One thing I DO know for sure! I know a shit ton more than YOU DO!!
One thing I DO know for sure! I know a shit ton more than YOU DO!!
They were called a monarch cushion. And I believe they are almost the same profile as a k55 except it may be an 1/8 shorter from rail to nose. I believe they were also used on the GC1. I would pose this question to The RKC, as he is the expert in this area!It was told to me that Brunswick had a Unique type cushion on their Anniversaries and Centennials. This was wayyyy back when. Were they unique,or was it the advent of Superspeed?
Nope I don't find blue easier on the eyes because matchroom said so. I say that because I've played on both and find the blue easier on my eyes. I also just like the look of the grey as well. I also don't see how the red or black dots on a cue ball would bother any viewers.Snooker is successful for a reason but I got a feeling from your response to me that you’re too young and new. I kept hearing about this blue being easier on the eyes non sense only from pool players when in reality and scientifically it isn’t true. Green is always easier on the eyes for centuries. In fact the only reason why all pocket billiards been green for ages including billiards and snooker is because it’s the best for the eyes and tv. But Simonis came and changed that to blue then lied to people that it’s easier on the eyes and sheep’s just went yea ok it is lol.
Ok here’s the most important part. My suggestions above will work 100% and will bring more money and viewership into pool I got 100% confidante about that but here’s the kicker. These suggestions aren’t meant to please you or the young player generation like yourself because you would go with the masses around you and believer nonsense just like you believed gray is good because matchroom used it. Listen maybe you do believe this but I don’t care. I’m giving suggestions that benefit pool for the Nonplayer and people at home they don’t play pool/ not for you. That’s the trick that you need to understand. Gray cloth look dead and dull. Blue cloth too bright and hurt the eyes. Imagine snooker played on blue clothes, it will die. There’s a reason why snooker is always successful they didn’t put red dots on cueball. They kept their tradition.
Even my wife who don’t play pool or snooker watches snooker with me for a lengthy long match. But whenever I put pool guess what happens?? She sleeps or leaves she tells me this game isn’t as good as the other one… what she meant is pool isn’t as good as snooker but she doesn’t know their names.
Listen all you need to do is changes that benefit the viewership for people who don’t play pool. Stop thinking about yourself. Math room told you blue better on the eyes when it’s scientifically wrong and you believed it?? We don’t care. I care about nonpool players here. I want a guy who never played pool to look at it and say ok let me watch more… the only way it’s gona happen if you follow my suggestions
The point isn't that perfection is attainable, it's that a Diamond doesn't even approximate banking on system. Pool is meant to be a manifestation of geometric principles. Just check out classic Donald Duck in Math Magic Land. Angle in = angle out? At moderate speed a GC gets close. Diamonds don't even try.Honestly show me a non heated, non 3C table that does anything by system. You will not find a table that does anything on system, you must adapt. The systems are a baseline and you make up the difference. The better the player, the faster they adapt to conditions. Speed, spin, aim. Diamonds are consistent and can be counted on, they may be different to the "system" but so is every other pocket billiards table on the face of the earth.
So Monarch cushions were prior to Superspeed? What did Diamond have back at that time?They were called a monarch cushion. And I believe they are almost the same profile as a k55 except it may be an 1/8 shorter from rail to nose. I believe they were also used on the GC1. I would pose this question to The RKC, as he is the expert in this area!
I'll say this one more time for the people that don't read!You were lied to, they had the same cushions as the GC1,2,& early 3's had, and the rest of the Brunswick tables, Monarch Superspeeds.
Yeah, they do, check out the DCC bank pool event, over 500 players and no crybabies about how Diamond's bank!!So Monarch cushions were prior to Superspeed? What did Diamond have back at that time?
I wonder if there are STATS on how often PRO's bank on a Diamond vs a Gold Crown.
I agree RKC. Crying over it gets you nowhere.Yeah, they do, check out the DCC bank pool event, over 500 players and no crybabies about how Diamond's bank!!
And the Pros always win!!![]()
Monarch Superspeeds were found on Brunswick tables from GCII and prior.m GCIII and later started using Superspeeds which is a K55. Diamond didnt enter the pool tables market until around 1987, quite awhile after the change from Monarch Superspeeds to current Superspeeds. I believe Diamonds also use a K55 profile, same as Brunswick.So Monarch cushions were prior to Superspeed? What did Diamond have back at that time?
I wonder if there are STATS on how often PRO's bank on a Diamond vs a Gold Crown.
The original diamond had Superspeed.Monarch Superspeeds were found on Brunswick tables from GCII and prior.m GCIII and later started using Superspeeds which is a K55. Diamond didnt enter the pool tables market until around 1987, quite awhile after the change from Monarch Superspeeds to current Superspeeds. I believe Diamonds also use a K55 profile, same as Brunswick.
