In order for most gov. agencies to consider it gambling, it has to be third parties betting on it or be a game of chance. Pool and billiards is not considered a game of chance, so betting on your own ability to play the game does not violate anti gambling laws in most locations.
Jaden
Currently according to Wikipedia (so, not an official source), most states use what is called the Dominant Factor Test to determine whether an activity is a game of skill vs. a game of chance and therefore determines the legality of the betting.
THE DFT states that the following 4 conditions must be met in order to be considered a game of skill:
1) Participants must have a distinct possibility of exercising skill and must have sufficient data upon which to calculate an informed judgment.
2) Participants must have the opportunity to exercise the skill, and the general class of participants must possess the skill.
3) Skill or the competitors efforts must sufficiently govern the results.
4)The standard of skill must be known to the participants, and this standard must govern the results.
Now, given the 4 conditions above, I wonder what a judge would rule when the element of a handicap is involved. Wouldn't the presence of a handicap increase the probability of chance determining the outcome of the game and thus the legal status of the betting?
Last edited: