I don't get it, what makes that better than just trying to run the balls?Lol..I don’t throw 9 balls on the table. I gently roll them. I want running around the table, but I was pretty much moving after each shot. Thanks for all the great reply’s.![]()
I don't get it, what makes that better than just trying to run the balls?Lol..I don’t throw 9 balls on the table. I gently roll them. I want running around the table, but I was pretty much moving after each shot. Thanks for all the great reply’s.![]()
Fast and accurate can be pretty intimidating. It also narrows the distraction window; beating the choke, so to speak.
The downside is incompetence always threatens.
At Randolph Hills in Rockville MD in the 70's, any time I got about 5 games ahead of anyone, my opponent would always ask for a break so that he could go outside for a "tune up".I never saw it myself, but I heard that at Cochran's (SF) in the 60s you could call over to the counter for "a glass of beer and a straight-shooting pill." Not much table service at pool halls any more.
And you'd better remain on good terms with the 'bartender'.I never saw it myself, but I heard that at Cochran's (SF) in the 60s you could call over to the counter for "a glass of beer and a straight-shooting pill." Not much table service at pool halls any more.
Best pool I ever saw was dipped in pcp.I once watched a late-nite gambling match between two greats(one is a HOF'r). As it got really late it turned into a contest between pills vs. powder. Powder won by a nose.![]()
Throwing out is a term I've heard others use for tossing them on the table.
I'm sure he's throwing them at fastball speed from 30 feet away there dude. Generally you have good points, this just sounds like you're channeling @justnum
This is literally one of the dumbest things I've heard on here. "Throwing out" doesn't mean he's flipping the tray over or really banging them on the table.
Have you ever did a jump shot? Balls hit the slate often. You just spouted off some real dumb, dumb so dumb it's almost impressive.
Still will never generate enough force to even remotely damage the slate. I've seen GC's that had 40+yrs of commercial use/abuse and the slate surface was still pristine. Maybe a air-cannon/Randy Johnson fastball speed impact but just tossing balls on the bed won't hurt it.Throwing out is a term I've heard others use for tossing them on the table.
One reason I disallow tossing balls is they usually fall onto the cloth/slate from a greater height than most jump shots reach, with more force.
Throwing out is a term I've heard others use for tossing them on the table.
One reason I disallow tossing balls is they usually fall onto the cloth/slate from a greater height than most jump shots reach, with more force.
A typical table will bounce a ball to about half of the height it's dropped from. (This depends on the slate and the cloth.) Each bounce contact has about half the energy of the previous one. It's easy but noisy to test the fraction of bounce.You are comparing the energy in a dropped ball to the energy of the jumped ball landing. The energy put into the table to get a ball to leave the surface is much greater than the energy of it landing.
I'm sure he's throwing them at fastball speed from 30 feet away there dude. Generally you have good points, this just sounds like you're channeling @justnum
This is literally one of the dumbest things I've heard on here. "Throwing out" doesn't mean he's flipping the tray over or really banging them on the table.
Have you ever did a jump shot? Balls hit the slate often. You just spouted off some real dumb, dumb so dumb it's almost impressive.
The Grand Canyon was created by one droplet of water, that droplet of water kept acting for millions of years.
If you want to deconstruct a theory, then the argument would be cheap slate erodes faster. Cheap slate suppliers are using cheap production methods that cause structural failures in the slate, making it prone to failure. Throwing the balls on cheap slate causes dents, but it doesn't cause the same type of dents in all slate.
The best argument is gradients on roads. Highway roads should use a different formula for the surface than local roads. Highway roads require higher quality. Local roads lower quality.
In terms of managing the situation @boogieman is not respecting the talent and knowledge of others. Boogieman's action is funny in a 3rd grade way.
What confuses most people is watching pro pool. Pro pool is always played on mostly new equipment.
However most players compete on less than new equipment. It confuses players because getting the chance to be on new equipment is expensive.
The best times is when a new player joins and is not familiar with the awkwardness of a specific table. The strong players handle it well, the players that are just there usually react differently.
Do you play in a private room at home? You may have never seen young people at a local hall toss balls so high to land onto a table, they bounce multiple times upon landing. It can't be good for the cloth or the balls, let alone the slate.You are comparing the energy in a dropped ball to the energy of the jumped ball landing. The energy put into the table to get a ball to leave the surface is much greater than the energy of it landing.
How to show other people you don't know and desperately want to be.The Grand Canyon was created by one droplet of water, that droplet of water kept acting for millions of years.
If you want to deconstruct a theory, then the argument would be cheap slate erodes faster. Cheap slate suppliers are using cheap production methods that cause structural failures in the slate, making it prone to failure. Throwing the balls on cheap slate causes dents, but it doesn't cause the same type of dents in all slate.
The best argument is gradients on roads. Highway roads should use a different formula for the surface than local roads. Highway roads require higher quality. Local roads lower quality.
In terms of managing the situation @boogieman is not respecting the talent and knowledge of others. Boogieman's action is funny in a 3rd grade way.
What confuses most people is watching pro pool. Pro pool is always played on mostly new equipment.
However most players compete on less than new equipment. It confuses players because getting the chance to be on new equipment is expensive.
The best times is when a new player joins and is not familiar with the awkwardness of a specific table. The strong players handle it well, the players that are just there usually react differently.
WTF???????????????The Grand Canyon was created by one droplet of water, that droplet of water kept acting for millions of years.
If you want to deconstruct a theory, then the argument would be cheap slate erodes faster. Cheap slate suppliers are using cheap production methods that cause structural failures in the slate, making it prone to failure. Throwing the balls on cheap slate causes dents, but it doesn't cause the same type of dents in all slate.
The best argument is gradients on roads. Highway roads should use a different formula for the surface than local roads. Highway roads require higher quality. Local roads lower quality.
In terms of managing the situation @boogieman is not respecting the talent and knowledge of others. Boogieman's action is funny in a 3rd grade way.
What confuses most people is watching pro pool. Pro pool is always played on mostly new equipment.
However most players compete on less than new equipment. It confuses players because getting the chance to be on new equipment is expensive.
The best times is when a new player joins and is not familiar with the awkwardness of a specific table. The strong players handle it well, the players that are just there usually react differently.
Bad behavior but it doesn't hurt anything. Give 'em one warning, after that they got tossed.Do you play in a private room at home? You may have never seen young people at a local hall toss balls so high to land onto a table, they bounce multiple times upon landing. It can't be good for the cloth or the balls, let alone the slate.
He just pulls stupid thoughts out and tries to arrange them in a way that might be construed plausible.WTF???????????????