Math Problem

This is a Safe Space where making sense can cause extreme anxiety and aggressive reactions.

pj
chgo


Many here and elsewhere have experienced these aggressive reactions for as long as 20+ years. The extreme anxiety and reactions seem to be set off by 3 specific letters of the alphabet arranged in a certain pattern. I dare not specify those letters because it could set off a firestorm when seen by those it makes no sense to.
 
Last edited:
I'll say it CTE 15/30/45 all you need to know.
Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.......you dared type the statement that alludes to a perfect aiming method for pocket billiards.
The ubiquitous "they" will go into hissy fits.
Shame...shame...shame at you for this transgression. See a priest right away and confess to avoid eternal damnation. :smile::smile::smile::shocked:
(just clowning with you a little, my man, that's all)
Life goes on....stay happy.
:thumbup:
 
Sinclair Lewis speaks...........

Now you've gone and done it. This is what is now happening in their head and soon to be on here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-22tna7KHzI
Oh no...you've done it also.
*Lowenstein does his Elmer Gantry impression*----- "Sin, Sin, Sin.......you're all SINNERS. Especially UUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, Mister Spiderman.
:rotflmao::happydance:

Elmer Gantry.jpg
 
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?
 
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?

But haven't you stated you know everything about CTE. So why the question.
 
I agree....we could even play on a round table, or pocket balls on an expansive plane with a hole in it and no rails/cushions or borders at all. Look at the hole, look at the cb/ob relationship needed to send the ob to the hole. This should work with fractions, ghostball, Samba, cte, contact points, etc.....

CTE works on specific right angles on a 2x1 surface. You know this yet you continue to try to spread bad information.

PS is today the day you use poolology, since you only bother with it occasionally.
 
Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?

Since there are no pool tables in existence with the dimensions you posted, who cares. It's not worth the mental energy to think about it.

However since you're now harping about CTE again with some goofy dimensions and obscure math problem, I'd say the math adds up to you baiting for some good old fashion CTE shit stirring.

I know, it's just an "innocent" question, right?
 
Since there are no pool tables in existence with the dimensions you posted, who cares. It's not worth the mental energy to think about it.

Some people are curious and like to exercise their brains. Others don't want to expend mental energy. To each his own.

However since you're now harping about CTE again with some goofy dimensions and obscure math problem, I'd say the math adds up to you baiting for some good old fashion CTE shit stirring.

I know, it's just an "innocent" question, right?

Now, now, Spider Dave. You know the forum rules. I'm not going to be baited into a debate that is forbidden. I posted a link to a math problem and all of a sudden it is about CTE. If you would just let people have their own opinions, even if they disagree with you, and let it be there would be fewer arguments.
 
Some people are curious and like to exercise their brains. Others don't want to expend mental energy. To each his own.



Now, now, Spider Dave. You know the forum rules. I'm not going to be baited into a debate that is forbidden. I posted a link to a math problem and all of a sudden it is about CTE. If you would just let people have their own opinions, even if they disagree with you, and let it be there would be fewer arguments.

LMAO YOU mentioned CTE in your initial post. YOU started it. Why? Did you not think your thread would make it off the first page unless you mentioned CTE.
Attention seeker
 
Now, now, Spider Dave. You know the forum rules. I'm not going to be baited into a debate that is forbidden.

You're the one who BAITED in your very first post when you started the thread by mentioning CTE.

I posted a link to a math problem and all of a sudden it is about CTE. If you would just let people have their own opinions, even if they disagree with you, and let it be there would be fewer arguments.

You're the one who made it about CTE in the first post and the last post before this one which was POST #28 when you said this:

Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?

THAT'S YOUR POST, DANNY BOY. POST #28

Dan White
 
Last edited:
LMAO YOU mentioned CTE in your initial post. YOU started it. Why? Did you not think your thread would make it off the first page unless you mentioned CTE.
Attention seeker


How about POST # 28 at the end of the second page?


Yesterday, 03:17 PM

Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?

"INNOCENT" Dan White
 
Last edited:
CTE works on specific right angles on a 2x1 surface. You know this yet you continue to try to spread bad information.

PS is today the day you use poolology, since you only bother with it occasionally.

CTE uses specific visuals between the CB and OB, as determined by the user, based on a specific shot...in other words, based on the relationship between the cb, the ob, and the desired pocket. The visuals are between the cb and ob. These are specific visuals that do not include any rails or pockets. The visuals align your body to a specific view/perception of cb to ob relationship. The sweeps or pivots thin or thicken this relationship as needed to pocket the ball. The visuals aren't dependent upon or restricted by the location of rails or pockets, so there is absolutely no reason this couldn't be used on a square table, or a round table, or in a wide open field using cantaloupes or tomatoes.
 
Last edited:
The visuals aren't dependent upon or restricted by the location of rails or pockets, so there is absolutely no reason this couldn't be used on a square table, or a round table, or in a wide open field using cantaloupes or tomatoes.

mohrt has a different take on it. Maybe he'll chime back in to explain.
 
How about POST # 28 at the end of the second page?


Yesterday, 03:17 PM

Interesting observation... Lots of kvetching going on here yet nobody seems to have an answer to the question. Why won't CTE work on a table that is not 2:1 like those in my math problem?

"INNOCENT" Dan White

You went from blue to red. I guess you're really mad? Anyway, I'm not engaging in any CTE bashing no matter how hard you try to muddy the waters. You can have the last word, as usual.
 
CTE uses specific visuals between the CB and OB, as determined by the user based on a specific shot...in other words, based on the relationship between the cb, ob, and desired pocket. The visuals are between the cb and ob. These are specific visuals that do not include any rails or pockets. The visuals align your body to a specific view/perception of cb to ob relationship. The sweeps or pivots thin or thicken this relationship as needed to pocket the ball. The visuals aren't dependent upon or restricted by the location of rails or pockets, so there is absolutely no reason this couldn't be used on a square table, or a round table, or in a wide open field using cantaloupes or tomatoes.



I said long ago there are enough similarities in my shadow thing and cte I always thought that it could be used off a table. Lol john Barton posted a video once about aiming trashcans and stuff outside it was funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
You went from blue to red. I guess you're really mad?

Nope. Just trying to make it stand out so YOU can see what you wrote as well as a legally blind person who has minimal vision.

Anyway, I'm not engaging in any CTE bashing no matter how hard you try to muddy the waters.

You're engaging in something with an ulterior motive because you keep posting the letters CTE and referring to it in POST #1, POST #28, and another one in the middle to VORPAL.

You can have the last word, as usual.

I insist, you can bring CTE up one more time since it's been too quiet in this forum for too long and you're suffering from withdrawal symptoms.

Go nuts Danny Boy.
 
Back
Top