DRAW STROKE: Dropping your elbow or not.

Have you even ever considered the possibility that you never got any better because of what you DIDN'T know?

.......... and did you know if you knew what you didn't know that you wouldn't not know it anymore?? Are u getting better??

Name the 2 pros that are pendulum champions... I'll send you a crisp $100 if I can't find countless shots where they elevate and/or use a piston... You do realize any time you have to stretch past your base that a piston is the likely stroke you will employ???

Chris
 
If you start to teach or instruct, you will follow a concept-- where "you" think that it makes sense to follow and execute it. I just can speak for myself- but the journey of learning to instruct is also that you have to learn always something new- especially oyu have to work on your communication skills-- without that you will not be able to transfer knowledge. Every human is individual- so the need of communication-skills are necessary.

If we just take this thread: There are (imo) really strong comments- but do i have to agree with everyone? - sure not. But everyone here knows *some big names*-- and it is useful to make your thoughts about this or that philosophy.
Let me take C.J. Wiley-- an excellent professional in his days. A real champion. If you have a look at his postings since he joined AZB you can easily see, that ALSO HE has earned knowledge from everywhere- from everywhere where he thought- well, that seems useful to me. He has many followers- and these guys will benefit from it, because THEY BELIEVE it.
A player who would not agree with C.J. s philosphy of the game would be a bad student for him and there would be no success finally.

Pendulum, Piston, slip etc etc. --
i am also a believer to use the pendulum principle/concept. But that would be just one point from the concept-- "i say" if i (means the student) follows the complete concept where the aligning is the most important (imo) we ll have this result at the end.

"He or She" will do most of all shots without elbow-drop. And if a shot comes up, which needs a very very high acceleration, his elbow will move..at the end. And it will doesn t matter, because he is perfectly aligned. The upper-arm incl elbow will follow the direction of movement (of the forearm). And then i m satisfied.
Mike Page made a brilliant posting about the "Elbow Drop" (imo one of the best i ever read).
_____________________________________________________________
from Mike Page:

If you were to install webcams in a hundred poolrooms throughout the world and view 1000 random elbow drops on pool strokes, those 1000 strokes might be divvied up as follows:

990 strokes: category A elbow drops
9 strokes: category B elbow drops
1 stroke: category C elbow drop

category A elbow drops--

the vast majority of them--are plainly and simply bad mechanics. This person's elbow is moving during the stroke, as perhaps is his or her head, making strokes inconsistent, making strokes rely on carefully choreographed timing of different motions, and encouraging the addition of other compensating motions. These people absolutely will benefit from learning good mechanics like those Randy and Scott and Steve and others advocate so well. These people should heed the advice of instructors like those I just mentioned and practice it until one nipple is as calloused as the bottom of a foot, imo.

category B elbow drops--

These are solid players whose elbow is still at the time of contact. The stroke is a simple pendulum stroke until after the cueball is gone. The impetus for dropping the elbow in the follow through perhaps comes from the desire to have a long, exaggerated follow through, or perhaps it comes from wanting a level, horizontal follow through (instead of the tip approaching the cloth as in the pendulum stroke). These people don't necessarily need to change anything. The biggest problem they cause is for others. They embolden the category A folk--who don't recognize the difference--thus providing a disincentive for the category A folk learning good mechanics.

Category C elbow drops--

This is, for example Mike Massey. These people are capable of a good pendulum stroke and perhaps employ a pendulum stroke on most of their shots. However, on power strokes, e.g., a break shot or a power draw shot, you will see an elbow drop. These players' elbows are moving at contact because the point is to add some speed by pivoting about the shoulder. In fact focusing on the elbow drop is like focusing on the thunder instead of the lightning. The lightning here is the elbow raise on the backstroke. Then pivoting about both the shoulder and elbow on the forward stroke increases speed. Most players, imo, should never do this for, say, a draw shot. The reason is that while the speed increases a bit, the bigger effect is our precision in where we contact the cueball goes down by a more significant amount. So I would say if you can't consistently draw one and a half table lengths with a pendulum stroke, then there's no way you should be futzing with this stuff. And if you CAN consistently draw one and a half table lengths with a pendulum stroke, then...well...you're more or less good to go!

________________________________________________________

the topic "Elbow Drop" can be discussed endless- but it s imo sometimes sad, that adults are not able to discuss in a civil way.

