I think it's amazing that 1 dollar from every league player isn't put into a slush fund to create a base a for professional players association/tour.
Who knows? Any thoughts?
That would be too much like RIGHT !
I think it's amazing that 1 dollar from every league player isn't put into a slush fund to create a base a for professional players association/tour.
Who knows? Any thoughts?
concerning the APA IMO i can live with the 23 rule although not my favorite rule. but when you force players to be handicapped and possibly match up against a low SL I think the APA should get rid of the any pocket rule, I mean if a 7 has to play a 2 or a 3 its like a 6 to 2 race luck shots should not have a place in a situation like this. we all want to win and I hear constant comments about the any pocket a-hole rule. This is why i am not a fan of 9 ball as I can't recover from someones lucky unintentional shot Just my opinion
I can't disagree with you on this point. Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart made a product that brings new players into the sport and a business with over a quarter million customers. They worked their tails off 31 years ago to build their idea into a business. That business has grown steadily for the entire length of its existence. Many many people in this country have made a lot more money by doing less. Don't make them out as thieves - they earned their reward. If it was easy, don't you think a lot more people would have done it?
Sure they do. Every one of them can change the rules to something everyone likes, by creating their own organization. Actually, it should only take one, right? Once such an organization exists, certainly all but that DAMN few would flock right to it, wouldn't they? I guess that explains why there are so many wildly successful APA knockoffs. The knockoffs all start out the same way - copy APA, but change a few rules you think nobody likes. The concept sells well at first, but you soon find out that it's a lot more work than you thought, and if you want to sustain it you have to change some of the rules back. You also find out that you've attracted all of the worst cheaters from the APA league, and your change to eliminate the 23 rule didn't make them want to stop cheating at all! You get a handful of stacked teams, and those teams try to gain an advantage over each other by doing what? SANDBAGGING. Go ahead, take that national. When you're done banging your head against the wall, come back and tell us how much money Terry Bell and Larry Hubbart have been "stealing".
That has been discussed here before. Take the best player you know and the worst player you know, and match them up. What would the spot need to be to make it an even money match? There isn't enough time in a league night to play races that long. So, you do the next best thing - acknowledge that the stronger player has the advantage in a shorter race, and take measures to keep teams from stacking themselves with the stronger players.
Are you talking about a scratch division, with no handicaps, or a handicapped division with no cap? Either way, given the time constraints, the best players will join forces and dominate, which probably means there won't be a division to move into.
It doesn't have to be a good alternative to be the best alternative. To date, it is the only alternative that doesn't result in dominant teams that kill your league, and it's been in effect long enough that SOMEONE would have thought of something better by now, if something better existed. Contrary to what you believe, I don't like it when teams have to break up. Do I get more teams out of it? Sometimes. But sometimes I lose a team or at the least some players. It sucks for the team, and it sucks for me too.
We'll come back to this one later...Ah some more APA propaganda
lets not be confused the apa is a business and like every business it is in it for a profit no more no less and at the end of the day thats all that matters,
the 23 rule designed to expand the pyramid is a concept that builds from the bottom up , the theory is by raising players up it forces them to look for low level players and the best way to do that is bring in new players
lets not be confused TAP is a business and like every business it is in it for a profit no more no less and at the end of the day thats all that mattersThis would explain why there are so many 7s now that would not even be good 6s 10yrs ago when being a 7 meant something, unlike tap where it still does,
The notion that the APA is the only fair league to play in and all others are full of APA cheaters who got caught cheating is ridiculous to say the least
and has someone come up with something better , well that would be open for interpretation , by a pure money back in player pocket chances no probably not, but for the players and teams TAP is shooter friendly the 25 rule allows teams to have room for players to go up promoting less sandbagging and also for teams to stay together longer, not good for TAP but good for the players and hey the rally in the Valley in Valley Forge is the best venue in the country from a pure pool shooting perspective
I think you misunderstood my point. I was talking about increasing the spot to make the 7-2 match an even money bet. The race isn't any longer for the weaker player. They still need only 2, but the other guy now needs 20. You can't tell me it's easier to get to 20 than it is to get to 7, because you have to get to 7 on your way to 20! There just isn't enough time to play 20-2 races.Also the notion that the stronger player has a bigger advantage in a short race could not be farther from the truth, the longer the race the more separation as the better player often has another gear that's harnessed by a short race
I'd say that's almost accurate. We have things for the better players, like the Masters format and the U.S. Amateur, but the U.S. Amateur is a once-a-year thing that ANYONE can play in and the Masters format is hard to sustain because of the dominant team problem that the 23 rule addresses.At the end of the day the APA is a family type league good for the beginner and intermediate player but not so good for better player
I am often in regional tournaments where they kid u about being a APA player
its a market they are missing because of thier lack of courtship for the better players so they end up dropping out seaking a alternitive to bring thier game to the next level
We'll come back to this one later...
