Is it more difficult to play on an 8 footer?

pmata814

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Just wondering if straight pool would be more difficult to play on an 8 ft. Table as opposed to 9? Because it would seem it is more crowded and less room to manuever. If so, is it significantly more difficult? What do u all mostly play on? Thx for any feedback :)


Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk
 
Just wondering if straight pool would be more difficult to play on an 8 ft. Table as opposed to 9? Because it would seem it is more crowded and less room to manuever. If so, is it significantly more difficult? What do u all mostly play on? Thx for any feedback :)


Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk

No. Straight pool is easier on an 8 footer. Easier to reach break balls, shorter shots, etc... Same reason a 10 footer is harder. Most straight pool is now played on a 9 foot table. Schmidt has run back to back 200+ on an 8 footer and he says it is the easiest of all the size tables.
 
No. Straight pool is easier on an 8 footer. Easier to reach break balls, shorter shots, etc... Same reason a 10 footer is harder. Most straight pool is now played on a 9 foot table. Schmidt has run back to back 200+ on an 8 footer and he says it is the easiest of all the size tables.

Agreed, and regardless of whether or not there are more clusters the fact that shots are typically easier due to smaller playing area gives a lot more leeway to try shots you may not have risked on a larger table.
 
No. Straight pool is easier on an 8 footer. Easier to reach break balls, shorter shots, etc... Same reason a 10 footer is harder. Most straight pool is now played on a 9 foot table. Schmidt has run back to back 200+ on an 8 footer and he says it is the easiest of all the size tables.
Although I saw him run 180 on a 7-footer like it was water. He did have a lot of combos and carom shots. What finally did him in was a scratch that would have hook-followed to the end cushion on a 9-footer -- instead it looped right into the corner.
 
I get a lot more clusters on an 8 footer than a 9 footer. While shots may be easier, the clusters present a whole new set of issues.
 
Who could not respect Schmidt's opinion on 14.1? Nevertheless, the traffic on an 8 footer presents are problem that the admittedly harder to reach 9' does not.
 
Although I saw him run 180 on a 7-footer like it was water. He did have a lot of combos and carom shots. What finally did him in was a scratch that would have hook-followed to the end cushion on a 9-footer -- instead it looped right into the corner.

Didn't Willie Mosconi run his 526 on an 8 footer?
 
Mosconi's 526

Eight footer indeed. Mosconiaffidavit.jpg
 
I think the 8'er is the easiest table to play 14.1, not the hardest. No hard shots and just big enough to make clustering not a prob. Break outs are SO much easier on smaller tables.
 
Thx for the replys. Very interesting stuff. I'm no where near the level required to play 14.1. I've pl ayed on and off a couple months. My highest run has been 9 balls. But I enjoy it nonetheless and plan to keep practicing :)

Sent from my BlackBerry 9780 using Tapatalk
 
i think all games are easier on a 8' table(except 1P). I cant imagine even playing 1P on a 8' box.
 
The little bit more traffic does not offset the long shots encountered on a 9' table. Additionally, you don't have to stretch for shots or use the bridge nearly as often. This really helps on break shots, where you can play the cue ball past the side pockets closer to the object ball and not have that long reach as on a nine foot table.
 
I do not agree it's easier on a smaller table at all. I get to play on both table sizes, sort of grew up playing on 8-footers, these days playing tournaments on 9-footers mostly of course, get to practice on 7-footers only occasionally, and a 10-footer only abroad. I for one make far higher runs on average on a 9-footer than an 8-footer, must admit the latter makes me feel more proud, though, as if I'd done twice the work (exaggerating a bit). The main difference is that the space behind the rack (to the foot rail, that is) tends to get more clustered (blasting break shots need not improve matters at all, on the contrary), and also, potential break balls in the ideal break zones (between the stack and the side rails) tend to block more otherwise open shots. The bottom line is, there's always traffic, balls in one's way, either to a pocket or playing position. When I'm shooting on smaller surface tables, it seems like I'm constantly playing around something - luckily, it's one of my fortés, something I enjoy most about playing pool, but try shooting some 8-Ball on smaller and bigger tables, and you'll see that there are far more road-map run-outs on the larger surface for the simple reason that fewer balls are getting in each others' way, and that's the reason Straight Pool's easier on the bigger table, too. Better yet, Straight Pool on a 10-footer is a bit like Snooker on a 12-footer - virtually every object ball seems to have at least one pocket to go in, if not several (offering themselves to the kind of tic-tac-toe patterns I tend to look for), and there's rarely more than one re-break of a central cluster, and the occasional precision bump per rack. If I weren't short and had to stretch all the time already on the now-standard 9-footers, I'd be all for the reinauguration of the 10-footer for tournament use (actually, I am, regardless, I'll just eat more soup…). Maybe if I were a better shotmaker than position player, my preoccupation with space or the lack thereof would be different, not sure. As it is, I happen to find Straight Pool easier the more space there is.

Greetings from Switzerland, David.
_________________

„J'ai gâché vingt ans de mes plus belles années au billard. Si c'était à refaire, je recommencerais.“ – Roger Conti
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth, I do find 9-Ball easier on the smaller surface table, for pretty much the same reasons: chances of object balls blocking each others' paths to pockets do not seem all that different, nor does position play seem to differ much, but of course one's make-percentage for (in 9-Ball much more frequent) long shots tends to go up.

Greetings from Switzerland, David.
_________________

„J'ai gâché vingt ans de mes plus belles années au billard. Si c'était à refaire, je recommencerais.“ – Roger Conti
 
i think all games are easier on a 8' table(except 1P). I cant imagine even playing 1P on a 8' box.

IMHO, offense is much easier on an 8-footer playing 1P and defense is a little tougher... mostly because you can't leave your opponent a really long shot that they will think twice about.
 
Any increase in offensive difficulty due to congestion on the smaller box is at least partially offset by the fact that this also makes playing defense easier.
 
Back
Top