About instructors: It helps for sure, if you have been- or are a strong player. I avoid the topic *professional*- because i personally see the word *professional* as a job. you can find also so called *amateurs* who have the same skills (technically!!).
There are enough examples, where instructors, trainers or coaches never reached a high level of the game- i know also examples where a coach/trainer never really played the game-and working as *professional coaches* (several sports).
It is all about the passion and the knowledge- and how to transfer it to the individual student. Nothing else.

What is a fact also: if oyu have played as a professional in big tournaments- and has been also a great champion-then you can learn things from this person, that (imo) noone else can teach you. But that would be more on the psychological part of the game.

Sry if i went a bit off-topic- and hope also it was readable enough for you guys :-)

have a smooth stroke.
 
If I am in stroke and playing a lot I can put the cueball on the headstring bridge on the head rail and accurately hit the cueball on the break with accuracy... I found out I could do this because someone said I shouldn't drop my elbow or I would never be accurate and I picked something that was pure elbow drop and sword thrust in it's nature....

I think the skill that separates the pros from the also rans is their ability to know where the tip of the cue is and be able to control what the tip is doing at all times.. For some this comes naturally.. For those that it does not come naturally to they will need to rely on the pendulum and strict rote techniques to control the tip...

I told a friend of mine I would bet that Buste could basically take his cue one handed and flick it at you and leave a blue mark on your nose and you would hardly even feel it and it definitively wouldn't hurt.... He told Buste that and Francisco laughed and he said he thought he could likely do it....

This is also where the guys that shine can get away with elevating the cue however/whenever they want and force the cueball to their will while so many others struggle to play center ball and use a level cue....

I figure you either use english or get beat by it and you learn to use elevation or you get beat by it... While english doesn't really require anything but a pendulum, when you start to hit up thru the cueball and down into it if you cannot control the added muscles of the shoulder and elbow and wrist you are likely never going to be more than a good local player..... Granted the timing is more difficult and you can end up broke down if you aren't hitting balls all the time......

Playing centerball with a level pendulum stroke is never going to take anyone very far when they are playing with guys that have talent and do otherwise... I do however think that the pendulum should be what is taught to beginners because it's easy to teach and repeatable and the better players will evolve from it into more advanced stroke techniques..

I would say advanced stroke techniques only show up in less than 10% of shots... That 10% won't be taught but learned over a lifetime....

Chris
Great post. I've said this same sentiment for so many years. But, it normally gets completely lost and confused in all of the fog of defense of internet posters.

And, unfortunately, it will get confused now. But, 100% agree with this.

Freddie <~~~ it's really that simple
 
Sorry Neil if I shook your tree with my post. I think you missed the whole point I was making, which was "there is no one 'right' way to stroke the cue ball for absolute best results." My point was not about the pros and cons of dropping or not dropping your elbow. In truth (as I said here) I truly don't know which is better or worse.

I have a great deal of respect for the good instructors in pool, many of whom are good friends of mine. Believe it or not, I taught a course in Billiards (pool style) at UCLA in the 80's in their Experimental College program. I never got into the elbow stuff, just showed them how to make balls and how to develop their stroke and their eye. Kind of "old school" stuff. Some of the kids actually got fairly proficient over the course of one semester. But what do I know? I'm not BCA certified or anything else for that matter. :smile:

Thank you for the clarification Jay.
 
.......... and did you know if you knew what you didn't know that you wouldn't not know it anymore?? Are u getting better??

Name the 2 pros that are pendulum champions... I'll send you a crisp $100 if I can't find countless shots where they elevate and/or use a piston... You do realize any time you have to stretch past your base that a piston is the likely stroke you will employ???

Chris

Jerry Briesath and Mark Wilson. And, your offer is off base. You want to use specialty shots as a defining factor, when no instructor has ever stated that if one uses the pendulum stroke, that they must use it on every shot ever taken. Your original statement was that no one could become a pro using the pendulum stroke. Now you want to ammend it to a pro champion using specialty shots. Guess when one knows they are wrong, they have to change the parameters to win.
 
If I'm not mistaken by the term Pendulum stroke, then Kim Davenport and David Howard are two who employed it with great success, both bonafide champions. Kim had the straightest, most solid stroke of all time, absolutely the fewest moving parts of any player I ever saw. And he was rock solid from beginning to end on every shot. Nothing moved, except his forearm! His elbow and everything else stayed perfectly in place.
 
If I'm not mistaken by the term Pendulum stroke, then Kim Davenport and David Howard are two who employed it with great success, both bonafide champions. Kim had the straightest, most solid stroke of all time, absolutely the fewest moving parts of any player I ever saw. And he was rock solid from beginning to end on every shot. Nothing moved, except his forearm! His elbow and everything else stayed perfectly in place.

