The Crane vs Balsis 150 and out from 1966. It's on youtube.
... Or Mosconis or Cranes 309 on a 9 foot. ...
309 was their high run on 10-footers (I imagine you meant to write 10 instead of 9).
--------------------------------------------------------------Way over the top, sorry. No one is putting down the DCC Straight Pool Event, it is what it is. What it is, is different from a normal Straight Pool Tournament situation.
That is all that is being said here. Don't get carried away
I also think the Straight Pool Challenge at DCC is exciting and fun, but to consider these runs as anything but what they are would be incorrect imo. When you start with ball in hand on the first break shot that puts these high runs in a category all their own. That said, to run 200+ balls on a Diamond table is a feat of some magnitude, regardless of how it was done.
Possibly because most competitions do not go this high.
At any rate Jayson Shaw ran a 227 in Straight Pool on a Diamond at Derby this year in about 58 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oYgBw2aRgY
The next night, Mika Immonen ran a 224 in about an hour and 5 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l91zs-QOQpQ&feature=youtu.be
This was the tenth year of the Derby City Straight Pool Challenge and the highest run up until this year was Darren Appleton's 183 about 5 years ago.
These runs were qualifying runs, not runs in competition, and can be compared to exhibition runs for record keeping purposes.
The highest run in competition is 200 and out by Darren Appleton.
Back in the day, there were challenge matches to 1000 played over four days and I recall that Jack Colavita ran a 245 in one of these matches. Still, even though he had an opponent, I don't think his run should be considered to have occurred in competition.
Do they spray the table with silicon at the Derby?
Stu: These runs were qualifying runs in competition.
I see no basis for your restrictive use of the word competition. I understand that these were not matches and have said as much, but to say that it is not competition distorts the meaning of the word and the efforts of the participants.
I had never heard of Colavita's run of 245, but if he did it, again, I cannot understand your pronouncement that it was not in competition.
I think we are getting very far off on a tangent and maybe we will have to agree to disagree on the meaning of the word competition.
No. The tables are wiped down with a damp cloth. The balls are aramith tournament balls and they are cleaned with aramith cleaner before the run begins. Players can request clean balls to start their turn at the table but that is not always done.
Colavita's run shouldn't count because a one-on-one challenge is not a tournament but an exhibition. It's most unlikely that Jack's 245 is the highest ever run in this kind of match, too.
All runs without an opponent are either practice runs or exhibition runs. That's because in any situation in which missing has no consequences, the run is not in competition. At Derby city, runs are competitive once single elimination begins.
Stu: It is a nice distinction that you have come up with. " situation in which missing has no consequence", however, I believe that is just your own construction, and not a true definition of competition. Furthermore, missing at 98, for example, does have a consequence. You begin again at 0.
I did not think the word "competition" would ignite so many of you, but apparently it has.
If the only consequence of missing is that you must start over, that's called practice. If the consequence of missing is that you must give up the table to an opponent, that's a match. If that match occurs within a competitive event, it's a competitive match.
I think it is reasonable to consider these high run challenges some form of competition as they are part of a tournament. But they are their own type of competition and should be valued differently than a high run achieved in a tournament match.
It would be unreasonable to rank Jayson's achievement ahead of Darren's tournament match run of 200. But it certainly deserves it's own place in the record books. We've had these high run challenges for almost 10 years now and only now have we had a couple of 200 ball runs. That is worth writing down somewhere.
Colavita's run shouldn't count because a one-on-one challenge is not a tournament but an exhibition. ...
But, decades ago, didn't the "world championship" sometimes change hands in one-on-one challenge matches? The consequence of missing in one of those matches could have been loss of the title of world champion. Weren't those "competition" rather than exhibition?