Iowa 2025 - Ultimate Pool USA

Need a rule clarification. I thought in ultimate pool you couldn’t shoot your object ball into an opponents and just pocket theirs, which I think takes strategy away but anyway.
I just watched the women’s final and in game 4 Elul shoots her 11 and makes Savannahs 6 ball. Anyone
That's fine. What you can't do is any intentional foul. E.g. sink (or hit) opponents ball directly - loss of game.
 
I learned this lesson recently in a small weekly tournament. Hit a shot and cue ball didn't do what I expected after a kiss and was heading towards the side pocket. I thought it was 100% a scratch, it should have been and I had my hand in the pocket waiting to catch it. But it stopped, it hit some little piece of chalk or something and held up just at the very edge of the pocket and even rolled back a tiny bit. I was shocked but hadn't touched anything and just kept shooting. When I got back to my chair my opponent, who had much more tournament experience than I, said I should keep my hands out of the pocket just for cases like that as there are many people who could try to call that a foul thinking I interfered with the shot.

It was a good lesson, let things happen on the table as they're gonna happen and stay out of the way. It's not a long walk to the other end of the table if it's a ball return.
Catching the ball when it's about to scratch serves no purpose. Just let it fall in the pocket.
 
Catching the ball when it's about to scratch serves no purpose. Just let it fall in the pocket.
that was the point I was making- Shane actually did let it fall in the pocket- he just grabbed it out of the pocket before it could go through the ball return and they still called it a loss of game.

As I stated earlier in this thread, I'm philosophically opposed to overly punitive rules. It is just over the top.
 
I saw a women lose a game because after she fouled by not getting the shot off before the clock she tapped the cue ball with her cue. Not hard or anything . Just one of those little taps I’ve seen many players do to indicate they fouled.. that was a loss of game lol
that is completely absurd
 
that is completely absurd
Yeah I agree.. if she whacked the cue ball in disgust and maybe you see a sportsmanship think but it was just that little tap we’ve all done to let our opponent know it was a foul and he has ball in hand.
 
While the rules may sound absurd to some but lets not pretend there wasn't shenanigans going on.

In the spirit of the rules:

Shane committed a foul and proceed to commit another by touching the cue ball. In the spirit of the game a player can’t touch a cue ball unless it’s a ball in hand. Result is a loss.

The woman committed a foul with the clock running down. Proceeds to foul again by deliberately poking the ball. Could have been done in protest. Who knows. It’s a foul on top of a foul. Result in a loss.

Logically speaking the rules are correct and they were most likely informed about it.
 
It’s similar to the people that accidentally touch an object ball and proceeds to grab it and put it back to where they think it was.

I tell people if they touch it by accident then leave it. It’s already bad enough you did it and you want to do it again by picking it up.

Let the balls play itself out even with the initial touch. Touching it again will be altering an already altered game.
 
Last edited:
That's fine. What you can't do is any intentional foul. E.g. sink (or hit) opponents ball directly - loss of game.
I didn’t know that. I looked at the rules after seeing this. Terrible, terrible rule. I had been generally positive about what they are doing. And maybe still am. But that one makes no sense to me.
 
I didn’t know that. I looked at the rules after seeing this. Terrible, terrible rule. I had been generally positive about what they are doing. And maybe still am. But that one makes no sense to me.
The no intentional foul rule is specifically used to prevent games from taking too long. It's all about speeding up play.
 
The no intentional foul rule is specifically used to prevent games from taking too long. It's all about speeding up play.
Yeah and it probably works for that. I think I’d rather see 2 consecutive fouls as loss of game than that. Maybe not. And I guess you have some control shooting a shot you know is the wrong play.
 
Yeah and it probably works for that. I think I’d rather see 2 consecutive fouls as loss of game than that. Maybe not. And I guess you have some control shooting a shot you know is the wrong play.
That would certainly be interesting!
 
Hmmm, putting your hand in the pocket to catch a ball should, according to any proper interpretation of the rules, always be a foul. Balls have been known to bounce out of pockets back onto the playing surface. I can't think of any situation, other than in a friendly game, (where several technical fouls should be ignored) where this wouldn't be a foul. It's a pool tournament - a competition - and it is played by the rules of the game
.
 
I'll add that I don't think anyone on the outer tables was penalized a game for doing that, only when the ref was presiding over the game. I caught at least one cueball before it went in the hole out of habit. My opponent just took BIH and kept going. Some things are just different on the stream table.
 
In Denver Matlock broke/8 ball pocketed, he wins.
In tournament play that was not the case.

And who wants to ''bend over'' to get whitey Not me. Catch it if your There.
 
In Denver Matlock broke/8 ball pocketed, he wins.
In tournament play that was not the case.

And who wants to ''bend over'' to get whitey Not me. Catch it if your There.
No one has to bend over. The ref immediately hands you the extra cue ball he carries with him since you're on the clock as soon as the balls stop rolling.
 
Back
Top