TellsItLikeItIs said:
John, You may not be aware of it but your whole attitude has changed since you began working in China for/with Sterling.
Speaking of "sales". I may not have spent zillions of $$$ with Sterling Gaming over the past years but you can certainly count on future purchases being zero. You can credit that directly to the subject of this thread.
This just isn't right John! IMO of course!
Of course it isn't right. My attitude has not changed in the least. I don't like the copies. IF I ever use any elements of someone else's design then I damn sure will make it better and distinctively mine.
Jack can ***** all he wants to but he is far less likely to see a drop in his annual sales than I did. Since Instroke copies and Bunjee copies flooded the market I have lost millions of dollars. Not a couple thousand. I bet Jack's production won't change a bit and he will still make and sell as many cases per year as he wants to.
I don't condone blatant copying and I don't condone hypocrisy. So if you want to complain about poor Jack then complain about the other good folks in this business who are getting RIPPED off every day. I am sorry but if you all can't see fit to condemn ALL sorts of design theft then don't go nuts over this one.
You may not spend any money with Sterling but Sterling won't stop supporting the sport of pool. Scott Taylor invented the Laser Cue and he is being RIPPED OFF right now by Harvard Sports. Of course AZ could care less about that because the laser cue is a gimmick anyway right?
Well the laser cue that Scott invented, the CueSight branded one, is directly responsible for the fact that 18 American families get a paycheck every week, it paid for a half dozen pro players in various ways for several years, it paid for and continues to pay for the sponsorship of many leagues, tournaments, charity events and tour sponsorships in the billiard world. Do you care that Sterling Gaming is losing money to the sales of infringing copies of Scott's invention? Probably not. When was the last time Harvard Sport sponsored anything in the billiard industry?
I spent years fighting the copies, with marketing, personal letters, crusades, and stupidly with lawyers. It's nonsense. Because EVEN IF you own the design patents and the trademarks it is STILL on you to defend your rights and you must PAY UP FRONT to do that with very little chance of ever recovering the tiniest fraction of what you lost. And you know what consumers don't care, retailers don't care. They don't. It's disheartening. At least Jack doesn't have to hear from a plethora of dealers that so and so importer is trying to sell them x-case for half the price EVEN though they are also distributors of the Original Product. That takes balls to sell the original product AND then go and copy it and sell it alongside the original.
You are doing yourself a disservice if you stop doing business with Sterling. You will be hard pressed to find a more 'dedicated to their customers' bunch of folks. But if you want to punish them because you disagree with me then go ahead. Unlike most of you I have the experience that backs up my point of view and have lost the money to be able to express that opinion freely.