Or does this even matter?
Over the years I've been whooped up on playing pool with guys who I figured weren't very smart. At least not book smart.
Certain games, like for instance, 1p, requires a lot of strategic skill, so does this mean great 1p players are very smart? Or is it that the scope of the game is limited to doing physical things well such as: banking, kicking, kick safes, playing safe, shotmaking, position play, pattern reads, and breaking well?
Then, perhaps the only thing left to your intelligence is shot selection/patterns and when to be aggressive vs. when not to be.
I hear it sometimes when good players are in a defensive battle; "we have a real chess game here". But is it really like chess?
I wonder what percentage of playing pool [well] could be attributed to the mental aspect and what percentage is physical execution.
I know for a fact that it's possible to be very smart and shoot pool terribly. I have a cousin like that. :grin-square:
Any thoughts/comments are welcome.
Best,
Brian kc
Over the years I've been whooped up on playing pool with guys who I figured weren't very smart. At least not book smart.
Certain games, like for instance, 1p, requires a lot of strategic skill, so does this mean great 1p players are very smart? Or is it that the scope of the game is limited to doing physical things well such as: banking, kicking, kick safes, playing safe, shotmaking, position play, pattern reads, and breaking well?
Then, perhaps the only thing left to your intelligence is shot selection/patterns and when to be aggressive vs. when not to be.
I hear it sometimes when good players are in a defensive battle; "we have a real chess game here". But is it really like chess?
I wonder what percentage of playing pool [well] could be attributed to the mental aspect and what percentage is physical execution.
I know for a fact that it's possible to be very smart and shoot pool terribly. I have a cousin like that. :grin-square:
Any thoughts/comments are welcome.
Best,
Brian kc
Last edited: