Joey,
Well, since you insist, I'm going to give up 3 of the secrets that I learned this week that were quite a pleasant surprise (and will not help you a bit JA, you are just going to have to visit the Basement if you want it all).
#1 - It is NOT all about "feel". There are extremely detailed scientific principles involved in John's method. I found it a bit like straight pool - you can readily learn the "principles", but knowing how and when to apply them is the trick.
On many shots you will need to violate certain basic principles and follow a different one. Very complex, but manageable so far for me (I suspect I have much more to learn). If it was all feel then time is all anyone would need; there are definitely shortcuts to proficiency in banks. Many bank players know how to do it, but can't explain exactly why it works; or have gaps in their systems. No gaps were evident in John's methods.
#2 - "Feel" is really important. - I am quite certain that following John's advice will rapidly improve any bank player who follows it. The reason is that your "feel" is based on how you have struck the banks in the past; and comparing to the results achieved in the past. Once you use John's principles of maximizing success, and strike your banks the proper, highest yield way; your "feel" will improve by leaps and bounds. Consistency in striking banks the proper way will enable the student to achieve a higher level of success much more quickly than trying to "figure it out on their own."
#3 - It is NOT simple. - All students of the game understand the basic principles and physics involved with banking; and understand that under real life conditions "angle in = angle out" is not really the way it works. All students also understand the different ways that speed, English, distance from the rail, humidity, and table conditions affect these angles. Knowing how to incorporate these variables into your decisions is complex. Knowing how to vary your technique depending on the score of a game, or the type of game, or on the particular features of your opponent's game is also complex.
It is NOT simple enough to really get any useful information in a medium such as this. As admirable as Freddy's attempts at getting it onto paper are; it just is too difficult to convey in print. I am quite hopeful that John will get some video's out similar to John Schmidt's - that is a great way to get the message (but still not ideal). Until you can get him on the table and show you the stuff, you won't be sure you've "gotten it."
I was quite amazed at the difference even a half inch can make - you look at tapes and think you know where the balls are; but if you move them even a millimeter or two the results can be profoundly different. We spent significant amounts of time positioning and marking the balls perfectly to find the very limits of what is possible with "turning" banks - I don't think a book could ever convey the exactitude of John's play, nor the level of precision required to execute it - his level of precision is unbelieveable.
You are a good liaison man Mr. Betmore. :bow-down::bow-down:
You've communicated some VERY valuable information without giving too much away, enabling the professional players to still be able to earn a day's pay for teaching their craft, yet you satisfy, albeit only temporarily, the weeping and wailing of those who are so jealous of your time with THE BEST BANK POOL PLAYER IN THE WORLD.
Thank you for sharing these well articulated "SECRETS".
JoeyA (should have worked for the CIA when it comes to getting secrets out of people) :wink2: