Of course, you stating the obvious falsehoods, untruths, and renditions of non-facts over and over and over and over and over again on this thread is not "stirring up trouble" or liking the "controversy" you are causing on this thread -- in your mind. :thumbup:
You can state David is the best player in the world, better than Keith McCready, and that is your right, as you can state your opinion whenever you desire. I don't have any problem with that. I think that is fine and dandy.
David Matlock is a great champion. Is he the best bar box player in the world? That depends on who you ask.
Has he never lost a match on the bar table? The posts from multiple people on this thread show that David, in fact, has lost multiple matches on the bar table in his life.
What does this all mean?
Does it mean Keith McCready is a better bar-box player than Larry Hubbart because he spotted Larry Hubbart two balls and beat him?
Does it mean that Larry Hubbart is a better bar-box player than David Matlock when after Larry Hubbart got beaten by Keith McCready getting spotted two balls, he beat David Matlock
EVEN STEVEN?
If you want to state the falsehoods, untruths, and non-facts over and over again, Clint, then I will reply with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Poor David Matlock. A great American thoroughbred champion being represented on this forum by a Roosterman and a Clint who can't admit they are wrong when confronted with the truth.
Let me say it once more. Pool players get beaten all the time. There is not one player on the face of the earth that I know about who has never lost a match or a game or a tournament set -- NONE, NADDA.
God bless David Matlock. I wish him success in all his future endeavors. :smile:
JAM