The only negative issue I can see by gripping a cue all the way to the rear is a possible problem with the balance of said cue. If that is a problem, a slightly longer butt, or a different weight distribution, may help.
That was my first thought.
Modern cue? No finish issue. Old one? Maybe.
But I first was wondering why you had to grip the cue there. Your height explained it.
I am surprised the length of cues is not more often addressed/discussed as far as fitting the cue to the player. Tip size, taper, butt diameter, wrap, joint style, etc....I see all these mentioned and discussed more than length.
As a player I put more emphasis on balance than even taper or tip size and have been that way for a long time, so the thought sort of comes more naturally to me first rather than second or third.
After shooting with a 58 inch cue since 1985, having made my living with that cue, and having even instructed others, I finally realized I might be better off with a shorter cue! I am trying a 57 for the first time today, this afternoon. Wonder of wonders....such a basic obvious thing after all these years. We'll see how it goes.
I have to wonder if your instructor discussed with you the length of your cue? You are a collector, do you not have any longer cues to try?
Anyway, that's what I thought when I read your post.
