I don't know how much AccuStats pays out in royalties but they do pay. I witnessed a few players being paid and have had a brief discussion with Pat about it. As far as the details of who and how that came about, they're between AccuStats and the players.
Is there something wrong with paying royalties to players for selling their matches to the public? I would think that's the obvious thing to do, even if it's just a token, at least it's something.
If the dvds are causing a bloodbath in losses, then why not leave the matches online for free for a period of time instead of gong through the trouble of production costs to manufacture, sell and ship the dvds? Isn't that simple cost accounting?
Is there something wrong with paying royalties to players for selling their matches to the public? I would think that's the obvious thing to do, even if it's just a token, at least it's something.
If the dvds are causing a bloodbath in losses, then why not leave the matches online for free for a period of time instead of gong through the trouble of production costs to manufacture, sell and ship the dvds? Isn't that simple cost accounting?