Good post. Watch the dvd and try it at the table. It will come to you.
This may help newcomers to the system too.
http://www.billiardsthegame.com/tips-on-pro-one-cte-139
Good post. Watch the dvd and try it at the table. It will come to you.
I don't "bash" CTE instructions; I describe them. I've said many times (even in this thread) that having feel as a necessary part of a system is not a drawback; it's just a fact. The fact that you think it's bashing just shows the oversensitivity CTE users have about any imagined slight against it.
I bring up CTE (I'm not the only one who does) because most here are familiar with it, and because the subject of feel vs. system mechanics automatically brings the CTE "controversy" to mind - it would be perverse not to talk about it.
pj
chgo
Agreed. I, for one, have worked really hard to explain and illustrate how various versions of CTE actually work (see CTE evaluation and analysis). I have also worked hard to point out the many benefits systems like CTE provide to a user. I think threads like this, even though they have continued for so many years, are still helpful in increasing understanding and appreciation of these topics.... Understanding how aiming systems really work so they can be more effective for more people has been the point of the continuous efforts (by some) to "get real" about aiming systems since they were first discussed on RSB more than 15 years ago.
Agreed. I, for one, have worked really hard to explain and illustrate how various versions of CTE actually work (see CTE evaluation and analysis). I have also worked hard to point out the many benefits systems like CTE provide to a user. I think threads like this, even though they have continued for so many years, are still helpful in increasing understanding and appreciation of these topics.
Regards,
Dave
Yes. Here is a complete resource page on the topic:Thread is about fractional aiming, any links for that?
.... i visualize the line from the pocket through the object ball and a line from the cue ball to the point where the cue ball will impact the object ball ... .....
You clearly state that there are only 3 kinds of alignment: thick, thin and very thin. You only describe one way to aim for each of those (assuming the CB and OB are the same distance apart). So to make the thick cut shown on your diagram (copied below) and to make another thick cut with the CB/OB moved 18 inches farther from the pocket (but still the same distance apart), you'd use the same precise alignments and movements - and the OB would hit the rail 18 inches from the pocket.mohrt:Me:
Post whatever instructions you're thinking of and I'll be glad to point out where they're unclear.
Right here:
http://www.billiardsthegame.com/offs...ng-systems-395
No prob.and thanks for the constructive input.
A person doesn't "do" feel; he uses feel to do the adjusting/estimating....you can't even decide if its feel or adjusting/estimating a person has to do.
You clearly state that there are only 3 kinds of alignment: thick, thin and very thin. You only describe one way to aim for each of those (assuming the CB and OB are the same distance apart). So to make the thick cut shown on your diagram (copied below) and to make another thick cut with the CB/OB moved 18 inches farther from the pocket (but still the same distance apart), you'd use the same precise alignments and movements - and the OB would hit the rail 18 inches from the pocket.
Where are the specific instructions that tell you how to change your aim for these two shots? It isn't in the pivot because that only changes when CB/OB distance changes.
This is what is meant when people say that fractional systems don't define enough cut angles to make all shots.
No prob.
pj
chgo
View attachment 220062
I have asked similar questions to PJ's after watching the DVD.... I think what those of us who question the system are looking for is the actual mechanics behind the adjustment that would be universal and not different for everyone.... Something concrete....
I am not a naysayer and at this point PJ is not a naysayer... we would just like an analytical breakdown of some of the movements that would allow anyone to pick the ball up and run with it......
I have zero doubt that many CTE/Pro1 users have improved... I have respect for Stan in trying to bring this system into the light of day... I just don't get it quite yet and going to watch the DVD 1 more time tonight.....
Champ tried to enlighten me with a PM and as soon as I saw he wanted me to switch eyes to pick up the different lines I realized that for some of us it may be the fact that we all don't seem to see the same that is getting in the way of a universal understanding and consensus....
If I have to swap eyes to pick up the lines I am likely done.... I would prefer not to be but I know for me at least it will not be a system I will understand because I cannot swap eyes and maintain any acuity of vision......
Sigh... if we have this tired old conversation again I wouldn't blame our fellow AzBers for tarring and feathering us. Let's see if it goes anywhere new...If you move the CB/OB 18 inches from the pocket, the angle to the pocket will change (unless you move directly along the shot line.) The angle to the pocket, along with the distance between CB/OB determines the reference line you choose (what stan refers to visual intelligence, or shot recall.) There is no exact chart for every combination, as there are too many variables to list and may be different for each person anyways. With practice, you will be able to quickly and accurately choose the CTE lineup. I do mention what works for me on the instructions (where I switch from thick/thin/vthin), it may be similar for others, but I don't know to what degree. Everyone sees different.
I don't "bash" CTE instructions; I describe them. I've said many times (even in this thread) that having feel as a necessary part of a system is not a drawback; it's just a fact. The fact that you think it's bashing just shows the oversensitivity CTE users have about any imagined slight against it.
I bring up CTE (I'm not the only one who does) because most here are familiar with it, and because the subject of feel vs. system mechanics automatically brings the CTE "controversy" to mind - it would be perverse not to talk about it.
pj
chgo
Sigh... if we have this tired old conversation again I wouldn't blame our fellow AzBers for tarring and feathering us. Let's see if it goes anywhere new...
What you say above means there are only three cut angles needed to make every possible shot (to one side) with the CB/OB at a given distance apart. That's just (obviously) physically impossible.
pj
chgo
What you say above means there are only three cut angles needed to make every possible shot (to one side) with the CB/OB at a given distance apart. That's just (obviously) physically impossible.
I just want repeat to be absolutely clear:
1) These are not cut angles or aim lines, they are pre-pivot reference lines.
2) The pre-pivot reference line is determined predominantly by the shot angle, and in some circumstances also the OB/CB distance (such as in shots closer than 1 diamond apart.)
3) the shot angle and the CB/OB distance both play a part in the shot visuals, which affect the entire procedure of line up, slide in, pivot.
Where are the "prescriptive instructions" that get me from pre-pivot reference line to cut angle?...these are not cut angles, they are pre-pivot reference lines.
If I have to learn to complete the aiming process through practice and repetition, how is that different from learning to complete it by "feel"?...if you take it to the table you would quickly realize it for yourself.
You understand CTE/Pro, so you can if you want, explain it a bit more if you can or want.
The pre-pivot references lines get you to 1/8, A, B and C on the OB.
This gets one close to the aim line that sends the CB to impact the OB to go into the center of the pocket/target.
How do you get to the lines in betweeen 1/8 A, B and C?...pray tell...I want to know if it is visuals adjusting thick or thin or what else?
Understand that I didn't buy the CTE/Pro DVD.
Thanks in advance.
i thought i explained it, you didn't catch on???? he uses that 1/2 pivot system that spiderwebcom uses which is a very basic cte system. For that system to work you need a lot of feel throughout the system to make it work.