are you really representing Matlock here?
because if I were him I think I'd be a little pissed about the representation I was getting
because if I were him I think I'd be a little pissed about the representation I was getting
Matlock is tired of all of the lies..
- Thread starter roosterman
- Start date
No...actually SEVERAL races to nine tells who the best player is...in that tournament, on that day!
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
roosterman said:
BVal said:
It's like he has a 9 year old with the good old "my dad could beat your dad" mentality
BTW, how did you like "breakfast at Kolby's" :grin:
Scott Lee said:
I think we've all been beaten by people that we were suppose to beat.I beat Waldon in a tournament and I would'nt play with the 6.A tournament does'nt prove who the best player is.
bigskyjake said:
Why do you hate Matlock all you've done is talk bad about everthing I've talked about.All David wants to do is set some records straight that was posted on this form you can either believe them or,not.He's at Shooters in Olathe right now call him and ask him yourselves.
roosterman said:
I don't hate Matlock at all, however you're coming off like a real ass
I can not possibly believe that David is liking the fact that you are on here bantering back and forthe with everyone on his behalf. I don't know himpersonally but he has always seemed rather quite and unassuming, not the yelling and bragging type. This whole deal seems a little weird, especially the part where you are calling Keith a liar. Keith may be or has been many things but he isn't widely known as a stright up liar. I have heard quite a few of his tales and all have been substantiated.
BTW--- get Dave's beanbag out of your jaw.
BTW--- get Dave's beanbag out of your jaw.
Scott Lee said:Roosterman...Give it a rest! You can no more prove that David Matlock has never lost, than we can prove that he has. MOST of the top players have lived in drug or alcohol induced hazes for much of their lives. I would doubt that ANY of these players can remember accurately what happened 20 years ago.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
LOL...
Russ
Attachments
Bad representation??
How is roosterman giving David a bad rep? He has yet to curse, swear, or demean any players or the posters on this forum. Roosterman is a life long friend, opponent, and fan. He talks to David weekly sometimes and the last few days has been delivering messages on David's behalf. Again, he is not trying to call people out necessarily, but set the record straight. I'll tell you how he represents David, he only helped stake him in the big bar table ring game on TAR. How well do you guys know your player? He knows what he's talking about!bigskyjake said:
Biased opinion..
As always, an instructor tries to explain how to determine a great player. Playing long ahead sets is really the way to determine who is the better player. Yes, you can ascertain alot from tournament winnings, but if i was to compare Charlie Williams to David Matlock in recent times (just for pure example), Charlie has had better tournament finishes. However, if you were to lock them in a room for 3 days, Charlie would be broke and mentally destroyed. To many variables to contain with in a short period of time. There is no way that a tournament always determines the best player!Scott Lee said:
Keith
With all due respect. If you beat david in OKC in under an hour, i guarantee you would got another 1 or 2 sessions fired right back at you. During this time, if you could beat David,you could bust the whole state of Oklahoma. I assure you; the okies thought David Matlock was the greatest thing next to sliced bread. He had some of the biggest pockets at that time. Several oil men who thought they were being naughty for staking pool players and got their rocks off, doing it. And if you did indeed beat him like you said you did, I promise they would be flipping the coin for the next set. Now Keith i do remember when you beat James Walden handily for about 10,000, i was in OKC when you did it, didn't see it but i heard about it. I think you could have the games and the guys confused. Because David says it never happened this way.. Again, no disrespect to you Keith. I used to watch you all of the time down at the Cue-Topia along with Mark Tadd and others. Hell, you even knocked me out of game with a Big drug dealer ( i still can't remember his name) I talked to you several times, and you knew me, so, again, i don't want you to feel disrespected about my comments.Keith McCready said:
clint3612 said:
No disrespect intended, but I think there would be huge interest in a matchup where Scott Lee plays Alex Pagulayan getting the 5 out in a race to 50 for $10,000.
I think this would be a great match and great for pool. It could be advertised as the "Teacher vs. Student: The Match of the Century". This could open up an entire new PPV revenue stream for TAR (matches where one player is getting weight). I would pay $$$ to see Scott and Alex battle it out.
Yukon Ed said:
If I spoke Espanoley like the rest of Miami does, maybe i could. All I know is from watching and he has been losing everytime he gets down. What I was really trying to say is that David Matlock in his prime would absolutely stick it to Panchito (the dead in stroke Panchito). His culo would be mucho kicked.
Charlie Williams? Heck...let's lock Matlock in a room with Efren for 3 days, and see who comes out ahead! Efren is a feared money player, as well as an excellent tournament player. If tournaments don't determine who is the better player, then why do the top players still play in them? Why don't they just gamble? Probably because someone will actually come out a winner in the tournament, and take home some cash. The gamblers will break even over time (or, as we all know, more likely go broke...because they won some $$$ playing pool, and then lost it at the track! ).
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
).Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
clint3612 said:
Scott Lee said:Charlie Williams? Heck...let's lock Matlock in a room with Efren for 3 days, and see who comes out ahead! Efren is a feared money player, as well as an excellent tournament player. If tournaments don't determine who is the better player, then why do the top players still play in them? Why don't they just gamble? Probably because someone will actually come out a winner in the tournament, and take home some cash. The gamblers will break even over time (or, as we all know, more likely go broke...because they won some $$$ playing pool, and then lost it at the track!
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Do that on a barbox with a big CB and it could be the next TAR match.
~rc
Hmmmm....Against Alex I think I'd have to have the 2 out, and the snap! Race to 50? 
Damn, that would take days! I have never ever claimed to be a champion player...and so the huge spot would be fair. Back on track...isn't this thread about David Matlock? (certainly not about lil' ole me!).
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Race to 50? Damn, that would take days! I have never ever claimed to be a champion player...and so the huge spot would be fair. Back on track...isn't this thread about David Matlock? (certainly not about lil' ole me!). Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Roadkill said:No disrespect intended, but I think there would be huge interest in a matchup where Scott Lee plays Alex Pagulayan getting the 5 out in a race to 50 for $10,000.
I think this would be a great match and great for pool. It could be advertised as the "Teacher vs. Student: The Match of the Century". This could open up an entire new PPV revenue stream for TAR (matches where one player is getting weight). I would pay $$$ to see Scott and Alex battle it out.
Last edited:
sixpack said:
Will there be monkeys driving around on unicycles, a two headed man, and a ferris wheel?
Seriously, bar box 8-ball with a big cueball these days is akin to trowing a baseball at the 3 standing bottles trying to knock them off to win a stuffed animal. It is a gimmick game, might as well just gamble Bucktooth and his silly keno board or whatever the hell that is.
In a world where you pretty much have to carry around your own big cueball in order to play with one these days you are becoming the master at a gimmick that almost noone plays anymore. It is one step better then getting yourself into the guiness book of world records for just eating peanuts to survive for longer then anyone else in the world.
Now if they played with a normal sized cueball like 99.999% of the world does these days, well I will just say I got $100 on Efren in 8-ball for a 15 ahead set or better. I am pretty sure if backers were contacted Efren could bring the entire net worth of the Phillipines for a match like this.