I'd beg to differ on Kim, but obviously you've seen him more than I. I've always considered Kim Davenport's stroke as one of the smoothest piston strokes with full elbow drop that I've ever seen.
 
If I'm not mistaken by the term Pendulum stroke, then Kim Davenport and David Howard are two who employed it with great success, both bonafide champions. Kim had the straightest, most solid stroke of all time, absolutely the fewest moving parts of any player I ever saw. And he was rock solid from beginning to end on every shot. Nothing moved, except his forearm! His elbow and everything else stayed perfectly in place.


I had the pleasure of warming Kim up for about a 1/2 hour or more before a FL Suncoast tournament in the early 90's or late 80's and he had one of the prettiest strokes I have ever seen. Steve Cook won the tournament with Dennis Hatch 2nd. Buddy had one of the smoothest strokes I've ever seen live. Johnnyt
 
Last edited:
I'd beg to differ on Kim, but obviously you've seen him more than I. I've always considered Kim Davenport's stroke as one of the smoothest piston strokes with full elbow drop that I've ever seen.

Sorry Johnny, I just don't understand some of these terms and exactly what they mean. Maybe in another 50 years I'll begin to catch on. :D
 
Before video cameras, the internet and the _____ for Dummies books, people learned stuff like skiing and pool by trial and error, by trying to imitate someone who appeared to do things effortlessly, and without the benefit of seeing themselves in action.

Small wonder that there are weird strokes out there, with varying degrees of predictability.

If you are starting off to learn some activity, it would be good to have an instructor who understands the simplest fundamentals required for you to accomplish the lesson successfully.
Nobody would teach elbow drop.

The toughest part of instructing is to be confronted by a student who resists unlearning bad technique and therefore cannot progress.
Learning new technique feels strange, and, initially, is less rewarding.

But then there are guys who deliberately flout the conventional wisdom on draw shots :D
Starting at 4:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9C4x0IggY
But that has nothing to do with elbow drop :D
 
Sorry Johnny, I just don't understand some of these terms and exactly what they mean. Maybe in another 50 years I'll begin to catch on. :D

I've never had the pleasure of seeing Kim play live, but in all the videos I've seen of him he rarely moves only at the elbow. Few pros do IMO. I think it's a mistake to say that pros "get away" with bad mechanics and that we shouldn't try to emulate their strokes. Maybe it's these perceived flaws that are actually responsible for at least part of their success. Pool is mostly a feel game. "Less think, more feeling" might be better advice than telling someone to concentrate on swinging only from the elbow.

BTW, Jay, do you know if Kim is still playing? I am very interested in finding out how much his game suffered after his eye injury. I had a very similar injury about six years ago (he got hit by a golf ball, I caught a block of wood off my table saw) and have similar vision loss in my right (shooting) eye. In my case I think it's impossible to play at the level I played at before my accident, but I still love the game.
 
I think part of the reason we see a lot of different strokes and techniques amongst the pros is because pool instruction is in its infancy (relatively speaking). For a variety of reasons very few current pros grew up with fornal instruction so they dug it out of the dirt so to speak. The same used to be true of golf. Guys in the 50s-80s on the PGA Tour had all kinds of unconventional swings. Then instruction advanced along with increased money in the game which lead to kids getting instruction early on and pros having coaches to get an edge. Now swings are much more textbook and uniform. You can also see it in the snooker world. I don't know if we'll ever see pool and pool instruction at that level but I would like to see it.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Before video cameras, the internet and the _____ for Dummies books, people learned stuff like skiing and pool by trial and error, by trying to imitate someone who appeared to do things effortlessly, and without the benefit of seeing themselves in action.

Small wonder that there are weird strokes out there, with varying degrees of predictability.

If you are starting off to learn some activity, it would be good to have an instructor who understands the simplest fundamentals required for you to accomplish the lesson successfully.
Nobody would teach elbow drop.

The toughest part of instructing is to be confronted by a student who resists unlearning bad technique and therefore cannot progress.
Learning new technique feels strange, and, initially, is less rewarding.

But then there are guys who deliberately flout the conventional wisdom on draw shots :D
Starting at 4:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9C4x0IggY
But that has nothing to do with elbow drop :D

Thanks for posting. I had actually started noticing that recently with pool players. I first noticed it when I was watching Mika play a match.
 
