A standard place that it is shown is where the object ball is almost frozen to the cushion and the cue ball is almost frozen to the object ball. It is hard for most people to play a safe on that ball and not foul. The "stick lift" "shot" avoids the double hit.What exactly is the purpose of this shot? Where are the balls lying to make this a clever move? Just want to make sure I'm clear on what's trying to be accomplished with it.
A standard place that it is shown is where the object ball is almost frozen to the cushion and the cue ball is almost frozen to the object ball. It is hard for most people to play a safe on that ball and not foul. The "stick lift" "shot" avoids the double hit.
metmot...That's a much better option...and always legal. I believe there are only a limited number of times you can play that shot, before you must make one of the two balls strike another rail after contact.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
I have to disagree, Scott. That is obviously an intentional miscue. There are ways to hit it legal, but I wouldn't call that one of them.
It looked like an intentional miscue to me too...
No, that's also a foul. It is an intentional miscue. It is also a standard shot at snooker (I'm told) but at snooker it is not a foul to miscue intentionally.
Edit: it sure looks to me like the shot is played so far from center that a miscue is guaranteed. It would be much better to have a shot from overhead. I do know that some people play shots that look just like the one in the video with the intention of miscuing. The way I saw it demonstrated (by a snooker champion) is that the shot is lined up with part of the tip outside the arc of the cue ball.
I'll have to check that out, but, in reference to your last statement, an intentional miscue is a serious foul. (unsportsmanlike conduct)
I can't seem to find any language in the current BCA rule book that indicates that this type of a hit is a foul.
8.18 Miscue
A miscue occurs when the cue tip slides off the cue ball possibly due to a contact that is too eccentric or to insufficient chalk on the tip. It is usually accompanied by a sharp sound and evidenced by a discoloration of the tip. Although some miscues involve contact of the side of the cue stick with the cue ball, unless such contact is clearly visible, it is assumed not to have occurred. A scoop shot, in which the cue tip contacts the playing surface and the cue ball at the same time and this causes the cue ball to rise off the cloth, is treated like a miscue. Note that intentional miscues are covered by 6.16 Unsportsmanlike Conduct (c).
I can't seem to find any language in the current BCA rule book that indicates that this type of a hit is a foul. It is neither double nor extended contact with the tip (push shot) nor does it hit any other part of the cue other than the tip. The stoke is forward and the tip hits the cue ball no further to the edge horizontally than many masse shot attempts do vertically. I can't seem to find a definitive guideline for what part of the cue ball you are allowed to hit with your tip on a forward stroke, just that it can't be a double hit or push shot. Since the tip is very curved at the edge by stroking slow the cue ball is leaving the curved part of the tip instantly in a direction perpendicular to the rounded surface of the tip contact point, guided by the friction of the chalk. Maybe I can slow the original video down frame by frame to calculate if the tip is in contact with the cue ball longer on the side shots than the little nip shot he did in the middle of the clip at about the same speed. It was shot at 30 frames per second I believe so it may be fast enough to be revealing frame by frame.
This is false for the similar shots I've seen in person.... The stoke is forward and the tip hits the cue ball no further to the edge horizontally than many masse shot attempts do vertically. ...
The BCA has adopted the World Standardized rules. Miscues are covered under rule 8.18 of the World Rules:
This is false for the similar shots I've seen in person.
The goal of the shot is to make the cue ball move more or less perpendicular to the cue stick. That does not happen without a miscue, in my experience.
But it comes down to how the ref and TD rule. And while they are allowed to explain rules it's pretty much impossible for them to tell you if a shot in the future will be considered a miscue.
I have to disagree, Scott. That is obviously an intentional miscue. There are ways to hit it legal, but I wouldn't call that one of them.
It is certainly a 'grey' area.
Some practice on 'nurse' caroms would help in these situations.
I don't play short rail billiards but I do practice the nurse and it
comes in handy once in a while.
Had a player roll up on a 9-ball once...he gave up pretty quick when
he saw I was more comfortable with close hits.....he rolled up table
and left me a makeable shot.
Here are a couple masters who you better not lock horns with.
First one is the great Walter Lindrum...
..http://www.google.ca/url?url=http:/...indrum&usg=AFQjCNGY_Ym6Z4OWd7EYFH4DctQm4QBc2Q
This one is on a carom table...
..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAuBqd3OG9I&feature=related