Female Pros Are Smarter
- Thread starter Tristan
- Start date
Tristan said:
It's interesting that a statement like this one is considered "alright" these days.
Imagine someone were to make a statement and say exactly the opposite.
Double standards exist and Marxist political correctness once again graces the pages at AZ.
As you can probably sense, this doesn't please me.
Flex
I think their waist lines combined would make that frontal Lip movement impossible. :grin-square:Patrick Johnson said:
Corporate America is generally run by men, its naturally easier too shake a skirt in front of them and get a response with $$$$. The gals broke away from the men I think 91-92 at the US Open and haven't looked back. There was a time period when the gals were making more than the guys in tournament winnings, tho now, doesn't seem like that will happen again for a long time if ever. The play product of men gives the gals the last three, and the visual product of the women gives the men the last three, I think they both should be working together, they do in tennis, and like Janis, bring the juniors into the fold, the US Open would be perfect event, gotta go, at work.
Tristan said:3. The Female pros are smart enough not to show their real speed in TV matches. There's a reason that all the video you see of women playing displays skill levels below the average APA 7. They don't want to knock their action! Imagine shiny dollar signs in their eyes as they bat the seven-ball back and forth.
Discuss.
This is possibly (and many posters have already concurred) the GOOFIEST statement I have EVER read on this forum because:
1. Some of the women being questioned may not even be gamblers.
2. Gambling is a win some, lose some proposition at ANY level.
3. The $25,000 first place payout they may be "dogging" is more than likely a lot more than they are gonna make in a good week of gambling.
4. These women (those who make the TV appearances) are already known worldwide, as are their speeds.
JMHO,
Maniac
The women work together better than the men. They sell themselves and their professionalism.
The men play better no doubt but the women play pretty good.
The men could learn alot from the women, they do not seem to be paying much attention though.....
The women try to learn all they can from the men. they seem to be playing better but I have not watched alot of them play live.
Male pro players have not got a very long event window for their decision making process, many of them seem to have maybe a week max.
All of the short term quick gain decisions the males have made over the years are the reason they make what they make. They all think as individuals and that is the reason there are not 50 pro male players making good 6 or 7 digit money. Without doubt the top few should make a million a year or more in this modern ESPN world. No good marketing as a group no big cash.
The men play better no doubt but the women play pretty good.
The men could learn alot from the women, they do not seem to be paying much attention though.....
The women try to learn all they can from the men. they seem to be playing better but I have not watched alot of them play live.
Male pro players have not got a very long event window for their decision making process, many of them seem to have maybe a week max.
All of the short term quick gain decisions the males have made over the years are the reason they make what they make. They all think as individuals and that is the reason there are not 50 pro male players making good 6 or 7 digit money. Without doubt the top few should make a million a year or more in this modern ESPN world. No good marketing as a group no big cash.
