Blackjack said:
Not at all. I don't see anything of substance as it relates to the conversation. Just a lot of "IPT or nothing at all" coming from you. The WCBS serves more people than the IPT and it has a responsibility to those players.
Colin Wrote: I think you are way off the boat in your faith in the IOC.
BJ: In what way? This work has been going on since the early 1970's. Just because a Billionaire shows up, we are all supposed to stop what we've been doing and buy a book?
Colin Worte: I don't intend to argue this in a vitriolic manner, but it is something I believe strongly in, and think you may change your mind about.
BJ: No, its safe to say you don't have anything of value to add to the conversation, so you're looking for an exit. As far as me changing my mind, don't hold your breath. I proudly suport Jorgen Sandman and the entire WCBS, as well as the WPA and Ian Anderson,their president. They are working towards something that benefits players (amateur & professionally) . If you have anything that disputes that then please add it to the conversation. These organizations are more than willing to work with KT, but he refuses to acknowledge them. He has nothing to lose at all by working with these organizations, in fact it will make the IPT stronger and nobody realizes that. That is the saddest part of all
I already stated that the IOC empowering international federations like the WCBS actually prevents sports entrepreneurs from getting involved in sports. Traditional Olympic sports have almost entirely been choked out of reaching their potential. Athletics, gymnastics, swimming and dozens of others.
It has been non-olympic sports such as tennis, golf, F1, pro-wrestling, soccer etc that have thrived and the IOC has been trying to some of them back on board to gain credibility.
Centralized, government protected governing bodies are assured to stifle development. Just as centralization and government protected monopolies in idustry lead to poor products and services.
I met Michael Payne, former marketing director of the IOC a few months ago, the guy is credited as having played a major role in saving the IOC from its likely demise before 1984, and gained some more insights into the IOC that convinced me the organization is not a good platform for sports seeking to become high profile successful sports.
He is now with F1 as Bernie Ecclestone's right hand man.
Show me some cases of sports that have become successful after they have joined the olympics, then you may have a case study worth comparing and considering.
Some facts:
1. WPA is not inviting cooperation, they are charging a hefty fee.
2. Billiards is not likely to be included in the Olympics before 2016 at the earliest and you'd even get good odds it won't be included in the next 20 years.
3. By joining the WPA, the IPT would have limitations placed on their decision making process. Interferences and pressures that may not suit their interests in development. So yes, KT does have something to lose out of cooperating with the WPA.
Are you also a big fan of the EU and empowering the centralized US Federeal Government? The economics are basically the same.