In my opinion it’s very simple math - the longer you can survive in the winners bracket the far less matches you’ll need to play and the far better chance you have to make it to the finals!for amateurs and bangers a double elimination tournament involves strategy.
Is it ever useful to take your first loss in a specific bracket to avoid the winner or another bracket?
Another possibility is that all the champs are in your half of the bracket, and if you lose your first match there is no chance you will see them until you're in the money.In my opinion it’s very simple math - the longer you can survive in the winners bracket the far less matches you’ll need to play and the far better chance you have to make it to the finals!
However, there is certainly something to be said about getting knocked in to the one loss bracket early, and then finding your stroke by having to play and win far more matches compared to the players surviving through the winners bracket thus having progressively longer waits between their matches.
for amateurs and bangers a double elimination tournament involves strategy.
Is it ever useful to take your first loss in a specific bracket to avoid the winner or another bracket?
You have to beat everybody to win anyway. Might as well face them on the winners side if you can.
I played a regional pro/short stop one time who studied the bracket and then (I believe) deliberately lost to me because the other side of the bracket had some serious players. Wade Crane, Coy Lee, Danny Medina and Joe Alvarez.
He ended up losing his next match to a hungry young player. I played Coy Lee and lost and then went to the losers side and lost to AZBs Ironman (RIP). That guy kicked like a mule against me. I played some good safeties and he made some amazing kicks, not just to hit the ball but made it with position and run out. He kicked in and ran out 3 times against me in a race to 7!
This tournament was in Denver at the Billiard Institute at Colfax/Sheridan.
Another possibility is that all the champs are in your half of the bracket, and if you lose your first match there is no chance you will see them until you're in the money.
But double elimination is a fundamentally obnoxious format. I wish it would go away.
Ironman was a good dude! I played at some of the Fast Eddie's events in Texas he and his partner put on. They were also involved in the Texas Open for a good while. He is missed both here and out there in the pool scene as well.
What format do you prefer?
Amen. He lived a heck of a life. Lots of great scary stories.
He and I were never close but managed to run into each other out of town a few times and traded stories.
for amateurs and bangers a double elimination tournament involves strategy.
Is it ever useful to take your first loss in a specific bracket to avoid the winner or another bracket?
Lots of tourneys shorten the losers side race, so it could be a non productive thing to do. Especially if the race is shortened by 2 or more games.
Lots of tourneys shorten the losers side race, so it could be a non productive thing to do. Especially if the race is shortened by 2 or more games.
Another possibility is that all the champs are in your half of the bracket, and if you lose your first match there is no chance you will see them until you're in the money.
But double elimination is a fundamentally obnoxious format. I wish it would go away.