Ah some more anti-APA propaganda
The 23 rule is the only proven way to keep teams from becoming dominant AND give beginners a chance. 25 doesn't do it - TAP has a problem with dominant teams. And since 25 in TAP is really 30 in APA, there's no need for beginners at all.
Perhaps just having different "divisions" for teams with a higher total skill level. Just off the top of my head, say, oh, I don't know, how about "Open", "Masters", and "Grand Masters"? Be careful with that, pretty soon you're gonna be adding another division between "Open" and "Masters" (let's call that one "Advanced") because some teams are dominating in the "Open" division but have no chance in the "Masters" division, and that's causing players and teams to quit. But when you add that "Advanced" division you're gonna force some teams to restructure. Wait a minute - did you just force teams to restructure, teams of friends who have been playing together for a long time? Why that's, that's, SACRILEGE. You're only doing that to get more participation! Brilliant business model, motivated solely by greed, right? There's no concern at all about providing a structure where everyone can compete, is there? That's just propaganda, koolaid.
lets not be confused TAP is a business and like every business it is in it for a profit no more no less and at the end of the day thats all that matters
Oh, and how many beginners do they bring into the sport every year?
I think you misunderstood my point. I was talking about increasing the spot to make the 7-2 match an even money bet. The race isn't any longer for the weaker player. They still need only 2, but the other guy now needs 20. You can't tell me it's easier to get to 20 than it is to get to 7, because you have to get to 7 on your way to 20! There just isn't enough time to play 20-2 races.
I'd say that's almost accurate. We have things for the better players, like the Masters format and the U.S. Amateur, but the U.S. Amateur is a once-a-year thing that ANYONE can play in and the Masters format is hard to sustain because of the dominant team problem that the 23 rule addresses.
I would say APA is not so good for SOME better players. There are some really good players who get something out of APA league play besides competition or game improvement. Some really enjoy the opportunities it gives them to coach. Others use it as an opportunity to enjoy the game with a spouse or family members who maybe aren't so good. Not every good player has to be super-competitive all the time.
It's really hard to be everything to everybody. Sometimes you have to choose a target market. APA's target market is recreational players who want to have fun with friends and family playing pool. You don't have to be a bad player to fall into that group, but if you're a good player you may have to choose which friends and family you play with.
I agree about how many beginners the tap brings in, since I was a7 in tap and am a 7 in the apa , I am speaking from a higher level view point,
I know TAP does not bring in the beginner level as often as APA does, part of that is they are not as valuable, almost every APA team would love to have a 2 not the same case in TAP. yes it does hurt the new player input
but it creates a better quality in the teams across the board and not such a watered down league ,and not as many 1-1/2 hour 2-2 races ,
there are many business that expanding is not at the head of the list, have good management and profits will still come
Dont tell me the APA does not have dominate teams I no more that one captain that has been to Vegas double digits , I dont know any TAP captains that can claim the same,
I would say the insertion of the master type league is offering some hope for better players in the future,
I would like to see a little more available cash in there monthly tour stops and this would help fill a void for the better players, I would also like to see the tuneys go to full handicap races, making it a good practice venue for those who shoot open turneys where the races are min 7 games
I agree that the APA target player is the recreational player, but they are leaving a lot of money on the table by not being more friendly to the upper level market which is growing day by day
I know sometimes its nice to be the big fish in the small pond which I am
but every now and then Nemo likes to swim in the open ocean and not get swallowed up by sharks creating a more competitive atmosphere for players like me ,by being better prepared it would make the trip in open waters less worrisome
onestroke
Are you from Frederick MD.?
