Is the range of movement somehow shorter when going from CB to OB,...?One thing that I have noted is that looking from OB to CB can cause unintentional head movement.
Is the range of movement somehow shorter when going from CB to OB,...?One thing that I have noted is that looking from OB to CB can cause unintentional head movement.
I posted this without viewing thorough Lee.Here is a video that gives occasional good looks at the eyes during the stroke. It's an interesting study, even if you don't find anything conclusive.
here is a pic from that linkI posted this without viewing thorough Lee.
First thing I notice is the commentary by Stephen Hendry is a pleasant bonus. No talk on topic but bits of wisdom like gold nuggets that are for the taking.
Now at 13:37 I find a good look at Ronnie's eyes on the break off.
It just dawned on me that Stephen working with the production would allow him access to camera footage that's not used in the broadcast. Perhaps that could lead to his statement that Ronnie does the same as he does.Just speculation
at 13:37 I will wager gets diametrically opposed judgement calls. We shall see.
![]()
Is the range of movement somehow shorter when going from CB to OB,...?
No one has perfect mechanicsWhy? Seems that would be just shitty mechanics/psr. Should be able to easily move focus back-n-forth without moving your head.
Personal experience or opinion cannot be used to refute logic.
Me too. After 50+ years of object ball last, as a senior player trying to hang on to my game, I’m experiencing success with cue ball last the last few years.Stickin with CBL. Too many issues with hand eye confirmation bias otherwise.
It's a leap of faith that just needs a little getting used to.Me too. After 50+ years of object ball last, as a senior player trying to hang on to my game, I’m experiencing success with cue ball last the last few years.
I can confirm the precise location I’m striking the cue ball and just as important for me I can confirm the shaft following through straight down the target line. When I know I’ve done it correctly, there is no need to look up as I know the ball is going in the pocket.
It's a leap of faith that just needs a little getting used to.
Our non denomination services commenced at 11 AM every Sunday. We called it The Church of the Rolling 9 Ball. Uninitiated called it a tavern.Have you accepted CBL as your Lord and Saviour?
So try CB last, maybe it works, maybe not, easy to find out. Works for me. I hope nobody else tries it![]()
I've done this to a bunch of players, pool and snooker. Well over 90% are OB-last shooters.here is a pic from that link
i played it at slow motion and this pic is as the cue starts to move forward
looks to me he is looking at the red not the white(cue ball )
View attachment 818546View attachment 818548
Well it's been years since I did that. It took me a long time to make the switch so I have avoided looking back. There was a no man's land period. Even after making the Leap of Faith there was a temptation to go back to the proven method of object ball last. Nothing worse than indecision for me.CBL people should obviously also give OBL a good college try also since it offers slight advantages, as listed and discussed in the video.
I like CB-last if CB is really close/froze to rail. I'm more concerned about quality contact on those shots. Other than that i'm OB all the way.I gave CBL a college try and it’s just strange. OBL for-life here. And whenever my mechanics seem to go awry, nothing makes them sharpen up than a conscious effort on eye pattern and focusing on the OBL.
The only times CBL makes sense to me is massé/jumping but those will not be in my repetoire any time soon.
Or maybe shots where the OB is less than 3” away or kicking, but pretty sure I’m looking through the CB anyway.