and forth for a bit but I ended up $30 loser or so. Table time was like $50 since Alex and I were for for several hours.



Interesting. Definitely don't know that place and it sounds like a hike for me. FYI Crows Nest recovered theirs and they are playing nice. Wish they didn't choose the puke blue (I think it's royal blue lol) given that they only have 7' table lights for their 8 footers, but they are playing great so I'm happy.

And yes, I love punishment lol. I actually don't care to *compete* on super tight pockets, but I love solo practice on them. I think table 15 at Snookers is the toughest. But I wouldn't call it crazy right. I think it's about 4.25 but it plays rather slow which makes it feel tougher. Table 1 is not quite so tight but much more lively so that is my preferred table to play on, also because it's the only one with good lighting.

Maybe I'll be in the area some time of the place you mentioned and check it out. Thanks for the info!

KMRUNOUT


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Wow sound cool. Love the idea of a 10' table. I don't play 14.1, but sounds cool to try. My sister just moved to NC, but I forget where. I think sorta close to Wilmington? Near some marine base. Any idea where I mean, and if so are you close to that?

KMRUNOUT


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
No, that is the eastern side of the state near the coast. We are in the northwest corner of the state in the mountains - likely around a 5 hour drive from there.
 
Pro tournaments used to be played on Brunswick GC's for years, but the pros have no business playing on 5-inch pockets - it would be like PGA tour golfers playing on a 6,000 yard golf course. There were other improvements the original Diamond's had over the GC's - most prominent was the design of the pocket leathers that were flush with the top of the rails, which was a huge improvement. Now everyone including Brunswick Gold Crown's utilize that design.
GC4's had flush pockets long before Diamond did it. BTW, GC's were designed as a "commercial" table. They came along in the post-Hustler boom and went in rec. centers, bowling alleys, etc. They had big pockets so customers would have fun and COME BACK. Nobody ever said that 5" pockets were the best size for skilled players. A lot of rooms tightened-up one or two for the better players.
 
Last edited:
.?

GC4's had flush pockets long before Diamond did it. BTW, GC's were designed as a "commercial" table. They came along in the post-Hustler boom and went in rec. centers, bowling alleys, etc. They had big pockets so customers would have fun and COME BACK. Nobody ever said that 5" pockets were the best size for skilled players. A lot of rooms tightened-up one or two for the better players.

Gold Crown IV's did not come out until 1997 a full decade after Diamond made their first table with flush pockets. Were you possibly thinking GC III's ? I am pretty sure their pockets were not flush.
 
Gold Crown IV's did not come out until 1997 a full decade after Diamond made their first table with flush pockets. Were you possibly thinking GC III's ? I am pretty sure their pockets were not flush.


You are right Franko! Diamond did it first. But Brunswick did put the leveling system in the GC4 far before Diamond did on the red labels.

Brunswick paved the way for a very long time and Diamond came along with their own good ideas as well!

Trent from Toledo
 
To the OP, this is my opinion:

1. 9' diamond pro-am 4" to 4 1/4" pockets are "perfect" for skill levels from weak "A-" to pro level players.

2. 9' diamond pro-am 4 3/8" to 4 1/2" pockets are about right for skill level "B-" to "B+" players.

3. Coupled with today's felt, cushions etc..etc... any table that has pockets larger than 4 1/2" plays to easy for most any player that is above "C+" skill level.

To me, large pocket tables are bad for the serious pool player........but GREAT for a business owner that has coin op tables or the like where casual players are their customer base.

Again, that is my opinion.
 
To the OP, this is my opinion:

1. 9' diamond pro-am 4" to 4 1/4" pockets are "perfect" for skill levels from weak "A-" to pro level players.

2. 9' diamond pro-am 4 3/8" to 4 1/2" pockets are about right for skill level "B-" to "B+" players.

3. Coupled with today's felt, cushions etc..etc... any table that has pockets larger than 4 1/2" plays to easy for most any player that is above "C+" skill level.

To me, large pocket tables are bad for the serious pool player........but GREAT for a business owner that has coin op tables or the like where casual players are their customer base.

Again, that is my opinion.
I would differ from your opinion as follows:

4" - 4-1/4" pockets - for pro level players, or stricly as a practice table for strong amateur players

4-3/8" - 4-1/2" pockets - weak "A" players and strong "B" players, practice table for "C" players

4-3/4" pockets - weak "B" players and strong "C" players

5" pockets - all those below strong "C" players including all recreational players
 
I would differ from your opinion as follows:

4" - 4-1/4" pockets - for pro level players, or stricly as a practice table for strong amateur players

4-3/8" - 4-1/2" pockets - weak "A" players and strong "B" players, practice table for "C" players

4-3/4" pockets - weak "B" players and strong "C" players

5" pockets - all those below strong "C" players including all recreational players

I have come to realize that most people's opinions differ from mine when it comes to billiards and pool in general.

