Let just respect what ryan wants ...and beside it his cue and his money and likeness of the cues he wants....goodluck on your sell or trade ryan
...
axlrose said:No sweat, Marcus. I don't feel you hijacked anything. Some simple threads just seem to take on a life of their own. I also thought dealing with you was one of the smoothest and easiest transactions I have had in a while. I have to admit, I was pretty surprised this cue wasn't snapped up right after you listed it. My luck, I suppose.
As for the trade, I will just keep and play with the Haley. It's a great cue and goes nicely with my others.
Best wishes,
Ryan
Ryan i have one! give me a callaxlrose said:No sweat, Marcus. I don't feel you hijacked anything. Some simple threads just seem to take on a life of their own. I also thought dealing with you was one of the smoothest and easiest transactions I have had in a while. I have to admit, I was pretty surprised this cue wasn't snapped up right after you listed it. My luck, I suppose.
As for the trade, I will just keep and play with the Haley. It's a great cue and goes nicely with my others.
Best wishes,
Ryan
shoutout33 said:I need to learn how to keep my mouth shut!The ONLY reason I was asking the question, was because I know that Axl, collects a lot of REALLY, REALLY nice cues. I have seen a number of his cues that he has posted on these forums. This is where MY, NOT EVERYONE ELSE'S confusion came in.
I trully respect and plan to hit with, one of Mr. McDaniels cues in the near future; however, being the cue-collector-in-training that I am![]()
, I DID NOT understand the logic (hit wise, money wise or collection wise for that matter...) in the reasoning behind this deal.
It was more of a personal matter, and I can, WITHOUT A DOUBT, understand what that feeling is like! I have personally met Mr. Haley, in the flesh, and the guy is gentleman and a scholar. Plus, HE'S the one that told me, that he doesn't take orders. If I said it wrong, then my bad.![]()
This question was not ment to start ANY flame wars whatsoever, but it happended anyway. Axl, my apologies if you felt, I was out of line with the question, but I feel, you're not going to learn ANYTHING unless you ask!
For the record, as if you didn't already know, if I had a choice between the McDaniel or the Haley (if money were not an issue...), I'd have to go with the Haley, simply because of the limited amount of cues that he put out annually. Plus, his designs are an absolute BEAST! Again, my apologies if I have offended anyone, it trully was not my intent. Thanks.![]()
axlrose said:No problem at all. I did not take anything you wrote to be offensive, but an honest question.
I am well aware of how much "collectability" can play into the desireability of certain cues. I have my own confusion over why specific makers are afforded such praise and secondary market prices, when I don't consider their cues to be any better, playability or design-wise, than some others. However, that's a personal taste issue and I normally keep my opinions on such things to myself.
Personally, I think it can be all to easy to get swept up in the hype in some hobbies, being a long time comic book enthusiast and past baseball card collector. As such, I buy what I really like and enjoy using. If that happens to overlap with what the market considers highly desireable, it's all gravy when I decide to sell. To me, the real value in a hobby, like collecting pool cues, is in the personal pleasure I feel from working for, and being able to buy for myself, something I really love. Nothing more. Money comes and goes. A sense of pride and accomplishment can last a lot longer.
Ryan
Ryan,axlrose said:No problem at all. I did not take anything you wrote to be offensive, but an honest question.
I am well aware of how much "collectability" can play into the desireability of certain cues. I have my own confusion over why specific makers are afforded such praise and secondary market prices, when I don't consider their cues to be any better, playability or design-wise, than some others. However, that's a personal taste issue and I normally keep my opinions on such things to myself.
Personally, I think it can be all to easy to get swept up in the hype in some hobbies, being a long time comic book enthusiast and past baseball card collector. As such, I buy what I really like and enjoy using. If that happens to overlap with what the market considers highly desireable, it's all gravy when I decide to sell. To me, the real value in a hobby, like collecting pool cues, is in the personal pleasure I feel from working for, and being able to buy for myself, something I really love. Nothing more. Money comes and goes. A sense of pride and accomplishment can last a lot longer.
Ryan
SCCues said:Ryan,
I like Ron Haley's cues a lot, but I also like the Kun Fang Lee cue by Bill McDaniel with the ring work and a lizard wrap as you described it a little more. My choice between the Haley cue that you own or the McDaniel cue built like you described it would be the McDaniel. I like ebony and ivory cues and I know that you also like them and the Kun Fang Lee cue by Bill McDaniel is one of Bill's best designs IMO. I've never played with a Ron Haley cue, but I have played with a couple of different McDaniel cues and I know from experience that McDaniel cues play great!
Having a preference between these two cues solely based on Ron not building many cues a year doesn't make any sense when you aren't buying the cue to see how much money you can make on it if you sell it. You would like to own the McDaniel cue because you like the way it looks and plays. Your Ron Haley cue is nice, but the Kun Fang Lee cue by Bill McDaniel is a pretty special cue and it's loaded with ivory.
lenoxmjs said:Not trying to To question Mason but I don't think you can get a cue from Ron for less than $2800. I don't even really think he is all that interested in building those. As of late I believe that he is trying to push the envelope as far as his skills and talent are concerned. More engraving, complicated designs with a traditional classy flair ect. I hope I'm not putting words in Ron's mouth but I'm pretty sure about this.
I got the gist of the post. Ron's cues are now selling for more than what you pay for them. McDaniels for less than their original MSRP.
I have owned both and I really wish I hadn't let my McDaniel go as it was an excellent cue and workmanship was flawless as well. Really couldn't understand why it wouldn't command a better price.
Anybody that has Haleys for a $1000 I'll take em all.![]()
pharaoh68 said:Just an FYI:
A four pointer with 4-6 veneers, touching points, and joint rings from Ron Haley is, I believe, $1400 brand new. Of course, you'll wait a while. And if you try to get the same cue on the second hand market, you may be paying more.
classiccues said:IMHO if the man wants a McDaniels, then God damn, who is anyone to argue. I never judge a man by his tastes or his wants.
FAST_N_LOOSE said:YOU DIDN'T FEEL THAT WAY WHEN I WAS BUYING BLACKS'LOL
classiccues said:LOL.. But you weren't buying them for the hit..Plus I was doing you a favor being the youngster you were and not letting you put all your eggs in one basket. But then you went and did that anyways. lol... So some people never learn...
JV