This cue isn't worth repairing and here's why.
The glue is breaking-down and loosing it's adhesion/bonding properties.
At present, it's happening just at the tips of the points.
The same glue was used throughout the cue's construction which means that eventually, it will all let loose.
This causes me to ponder something I have mentioned before but nobody has commented when I spoke of it.
All of the cues of that era used the same materials and construction...the same adhesives/glues. We
commonly see examples for sale in such condition as the one this thread is about. We know the glue is old, we know it is the same in the ones that are not falling apart, yet a serious premium is paid for cues that are in better condition. When those cues are converted my big name makers the prices can be huge. Cue makers here go on about modern glues and how important that is as well as what an advancement it is yet they seem to think nothing of using a 50-75 year old spliced blank. Any disadvantage in the age of the blank is never mentioned at all.
Wouldn't it be more realistic to say that the cues without lifted points simply have not lifted
yet, that the cues that are not falling apart simply haven't fallen apart
yet?
Take a blank that has sat somewhere for the better part of 50 years and machine it, submit it to environmental changes, and start playing pool with it, meaning stress it...what will happen to it eventually?
I don't really know, it's just something I have mentioned before and I don't remember any cue maker ever directly commenting about it. It seemed to just carry off on the wind.
I have a Brunswick, maybe an early conversion, that is about 100 years old. Seems very solid. But are its days actually numbered? Is it doomed to come apart at the points?
Personally, I think I would be fine with it if a cue maker repaired such lifted points. It seems to me it would be at least as reliable as the original assembly. But that's me....and I am not a cue maker.
.
.