All I can say: again....my opinion....lol....... is that pool has been watered down in the US for sometime now.

That, IMO, would explain "part" of the reason the US is so weak in pool compared to well, most everyone else in the world.

What we call an "A" level player here is considered "C+" to weak "B" in some parts of the world.

Add to that, what we call a pro is considered strong amateur in some parts of the world.

Again, watered-down and IMO, why some like yourself rank players the way you do such as the way you feel about table difficulty vs skill.

JMO
 
Gold Crown IV's did not come out until 1997 a full decade after Diamond made their first table with flush pockets. Were you possibly thinking GC III's ? I am pretty sure their pockets were not flush.
Oops. Gotcha. My bad. I thought the 4 came out well before '97. I played on a early RedLabel Professional and it banked so short the room owner all but gave it away. They're really nice now.
 
Recently moved here to Florida- been playing at a room called Diamonds in Cape Coral which features Diamond pool tables- my first real experience with these tables. they are nine footers, probably fairly old, look like 4 1/2 inch pockets ( 2 cue balls will not fit into them side to side) shelf depth seems rather deep. these tables seem to play much, much tougher than Gold Crowns that I have played on most of my life. pockets reject anything that touches a rail even slightly, and hitting a pocket point is pure doom!
So far still trying to adjust my game to these tables, but my initial observations are that the pockets seem to reject balls that REALLY should be a score given a REASONABLE allowance for aiming. any time the object ball needs to travel more than six feet to the pocket, only a slow to moderate slow speed seems to pocket a ball. Straight pool runs are a disaster on these tables, as balls that are run down along the cushions to the pocket are rejected with even the SLIGHTEST amount of off center clearance. Also break shots in 14.1 cannot be hit with the correct speed to open up balls, as most are rejected from the pockets. As for bank shots- these tables seem to bank much shorter than Gold Crowns or Olhausens - I need to ADD angle to side pocket bank shots to make a bank.
Is my experience unique, I doubt it as I am a fairly good player and am really struggling to make balls that previously required no thought. I can see these tables causing young people to forget about pool and try another sport as the difficulty factor would keep player satisfaction to a minimum. I look around me and see lesser players come in and seem to miss 75% of their shots - not good for their confidence or enjoyment of time spent on these tables. Curious as to what experienced players feel about these tables compared to "old standard" Brunswicks etc. BTW- I am up for this challenge, but at times I know that i hit a ball "right" and these tables still reject- a bit frustrating, to say the least. Is this really good for pool?

......


Appreciate the comments. I will go on record as saying that I do NOT like these Diamond tables. I think that as far as a factor contributing to the lack of pool enthusiasm in younger folks, these types of tables would certainly be a contributing factor. Many years ago as a young person, I began to really enjoy this game, as Brunswick home tables in the 1960's with larger pockets allowed one to get fairly proficient and thus have a sense of enjoyment and satisfaction in playing the game. I have stayed with it my entire life because of that. I think that most young people being introduced to the game on tables such as these would quickly walk away from the game because it would just not be fun at all to watch balls constantly rattle in the pocket jaws. I remember pool halls would usually have just ONE table up front near the desk with tighter pockets - there was a reason for having only one - the other 15 tables kept people coming BACK to the ROOM! For myself, a seasoned player, this is now a new challenge, I doubt that I would be playing and contributing today if my first experiences were on a table like these Diamonds./QUOTE]

Six pages later, I've but one question: Is that your real name?
 
It's obviously your opinion and that can't be wrong.

Recreational/ casual players are what keep most pool rooms open. Learned this after attempting to open a room earlier this year. Upon seeing how much cost is involved I discovered this to be true and did not realize it.

The only part of a Diamond I don't like is the deep pocket shelf, it totally changes the way the table and game is played. I also have gotten used to it and don't care so much :)

Trent from Toledo

To the OP, this is my opinion:

1. 9' diamond pro-am 4" to 4 1/4" pockets are "perfect" for skill levels from weak "A-" to pro level players.

2. 9' diamond pro-am 4 3/8" to 4 1/2" pockets are about right for skill level "B-" to "B+" players.

3. Coupled with today's felt, cushions etc..etc... any table that has pockets larger than 4 1/2" plays to easy for most any player that is above "C+" skill level.

To me, large pocket tables are bad for the serious pool player........but GREAT for a business owner that has coin op tables or the like where casual players are their customer base.

Again, that is my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Since you guyz are chatting about the differences, I found out something Very interesting. I'm putting together a GCI total restoration....the cut out holes in the pedestals are four inches on center wider than the GCIII. The stretcher is the exact same length 62''. Having a wider footing I think contributes to the feel of the GCI being more ''grounded''. It's similar to having a car for many years then buying one with a wider wheelbase, the car feels, handles and drives different.
 
Back
Top