Maybe you’re not familiar with Magical Aiming Forum rules. This is a Safe Space where making sense can cause extreme anxiety and aggressive reactions. Please refrain from it.
pj
chgo
:grin: Well done!
Maybe you’re not familiar with Magical Aiming Forum rules. This is a Safe Space where making sense can cause extreme anxiety and aggressive reactions. Please refrain from it.
pj
chgo
This is a Safe Space where making sense can cause extreme anxiety and aggressive reactions.
pj
chgo
I'll say it CTE 15/30/45 all you need to know.
Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.......you dared type the statement that alludes to a perfect aiming method for pocket billiards.I'll say it CTE 15/30/45 all you need to know.
Oh no...you've done it also.Now you've gone and done it. This is what is now happening in their head and soon to be on here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-22tna7KHzI
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?
I agree....we could even play on a round table, or pocket balls on an expansive plane with a hole in it and no rails/cushions or borders at all. Look at the hole, look at the cb/ob relationship needed to send the ob to the hole. This should work with fractions, ghostball, Samba, cte, contact points, etc.....
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?
Since there are no pool tables in existence with the dimensions you posted, who cares. It's not worth the mental energy to think about it.
However since you're now harping about CTE again with some goofy dimensions and obscure math problem, I'd say the math adds up to you baiting for some good old fashion CTE shit stirring.
I know, it's just an "innocent" question, right?
Some people are curious and like to exercise their brains. Others don't want to expend mental energy. To each his own.
Now, now, Spider Dave. You know the forum rules. I'm not going to be baited into a debate that is forbidden. I posted a link to a math problem and all of a sudden it is about CTE. If you would just let people have their own opinions, even if they disagree with you, and let it be there would be fewer arguments.
Now, now, Spider Dave. You know the forum rules. I'm not going to be baited into a debate that is forbidden.
You're the one who BAITED in your very first post when you started the thread by mentioning CTE.
I posted a link to a math problem and all of a sudden it is about CTE. If you would just let people have their own opinions, even if they disagree with you, and let it be there would be fewer arguments.
LMAO YOU mentioned CTE in your initial post. YOU started it. Why? Did you not think your thread would make it off the first page unless you mentioned CTE.
Attention seeker
CTE works on specific right angles on a 2x1 surface. You know this yet you continue to try to spread bad information.
PS is today the day you use poolology, since you only bother with it occasionally.
The visuals aren't dependent upon or restricted by the location of rails or pockets, so there is absolutely no reason this couldn't be used on a square table, or a round table, or in a wide open field using cantaloupes or tomatoes.
How about POST # 28 at the end of the second page?
Yesterday, 03:17 PM
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?
"INNOCENT" Dan White
CTE uses specific visuals between the CB and OB, as determined by the user based on a specific shot...in other words, based on the relationship between the cb, ob, and desired pocket. The visuals are between the cb and ob. These are specific visuals that do not include any rails or pockets. The visuals align your body to a specific view/perception of cb to ob relationship. The sweeps or pivots thin or thicken this relationship as needed to pocket the ball. The visuals aren't dependent upon or restricted by the location of rails or pockets, so there is absolutely no reason this couldn't be used on a square table, or a round table, or in a wide open field using cantaloupes or tomatoes.
You went from blue to red. I guess you're really mad?
Nope. Just trying to make it stand out so YOU can see what you wrote as well as a legally blind person who has minimal vision.
Anyway, I'm not engaging in any CTE bashing no matter how hard you try to muddy the waters.
You're engaging in something with an ulterior motive because you keep posting the letters CTE and referring to it in POST #1, POST #28, and another one in the middle to VORPAL.
You can have the last word, as usual.