Thank you very much for your inquiry sir. I sincerely appreciate the interest. Please, no admiration necessary. Passion for the game runs deep in all of us and I simply feel we all deserve to have a pro organization / tour to enjoy. It seems I'm the only one dumb enough to take on the venture.
One major factor that many may not be taking into consideration here is that this is a QUALIFIER, not a normal tournament. By definition, multiple industry standards and normal practice, qualifier fees fund the winner's entry into the next level or main event - nothing more. In the NBL it FULLY sponsors the winner's participation in the main event including their $1,000 entry slot, travel expenses, lodging, and 2 custom uniform jerseys.
I'm trying to add incentives for players interested in competing such as yourself by making it a standard of qualifiers for the NBL to offer additional means of reward for those that come in short of 1st place AND add to the winnings of the 1st place finisher by asking all TDs that are permitted to hold "side pots" (participants only) or "calcuttas" (open to anyone) to offer such. It's true, side pots and calcuttas require your involvement to be rewarded. "You've gotta be in it to win it." There's no such thing as free money in this World; at least not that I know of. I wouldn't worry about a local amateur getting bid up to $500.00 however. One of the 2 favorites at my 1st qualifier who wound up winning it, went for $200. The runner-up went for $220 which was the highest bid.
In addition to that, all locations were suggested to hold several mini satellite events to not only fund the top 8 finishers of the actual qualifier, but also to help stimulate pool room activity across the nation at the locations gracious enough to host such events for us. THAT would be "free money" or "added money" for the top 8. Unfortunately, the COVID pandemic completely eliminated the possibility of such happening for the first few qualifiers kicking off. There are currently satellite events going on and added money raised through various means (local advertisers, sponsors, promoters, TDs, venue owners, etc.)
As players understandably have concerns of not winning 1st place, I sincerely believe that players getting involved should have more faith in themselves to indeed win as the races are mainly alternate break format to only 5 games which is really a toss up. The 4 rounds on the winners' side are alternate break to 9. I do believe that the winner should truly win and I also believe that the rest of the top 25% finishers should at least get their money back and a free fun day of good competition. Hopefully, as we move forward, these concerns can all be addressed and resolved as we grow.
Moving forward for places that are now reopened, hopefully we can have $25-$50 minis/satellites to make it even more affordable for players and generate top 8 "added" money. With a 16 player field at $25, the top 2 can be entered into the NBL Stage 1 Qualifier (S1Q) as all top 4 receive their money back. More reward obviously with a $50 entry mini.
Thank you once again for kind and genuine inquiry sir.
Thank you for your response. This is a perfect scenario should help me get very clear clarification.....
Now that you have stressed QUALIFIER as opposed to tournament, I see that point more clearly. Given the fact that its a QUALIFIER, no ALL money will be paid back because something has to fund the winners trip the the larger tournament. Very clear and completely understood. Not ALL of the money will be paid back. But, with a full field, we are talking about $4800 in total.
Lets break down your sentence you typed in the response to my original question........ "One of the 2 favorites at my 1st qualifier who wound up winning it, went for $200. The runner-up went for $220 which was the highest bid."
So the player who placed first went for $200......help me understand his total payments in each of these three scenarios:
1) he paid his $150 entry AND purchased himself in the calcutta
2) he paid his $150 entry AND purchased half of himself from whoever bought him in the calcutta
3) he paid his $150 entry and DID NOT participate in the calcutta in any way
And, please help me under stand the total payouts for the player who got
second place for the same 3 scenarios:
1) he paid his $150 entry AND purchased himself in the calcutta
2) he paid his $150 entry AND purchased half of himself from whoever bought him in the calcutta
3) he paid his $150 entry and DID NOT participate in the calcutta in any way
If player 2 bought himself completely, his entry was $150 and his calcutta was $220. He was $370 in was far as entry fees plus other costs for the day. He placed
second in the calcutta. This assumes he bought himself. Help me see the TOTAL breakdown of his day financially under the assumption that HE bought HIMSELF. Total meaning tournament payout (if any) and calcutta payout. I know the calcutta is based off of how much was bid on other players.
But since this is a your recent real life scenario as you mentioned, you should have all the numbers right in front of you. We know the top two bids total $420 based on your response to my first question.
I am asking for the comparison because the player who won it got the prize package. Thats a little easier to swallow if you are the winner regardless of whether you participated in the calcutta. My interest is for those who dont win first place.
I live in a rural area and would willingly drive the two hour minimum distance for myself to one of these events IF I feel like everything is on the up and up. And based on your business model, you need players like me who have the financial means to participate, the skills to effectively participate, the desire to participate and who are willing to participate. You said yourself......players have to "do their part". And I agree.....we as players do have to do our part to help bring everything together. But we also have a right to understand the big picture.
I have been reading and reading and reading without responding for a while on the subject trying to gain a clear understanding of everything. I am excited about your venture but just cannot get over the hump of 32 players at $150 per person for a total of $4800 and the top 8 POTENTIAL payouts having to be only funded based on a side pot that may or may not even be legal in some areas. And the idea to "contact each tournament director" for final clarification seems evasive. Wouldnt it make sense to have a consistent answer.......regardless of what that answer may be and even if we dont like the answer. Hypothetically, I understand that hosts may "add" money and blah blah blah. But the reality is thats an absolute best case scenario. Lets for conversation sake assume they are not adding money. Lets assume that 9 out of 10 qualifiers will not be adding money. Thats the breakdown and answer I am seeking. If we show up and a TD adds money, that just makes life a little sweeter. But, as one response to my earlier question stated, "nothing is free" in life.
If there is one thing I have learned about this board, its that there are some very smart people here who sometimes see things from a different perspective than I do and who help me see situations more clearly when I read about them. Thats basically what I am hoping to gain from my posts on this. That way, I can decide whether its a fit for me. And it could help others do the same.
Oh.....lastly, what happens if we move into this, have multiple qualifiers, etc, etc and then the wheels fall off and you dont have the bigger events. What happens to the "prize package" funds that the qualifier winners won and have coming to them?
Now, its your venture and kudos to you for doing it. If I have crossed a line, ticked you off and you dont want me as a customer, no harm no foul. I will move on and have a good day and wish you the same.