You sell the tables, you are biased, whether you admit it or not.
Archer, Gabe, off the top of my head, have gone on record saying they don't like them. I think most others keep their mouths shut because Diamond obviously sponsors many events.
I'd find the shots for you in the final 16, but I don't want to sit and watch all those matches again, its not worth it.
If Brunswick came back to the pro game and put on tournaments with their tables, I think most pros would prefer "the rail action" on the GC. Other parts of the table I'm not debating, each table has pros and cons.
The part about Diamond not wanting to play like a GC I don't believe for one second. I frankly believe they don't know how to make the table play better. It took them 20 years of red label complaints to switch to Blue. And they didn't even do it, it took Glen and/or Mark to do it. It took them 15 years of black mark complaints on balls to switch the pockets. Their tournament software at the DCC is stuck in the stone ages. Sulliven has been talking every year for the past 10 years about making a tour in Tunica, Atlantic City, and Derby City, and growing that. Same talk every year. Sure, its nice that they love pool, but I don't think they get the job done. IMO

That's all.