Yeah but the point is that they both use K55 profile regardless of the brand of cushion.The original diamond had Superspeed.
Then Championship .
Brunswick had a ton of problems with Superspeed when those were no longer made in the US.
They finally found a better manufacturer.
Yes, because Diamond tried to replicate GC.Yeah but the point is that they both use K55 profile regardless of the brand of cushion.
If they really had superspeed on some early tables, and they didn't play right, then either they didn't copy the wood rail geometry of the GC correctly, or the oak rails were too stiff compared to the poplar rails on a GC.Yes, because Diamond tried to replicate GC.
If you think a diamond is banking short you are hitting it too hard. Period.The point isn't that perfection is attainable, it's that a Diamond doesn't even approximate banking on system. Pool is meant to be a manifestation of geometric principles. Just check out classic Donald Duck in Math Magic Land. Angle in = angle out? At moderate speed a GC gets close. Diamonds don't even try.
Yes, on the top side for compression support.I agree RKC. Crying over it gets you nowhere.
Personally I adjust and play both tables. I just enjoy an UN-Frankensteined GC a little more.
Perhaps we should think about how many DIAMOND tables have now been Frankensteined by room owners.
Do Artemis cushions have cloth string embossed into the rubber for support?
Cushions that don’t bank a ball the way you expect they should doesn’t mean the tables play badly or were set up badly. It just means they play / bank different than other tables you may be used to, which is an adjustment you and every other player will have to make. No different than adjusting for cushion speed, cloth speed, pocket size, clean vs dirty balls, etc.From Badboys Texas State Championships. Blue label 7ft Diamonds. Incredibly short rails even at slow speeds. Cue ball doesn't slow down much. I assume rails were replaced or something wrong with cloth install? Never seen anything like it on a Diamond
video link
To be clear... I love Diamond tables! Trying to figure out how they are off
Not really.If they really had superspeed on some early tables, and they didn't play right, then either they didn't copy the wood rail geometry of the GC correctly, or the oak rails were too stiff compared to the poplar rails on a GC.
Nope I don't find blue easier on the eyes because matchroom said so. I say that because I've played on both and find the blue easier on my eyes. I also just like the look of the grey as well. I also don't see how the red or black dots on a cue ball would bother any viewers.
Also I'm not that young (41) . I don't mind watching snooker but can find it a little on the slow side and find their strict dress code out of touch. Dress pants , dress shoes, vest and tie are not needed for playing snooker or pool. Now I'm not saying they shouldn't dress presentable, I don't want to see them playing in ratty clothes either.
If you think a diamond is banking short you are hitting it too hard. Period.
It's all about the hardness of the rubber and how it reacts. If it's banking short, you're hitting it too hard, if it's banking long, you're hitting it too soft no matter what table.
I hear people bitching about tables banking short. My Olhausen supposedly banks short. I can nail any bank on it (or a diamond) The second I go to a valley or a GC (admittedly there aren't many around locally that haven't been butchered or just wore out) they bank different. I bank harder on a GC or a Valley than I do on my home table. I adjust to playing conditions, just like everyone must.
You have to adjust the systems and it's all in how hard you hit the ball. The cushions must compress the correct amount for systems to work. Stop banking hard and Diamonds bank on system. Not the same speed as other tables, but you can use systems on them just as any other table. It takes practice.
With modern cloth and modern rails you don't have to pound shots like you did on old cloth.
Everyone can prefer whatever they want but there is NO SYSTEM that you don't have to adjust your speed for the table. Diamonds play faster... so stop pounding banks. Bank the ball at pocket speed and it plays tru
Let's see a video of you hitting a corner to corner three rail shot through the second diamond on the long rail on a Diamond. You will either be short on speed or the bank is short. Dr. Dave has a whole section of his site about adjusting for short banking Diamond tables. We aren't imagining it.If you think a diamond is banking short you are hitting it too hard. Period.
It's all about the hardness of the rubber and how it reacts. If it's banking short, you're hitting it too hard, if it's banking long, you're hitting it too soft no matter what table.
I hear people bitching about tables banking short. My Olhausen supposedly banks short. I can nail any bank on it (or a diamond) The second I go to a valley or a GC (admittedly there aren't many around locally that haven't been butchered or just wore out) they bank different. I bank harder on a GC or a Valley than I do on my home table. I adjust to playing conditions, just like everyone must.
You have to adjust the systems and it's all in how hard you hit the ball. The cushions must compress the correct amount for systems to work. Stop banking hard and Diamonds bank on system. Not the same speed as other tables, but you can use systems on them just as any other table. It takes practice.
With modern cloth and modern rails you don't have to pound shots like you did on old cloth.
Everyone can prefer whatever they want but there is NO SYSTEM that you don't have to adjust your speed for the table. Diamonds play faster... so stop pounding banks. Bank the ball at pocket speed and it plays true.