The match will never go off. John has nothing to lose, and everything to gain. Lou has nothing to gain, and everything to lose. He's being asked to gamble for more than he won in the first match. First minus. He's dealing with JB, so he knows that no matter if he wins or loses, he will still have to deal with John's antics over the next 18 months, Second minus. If John loses, well....he already lost, and looked bad in the process. So, if it happens again, we all just say "we all knew this would happen". Third minus.
Look at it from Lou's perspective. Let's say he's being backed in this. He may make $3-4k on the endeavour. For some people, they'd go to the end of the Earth for that money. Some wouldn't cross the street for it. I can see Lou's point of just wanting to have the money and the win, and saying "I'm done with JB".
If JB really wanted to play Lou, he'd accept Lou's terms, because there's nothing really out of hand in his proposal. If someone really wants the action, they find a way to make it happen. With negotiations.
The terms are not unreasonable generally speaking. Maybe unreasonable for you for perfectly legitimate reasons.
By dictating the location and the duration of the match, at a minimum, he was giving himself an advantage. Isn't that reasonable to receive some weight after losing the first go 'round?
I think if you agreed to the offer the match would play, or he would have to go in to hiding after all the barking.
OK - I'll try this:
Lou and John,
I know that we here at AZ would like to see some sort of rematch happen.
I have learned that negotiations between two earnest parties are always negotiable. If you both sincerely want to play, you will address the other party's reasonable concerns. I agree with Lou that a 10 ahead match is an open ended invitation with no guaranteed term.
John, if you are sincere about a rematch, stating that unilaterally dictated terms as "non-negotiable" looks like a deal killer. Please keep an open mind and at least consider Lou's concerns.
I think John's other requests are reasonable under the circumstances, although I can understand Lou not necessarily wanting to now double up the original bet.
Lou, would you accept John's other terms if he agreed to play a race instead? If so, what length of race would you be comfortable with, and at what amount?
Lou, it would be completely understandable if you were to just say "no" and walk away considering what you went through the last time. Please let us know - is there any real desire to play him again?
Chris
Artie B and I played a race to 7 that took 16 hours a few years back at Derby City. I was dead for two days. Eight hours a day might be ok for a few days, but it is doubtful you could finish unless someone just fell dead and could not make a ball.
Ten ahead might take forever. I agree that John knew the conditions were unacceptable when he made the offer. I do believe he would play if you accepted, but he was sure you would not.
Yet he still has his following that think we are haters for calling him out on it ,,
1
It might take forever unless one of us comes off the stall.
Then offer a time limit on days with a pro-rated payout for whoever is ahead when the time is up.
I am happy to have more time to prepare but the match WILL NOT HAPPEN anywhere close to any of my shows ever again. The other reason that there is a specific time line on this one is that most our money is tied up in our business and it's rare that I have 20k liquid at any given time. Contrary to popular belief we aren't millionaires yet from cue cases. So, the money not spent on this match will be quickly used for other more productive purposes.
I would agree to a prorate after five days. A week of pool to try and make $20,000 is a pretty good opportunity and not unreasonable. Professional pool players fly around the world to battle for a week to make less.
My PM Box and email are available. There will be no chance of me agreeing to any sort of race.
The funny part is that I had one good chance to actually bust a good chinese player for a boatload of money and all I could get after 3 days was $1800 at $600US a game. The guy shot too straight and never met an 85 degree cut he couldn't make. Plus he was a great snooker player so he could move pretty good once he saw the strategy.
When I say boatload of money I mean he brought a Prada bag FULL of money to play with on day two. I was sick thinking of that bag every time I took a shot.
Thanks Shawn, I certainly raised my eyebrows when I saw your name on the order list. Thanks for choosing us to protect your cues.
This match isn't about CTE vs. anything else. CTE is only a way to aim. It doesn't fix any bad habits.
I don't want to go anywhere to play. I don't want a race this time. I want to insure that I can't run out of runway so to speak. I have been beaten in an ahead set from being on the hill at +5 so I know it's possible even if not probable. But a set is a war of attrition where it gets increasingly statistically impossible to win when one guy gets on the hill and the other person needs many games.
As for the terms. I don't really care about negotiating. It's $20,000. These are my conditions for spending it. Of course if the dates don't work then we possibly could work on that. Everything else not so much. Plus Shawn to be honest I don't want the drama this time around. That's why I want it simple and clear.
If, however, anyone wants to back me then I will accept all negotiated terms they make. I will be wherever they tell me to be and ready to play. Otherwise I have a lot of money to lose and surely the last shot at any sort of "redemption" for my horrid play last time unless I agree to prostrate myself in a short set in St. Louis.
Perhaps but nothing I wrote is out of line in any way.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't matter because it's not a show that I care about charging anyone to watch or even if anyone watches. I got all the taste for theater out of my system the last time. Frankly I think I would prefer it not be streamed so that I don't have to think about the comments.
