"Cocksocker"......that's a new one for me!!!!!!!


You shut up McDonald or Im gonna come and punch you right in the cock!!!!!!!!!!!!
You heard me! COCK!
C O C K!
Baby maker
Main vein
Worlds littleist astronaut
pedro
purple-headed yogurt slinger
Right in the jimma jamma!
![]()
That is straight up hilarious.
Yes, all the phrases used to sell cues here are getting tiring. Just be honest about what you are selling, try to supply specs whenever possible, and provide decent pics...and hopefully the cue will sell.
As to these 'monster' cues that change hands frequently...personally, I want to stay away from anything that has changed too many hands too quickly...that should be sending up red flags immediately. Let's face it, not every cue made can be a terrific player...the odds are simply against it...on so many different levels. Even the best, every now and again, get a dud that might look like a million bucks, but plays like a log. Whenever a particular cue has seen too many owners, I tend to think that it must not be that great a player, or else it wouldn't be changing hands as often as it does.
But that is just me.
Lisa
Hi,
Just thought I would weigh in on the subject of the monster hit.
Each cue no matter who creates it has a harmonic profile that is unique unto itself. While each wood species is different and unique there are certain facts that can not be ignored when analyzing the hit.
First and foremost is the density of the shaft. If you have a 4 oz shaft that spins like a laser between centers @ +2500 rpm, that is a very good place to start when looking for a cue that hits real good. The shaft taper, ferrule, tip, and joint will all make a huge difference when comparing hit attributes. Without the heavy hard maple shaft to start with your just dressing up something that is mediocre. Thats not to say 3.7 - 3.9 oz will not make a very good cue, but if we are talking monster hit you need 4.0 or better.
In the butt section of the cue I believe that the weight and balance is the prime directive. In my humble opinion, I believe the overall cue should have a slightly forward weighted feel. The selection of the wood species has a big factor in the feedback that the player feels and can not be ignored. Maple or ebony fronts seem to be the most revered but that does not mean that other types of wood combonations won't be a home run.
After pondering all of the above and more, biggest factor to consider is the stroke of the player who is the ultimate end user. There are a lot of ways to stroke a cue ball and just as many ways to describe it.
Years ago my friend Stew Mortinson was working as a millwright and he was on a job that had testing equipment where the could monitor the resonance profile of cold roll mill spec. A7 steel rod. They hooked up rods to a frequency device and used an oscilloscope to view the graphic output. Each steel rod produced profiles that were very close to each other with a high degree of consistency.
Stew was also working in Bert Schrager's shop in Hollywood and took some 1" maple dowels to work to test on the set up. He told me that every dowel had it's own graphic pattern and were like night a day when compared to each other without any rhyme or reason.
I truly believe that each cue that is created by the cue maker has it's own bottom line when it come down to the hit and a lot of it is out of his control because we are dealing with wood. Our coarse we can supply the dense shaft, preferred ferrule, joint, tip, shaft tapper, diameters, wood species combination and balance point. If you make 2 cues out of the same everythings, it don't mean they will play the same.
To get the monster hit the player must find the cue that feels best to him and gives him the best feedback within his stroke. One man's shit is another mans bread and butter.
The cue that is right for you is the one that you make the most balls with and gives you the best leaves! Is there anything more to say? If you are an anal retentive pool junkie you may require to change cues from time to time as your skills and stroke develops.
It is the job of the cue maker to make the best cue he can while offering the player a selection of cues. Hopefully one of those cues will be the monster hit for that guy.
Rick Geschrey
Hi,
Just thought I would weigh in on the subject of the monster hit.
Each cue no matter who creates it has a harmonic profile that is unique unto itself. While each wood species is different and unique there are certain facts that can not be ignored when analyzing the hit.
First and foremost is the density of the shaft. If you have a 4 oz shaft that spins like a laser between centers @ +2500 rpm, that is a very good place to start when looking for a cue that hits real good. The shaft taper, ferrule, tip, and joint will all make a huge difference when comparing hit attributes. Without the heavy hard maple shaft to start with your just dressing up something that is mediocre. Thats not to say 3.7 - 3.9 oz will not make a very good cue, but if we are talking monster hit you need 4.0 or better.
In the butt section of the cue I believe that the weight and balance is the prime directive. In my humble opinion, I believe the overall cue should have a slightly forward weighted feel. The selection of the wood species has a big factor in the feedback that the player feels and can not be ignored. Maple or ebony fronts seem to be the most revered but that does not mean that other types of wood combonations won't be a home run.
After pondering all of the above and more, biggest factor to consider is the stroke of the player who is the ultimate end user. There are a lot of ways to stroke a cue ball and just as many ways to describe it.
Years ago my friend Stew Mortinson was working as a millwright and he was on a job that had testing equipment where the could monitor the resonance profile of cold roll mill spec. A7 steel rod. They hooked up rods to a frequency device and used an oscilloscope to view the graphic output. Each steel rod produced profiles that were very close to each other with a high degree of consistency.
Stew was also working in Bert Schrager's shop in Hollywood and took some 1" maple dowels to work to test on the set up. He told me that every dowel had it's own graphic pattern and were like night a day when compared to each other without any rhyme or reason.
I truly believe that each cue that is created by the cue maker has it's own bottom line when it come down to the hit and a lot of it is out of his control because we are dealing with wood. Our coarse we can supply the dense shaft, preferred ferrule, joint, tip, shaft tapper, diameters, wood species combination and balance point. If you make 2 cues out of the same everythings, it don't mean they will play the same.
To get the monster hit the player must find the cue that feels best to him and gives him the best feedback within his stroke. One man's shit is another mans bread and butter.
The cue that is right for you is the one that you make the most balls with and gives you the best leaves! Is there anything more to say? If you are an anal retentive pool junkie you may require to change cues from time to time as your skills and stroke develops.
It is the job of the cue maker to make the best cue he can while offering the player a selection of cues. Hopefully one of those cues will be the monster hit for that guy.
Rick Geschrey
Don't forget "Hits like the rock of Gibraltar" Can anyone tell me who used to say that!!!
Was that JW?