It appears that you see things one way and that way is your way, if others don't see it the same way, well, then they are absolutely wrong.
That is not what I was trying to say. I was trying to say that people do not take the entire contents of the rule book and apply it. Instead they may take a little snipit of it. Example: APA team manual has a BIH section listing a-j as the only BIH fouls that can be committed, all others are sportsmanship issues. So some attempt to claim anything not explicitly mentioned in that section does not result in a BIH foul because if it did, it would be there. A double hit is not in that listing, it is mentioned above it as a foul though. So what kind of foul since it is not in the BIH foul section? See where I am coming from now?
If you were told by the APA office that the upward motion of the tip is considered a legal stroke and is not a foul, then I will not argue it is.