I never thought of that.It is easy with a heavy cue ball.
Duck at a distance. It required little more than speed. Isn't that how Trump shoots anyway? 12' and little balls - you don't need Bob Jewett to do the math.Got a good look at Judds eyes at the 10:40 mark. Looks like my hypothesis was wrong.
Time to get out the video cam and see which one I actually do look at last.It never ceases to amaze me, the passion that the discussion can evoke. I have only seen that with the object ball last faction though. Obviously both methods can produce good results. The cueball last players seem to be a little more coy regarding their method. Sort of like why interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake. Oops that's tongue in cheek.Seriously studying the play of various players is easier with directed camera work. Snooker coverage provides more opportunity to observe. As Yogi said, "you can observe a lot by watching".
![]()
In my input I strive to relate My experience. I realize and embrace the fact that cueball last is a minority. My study however shows the ranks of Greatest are populated by The Minority.
My study of the results achieved indicates that the final resting place for the cueball can be more precisely controlled with the final focus on the tip/ball at impact.
Soooo my position is, Experiment, try it and see what works best for you. Of course a valid Experiment needs to eliminate or allow for bias. I am aware that looking for confirmation isn't the same as looking for the truth.
That's a faulty representation. Well it doesn't make sense to me as a player that brings final focus to the white at impact. The focus on the strike to the white stays with the cueball as it starts to move. The representation of "looking up" is not accurate. The focus stays on the white in it's journey. A simple task at the speed the cueball moves. My experience and accomplishments playing baseball and table tennis, proof my ability to follow a moving target with my eyes. In pool following The , well My target after impact is pretty easy. It's collision with the object ball is secondary. My fine focus on the white as it travels leads me to Seeing the impact between cueball and object to the degree that I can see the rotation of the object ball as it starts to move. Another feedback., instead of looking up from CB focus to see where the CB is heading.
The quality is less than great but certainly good enough to get the idea.
Just more information.
Improving performance.The quality is less than great but certainly good enough to get the idea.
Just more information.
Oh gosh it feels good.My earlier post said:Her sight focus is an interesting and promising addition to my Through the Window mantra
The quality is less than great but certainly good enough to get the idea.
Just more information.
Improving performance.
Good stuff
My latest improvement runs parallel ....no make that primer to the basketball coaching. The saying out loud is probably more powerful than just thinking it, but thinking my mantra yields good improvement. Her sight focus is an interesting and promising addition to my Through the Window mantra that comes from the M C Esher image.
View attachment 818992
Oh wow, that strikes a chord.. Once again a matter of faking it until you make it!
Thats bass akwards. Well in my school. Looking at the object ball on the forward stroke can result in a bump to whitey and ball in hand to opponent. I sure hope that is just a typo.looking at the object ball on the forward stroke and the cue ball on the back stroke
Not sure which this but perhaps my pause at the backstroke the computer is just giving the eyes a place to rest. At the pause (well for me) is the final ass says mint and the fire at will given to the ring finger.The pause at the height of your backstroke would no doubt be beneficial to people using this eye pattern