This is an interesting topic. There are valid points from both sides of the debate. Personally, I tried switching to a pendulum swing without dropping the elbow. The cue ball reacted differently (feel). It just didn't go where I thought it should. I went back to my old style (elbow drop) because I didn't want to lose the experience that I had developed over several years controlling the cue ball. Most of the top players drop their elbows. This may be more of a factor of the infancy of top instruction when those top players began playing.

When I was younger and learning to play, the only resources that were available to me were Bob Burns The Standard Book of Billiards Pool and a book by Willie Mosconi. Instruction has come a long way since then. As instruction evolves, the standard may become a pendulum stroke. It makes sense that less movement should be better. I think learning the pendulum stroke may help players that don't have the time to play 20 hours or more per week. It can shave time off the learning curve.

IMO, the players with the most desire seem to be the ones that really improve. They will get into the grease (tournaments or gambling). My advice when someone asks about the best way to improve is always the same, deliberate practice and play better players (tournaments or gamble).

Ok carry on!
 
Before video cameras, the internet and the _____ for Dummies books, people learned stuff like skiing and pool by trial and error, by trying to imitate someone who appeared to do things effortlessly, and without the benefit of seeing themselves in action.

Small wonder that there are weird strokes out there, with varying degrees of predictability.

If you are starting off to learn some activity, it would be good to have an instructor who understands the simplest fundamentals required for you to accomplish the lesson successfully.
Nobody would teach elbow drop.

The toughest part of instructing is to be confronted by a student who resists unlearning bad technique and therefore cannot progress.
Learning new technique feels strange, and, initially, is less rewarding.

But then there are guys who deliberately flout the conventional wisdom on draw shots :D
Starting at 4:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9C4x0IggY
But that has nothing to do with elbow drop :D
Seems to me that the section you highlighted has everything to do with elbow drop.

The video touches also on the importance of raising the butt, the use of heavy side spin, etc. Perfect video that seems to highlight every point I've made for years. Thanks.
 
Before video cameras, the internet and the _____ for Dummies books, people learned stuff like skiing and pool by trial and error, by trying to imitate someone who appeared to do things effortlessly, and without the benefit of seeing themselves in action.

Small wonder that there are weird strokes out there, with varying degrees of predictability.

If you are starting off to learn some activity, it would be good to have an instructor who understands the simplest fundamentals required for you to accomplish the lesson successfully.
Nobody would teach elbow drop.

The toughest part of instructing is to be confronted by a student who resists unlearning bad technique and therefore cannot progress.
Learning new technique feels strange, and, initially, is less rewarding.

But then there are guys who deliberately flout the conventional wisdom on draw shots :D
Starting at 4:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9C4x0IggY
But that has nothing to do with elbow drop :D

I LOVED THIS video. Thanks for posting it.

I have a question for those of you who understand snooker language better than I do. At 15:20 Steve Davis is talking about which is better, a longer backswing or a shorter backswing. He then says that if you are too short and too jerky, you may "actually reach for the shot". Can someone precisely explain what Steve means by reaching for the shot?

Also at 17:20 he suggests looking at the red instead of the white because they are very close together. (I get that) But does that also mean that on shots where the object ball is further away, that the shooter should look at the white instead of the object ball when shooting? Do snooker players look at the white instead of the red on the last forward swing?

Also noticed that Steve Davis drops his elbow quite frequently when demonstrating some of the shots. :D

Thanks,
JoeyA
 
I know you weren't asking me but I can name pendulum, piston, thrust and slip... reverse slip is cue tossing and that one I can not demonstrate.... The upstroke is like a rope pull and is advanced so it likely won't fit as a method......

All of these are different in the grip and starting grip position... the range of motion varies in the wrist, elbow and shoulder as do the way the fingers transfer the cue thru the striking area..... They all have different motors for the power source be it shoulder elbow or wrist....

As far as what is taught... You teach the thrust.. Many teach the pendulum and a few actually teach the piston....

Chris

That's hilarious.....:clapping: ....and the elbow certainly does drop. ;)
 
But then there are guys who deliberately flout the conventional wisdom on draw shots :D
Starting at 4:38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U9C4x0IggY
But that has nothing to do with elbow drop :D

I find it interesting that what Davis is demonstrating here is the exact opposite of what Max Eberle is recommending in the video the OP linked to. Davis is saying that, by raising the butt, the player can allow the cue to drop back down as he goes through the ball. This causes the tip to actually strike higher on the ball than intended? This should kill the draw, not aid it. It is this unintentional raising of the tip that Eberle is attempting to help us avoid.
 
Back
Top