Patrick Johnson said:
But isn't the cut harder than a nearly straight-in shot, especially if you're hitting it harder and with sidespin/draw?
pj
chgo
I think there's more to the answer than just simply a long straight in vs. a cut.
If we call the long straight in 8-ball as A, and the cut across to the second diamond as B, then...
A) doesn't have the ease that people suggest from going the 8 to the 9. The 30 degree rule for natural follow unfortunately limits the cueball path if you're cutting the ball at all. If the pocket is easy, then you can make the subtle changes necessary on the cut on the 8-ball to get to the 9-ball. If it's not an easy pocket, you will jaw this ball over and over and over in trying to create the position.
So, on easy pockets, getting "good" on the 8-ball is no problem, so for easy pockets, this may be the better choice.
B) This is the easier area position pattern. That is, you'll get in less trouble and alllow better focus on making the shot since area position from the 8-ball to the 9-ball is an absolute standard 9-ball pattern that comes up over and over and over.
However, the 7 to the 8 has its own pitfalls, so with ball-in-hand, the first shot becomes the most crucial. If the pockets are tight, then the first shot has no issues with tightness, and position on the 8-ball has to be pretty good.
If you get "good" on the 8-ball, then pocket tightness is less of an issue compared to A). So, many players will favor this pattern on tighter tables.
I think that's a fair assessment on the thought process of why one would choose one pattern over the other depending on looseness vs. tightness. One patttern is pocket sensitive; the other is more position sensitive.
Fred <~~~ would shoot B regardless