I don't know anything. I will gladly put up my x-rays to yours to see who can stand up longer. Nothing I offered you is unreasonable. You agreed to play eight hours a day before. That match could have easily gone for a week if I had played you tighter.
Everyone has you pegged as the heavy favorite. I think you're better than me but not enough that you will run over me. In any event you made the first challenge in the anticipation that I wouldn't accept it and you could continue to call me a two-bit-coward forever. I played you for $10,000 agreeing to almost all of your terms as presented and going out of my way to accommodate you even when you were unreasonable.
Anyway, IF you really want to play then you are fully capable of writing an email to me to discuss it. Nothing is ever truly "non-negotiable" but you will need to have a discussion with me in a civil manner if you want me to come off any of these points.
Lou, I can "spam" the group with my ads all day simply by engaging in many conversations and sharing my industry and pool experience. I don't need to attempt to give you a virtual free roll (so thinks the smart money) at $20,000 to do it. Maybe I am bluffing but until you or your backers call me you will never know will you?
Kind of like when I asked you FOUR times on this forum to double the bet last time. Not even one time did you acknowledge the offer when I stipulated that we had to freeze up the whole amount. Then you decided to call and come over the top and ended up playing for a lot less because you waited too long. So it's up to you. If you can't fade it for whatever reason then I understand but that's on you not on me.
You have until this coming Friday to work it out or the offer is off the table for now.
So you want 10 ahead, minimum of 3 to 5 days, XX hours per day, pro rate after expiration @ $2000 per game?
That is a long, long match. But we have a starting place.
Lou, do you have a counter offer? In all honesty, you are a young looking 62. I would have never guessed you were in your 60's looking at you on video. Age, as we all should know by now, does not necessarily mean much. Health and fitness are far more significant.
A suggestion: Play three sets of best two out of three.![]()
Wrestling... pigs......am reconsidering whether I want to be involved at all.
One more thing, John: I beat you.
I won your money. I put up with all your crap about how I would not show; how I would crumble; that you would prove a CTE player would defeat a feel player; your YouTube rant; and the loads of insults you poured on me here for five months.
I don't need to prove anything.
And unlike you, I don't need vindication. Not from trying to get into a fight minutes before the match so I'd have an excuse to bail; not for dogging my brains out on a live stream; not for being a cheater and arranging to get coached during the match; and not for losing.
Kiss my ass, John.
Lou Figueroa
One more thing, John: I beat you.
I won your money. I put up with all your crap about how I would not show; how I would crumble; that you would prove a CTE player would defeat a feel player; your YouTube rant; and the loads of insults you poured on me here for five months.
I don't need to prove anything.
And unlike you, I don't need vindication. Not from trying to get into a fight minutes before the match so I'd have an excuse to bail; not for dogging my brains out on a live stream; not for being a cheater and arranging to get coached during the match; and not for losing. And now you want me to email you to beg for terms.
Kiss my ass, John.
Lou Figueroa
JB can't break even or come out ahead unless he agrees to Lou's terms.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
IF we were to play I'd have no problem with three days and pro rate it.
And thanks for the kind words about the 62.
Lou Figueroa
One more thing, John: I beat you.
I won your money. I put up with all your crap about how I would not show; how I would crumble; that you would prove a CTE player would defeat a feel player; your YouTube rant; and the loads of insults you poured on me here for five months.
I don't need to prove anything.
And unlike you, I don't need vindication. Not from trying to get into a fight minutes before the match so I'd have an excuse to bail; not for dogging my brains out on a live stream; not for being a cheater and arranging to get coached during the match; and not for losing. And now you want me to email you to beg for terms.
Kiss my ass, John.
Lou Figueroa
Nonsense. First of all your crew started in on me on the other forum with the high roll challenge of playing for 20k.
Then after I said I would play for 10k you and them called me all sorts of names on there. That ran it's course there and was dropped.
Then you started it over here by calling me "two bit coward" with a link to the thread on one pocket.org
Then, AFTER I reminded you that I never rescinded my offer to play for 10k you ONLY made a challenge on AZB publicly AFTER you got backed to do so.
Then you whined when the thread was sent to NPR arguing that the "trash talk" was good for AZB and good for ratings.
So don't act like the victim here when you and several others actually conspired to bait me and hustle me. I lost but not because you beat me.
You're 100% right, after nine hours you were only 3 games ahead of me and ALL three of those were games I gifted to you not games where I had no chance to win. In fact EVERY game you won was because of unforced errors not because you out moved me.
If I were you I would never play me again for any amount. You're not worried about the trash talking since you did plenty of it. You're flat out scared to lose. Just like every two-bit nit in every pool room around the world. You snapped off one score and you will hold onto it like it's the last drop of water on earth.
And that's fine, if I were in your position I would want to savor the most important victory of my life as well. It's still nitty but I can understand the sentiment.
So, I guess that this means we don't need to talk about it anymore. Thanks for the action the first time around. I enjoyed the whole thing even though I ended up playing horribly. Hope you and Gail have an enjoyable holiday season.
Best,
John