Well I agree the "23 rule" is a problem, it has some good points. It forces teams to play weaker players. It prevents teams from loading up with all A players. Sandbagging would go on regardless, it happens in tournaments and in the gambling world.As I've often said on here, I think the root of the problem is the "23 rule" which causes a situation where people are forced to sandbag if they want to keep their team intact! This has ruined league play for most of the serious players which just leaves the bangers and the "educated cheaters" who have figured out how to keep their handicaps low enough while still winning enough matches to snag that "BIG CARROT", their trip to Vegas! The same teams go almost every year. You know the ones in your area that I'm talking about. What in my opinion really makes it a shame is that the sport is suffering, overall, because of the "23 Rule" and it's only real purpose is to divide the teams thus creating more teams to pay the weekly dues to the APA, making Larry Hubbart and Terry Bell very rich, while the rest of the players and the sport itself suffers. Those who continue to play and donate to the guys in ST. Louis are the ones who deserve what they get! I personally feel we pool players should unite and BOYCOTT the APA until they change the system to reward players for improving rather than punish them!
NO, the APA isn't what we make of it, IT'S OBVIOUSLY WHAT TERRY BELL AND LARRY HUBBART MADE IT! If that's your cup of tea, more power to you! But I really think that while there are a LOT of APA players, DAMN few are happy with the rules, but they have no power to change them!
If you're in any league for the money, you better get a JOB! The money really doesn't matter to me except for the fact that I don't like to be cheated, and I feel the "23 rule" is cheating in a way. It's like the Casinos telling you that you can play for an hour normally but after that you have to play 2 hands instead of one by bringing in another player and they keep all the ante. They are greedy and do not care if their policy is good for pool or not as long as they get rich in the process! Instead of a 23 rule, make the handicap system level the playing field. OR have an OPEN DIVISION FOR TEAMS WITH HANDICAPS OVER A CERTAIN NUMBER. Then if a team reaches that point they would have to move over the next session, provided there was a division to move into! Anything but forcing them to break up! That in my mind is really the key issue! That is punishing them for improving or for not sandbagging! I just don't see how anyone could find that a good alternative! This is all I'm going to say on the subject, it's been beat to death already, and I'm tired of trying to explain to people how this is really bad for pool. If you don't get it, you just don't get it!
Actually a pool hall can make money on tournaments if they are structured and ran right. I used to run tournaments in my pool room on Monday and Tuesday nights that were very successful and Monday and Tuesdays were by FAR my best nights easily surpassing the weekends. I had a race to 1 DBL elim 9 ball tourney on Mon night and Tues it was draw partners and alternate shot (Cincinnati Partners) 9-ball race to 1 dbl elim. The entry fee was only $7 with $2 of that going into the "jackpot" the rest paid out to the tourney winners. I'd get 30-50 players each night! I'd also add $20 each tourney to the jackpot fund which was what really brought the players out. The Jackpot was such: There were up to 2 names drawn each night and tournament winners were not in the draw to shoot at the jackpot. Didn't take long for the jackpot to reach $1000, where we cut the first jackpot off and started a second one so that if/when someone hit the JP the tourney wouldn't die because there was another one behind it for backup. To win, we racked up a 9-ball rack on the tightest table in the house and you had to either make the 9 on the break, a legal combo or run out from the break. No one was barred out. The race to 1 was a great equalizer and the draw partners had people hoping to draw Gary Spaeth or one of the other top players for their partners, and it was still a race to 1. Oh and I forgot to mention that in order to keep the players coming to the tourneys, we had a rule that to be eligible for the full jackpot, you had to have played in 2 out of the last 4 tournaments. If you were a first timer you could only win half of the jackpot amount. This also gave them incentive to make as many tournaments as possible without keeping newer players from winning a good sum too.
This format works well and will fill up a poolroom on dead nights as well. If anyone is interested in trying it in their pool rooms, feel free to contact me and I'll be glad to help them through the details.
A lot of good comments in here. I never expected to get rich off of playing APA, nor do I expect it if I start doing just tournaments or gambling. Pool is my hobby and I love the sport so I play. I just looked at it as I can spend $15 a night to play double jeopardy on league or spend that $15 on entering a local tournament. If i place in the tournament, I will have played more, and have some cash when I leave. If I play well in league, I may get a patch or two, and if my team does good enough I could get a plaque or chance to compete for Vegas. But just receiving the same old plaques and patches that I have too many of is just ridiculous. I mean, what can one person do with 10 or more 9 on the break patches anyway? I actually quit collecting them. What is the point? They are too small for coasters, and not soft enough to make a quilt out of. And plaques,between me and my wife we have about 20 of them, and from being on the same team there are a lot of duplicates. Why would we want to hang 20 plaques that are all either green or blue on our walls. They all look the same except for dates and some names! It just seems like the money could be spent in better ways. Hell, a trophy would be a refresher over the damn plaques.
My favorite comment by far has to be in reference to why is there a 23 rule if the "Equalizer Handicap System" is promoted to level the playing field so anyone can win. The 23 rule is there to force players that get better to recruit new players to make handicap. Plain and simple, that is it. Its actually a brilliant business move that has obviously helped grow the APA and has introduced a lot of new players into the sport. However, it does suck having to break up teams, and it does feel like you get penalized for a team that gets better. I don't like that aspect of it at all, but if it helps grow the sport than so be it.
As far as other leagues, APA is the only league left in Raleigh. It is huge too, over 2,000 members, and the city tournaments use 2 pool halls and take 3 days. We had TAP league which fizzled out after a couple of sessions a few years back, and we had another league based out of Charlotte called "8 Ball Express" that we chased out of Raleigh. My team was paying in the finals in Charlotte for $10K against a team of all 3's and one 4. Their 3's we outshooting my 5's. One masse'd the cue from being hooked on the bottom rail to make the 9 ball in with no time outs, another one of them did 3 long rail banks in a row, and they were winning in 0 to 2 innings max. The league owner/operator and a local "judge" both watched this and said they shot like 3's. I would have hated to see their 4 play who had just moved down from being a 5! Needless to say our team and almost every other team in the Raleigh area quit. The following session there were just not enough teams left and 8-Ball Express has not been back to Raleigh since.
All in all though, it is still just not fun for me anymore. I use to always look forward to league nights, but lately its more of a headache being there than fun. Too many people are no shows, then when you have your team there the other team is missing players. One day I may return to play league, who knows what the future will hold. I just know I want to get away from it for now.
Your little U.S.M.C sign, let's us know what kind of little liberal whiner you must be. Those misguided children as you say protect your worthless ass every day so you can be a whiner. as usual the success of someone else is something you left wing idiots just can't stand. The best thing you can do is donate at the tournaments you mention. you have found a great forum to ***** and complain as there is a nice little group that will welcome your negative trash and support you all the way.
Sounds like YOU might be the problem if your own players don't show up on a regular basis. doesn't look like you will have to worry
about playing much longer in the league, I will appreciate you donation to my winnings at the next tournament. lol, you whiner
What a whiner, sounds like the APA ended up eating you for dessert in the end. lol go manage another bar or peddle some of your crappy cues. what a joke, boyyyyyy