The way I understand it / my logic...
All cushins are designed to make contact with the ball below the equater of said ball...
The optimum height for the cushion nose, as determined by people who have studied these things for well over 100 years, is 63.5% of the balls height. (+/-1%)
Obviously this is well above the equator.
Something to think about from Dr. Dave's website:
Q: Why is the height of the rail cushion nose not at the center of the ball?
Here is the rail cushion nose height specification, as dictated by the WPA:
"Rail height (nose-line to table-bed) should be 63 ½% (+1 %) or between 62 ½% and 64 ½ % of the diameter of the ball."
If the cushion nose height were at the ball center (0.5D), instead, rebounding balls would slide more and would hop significantly if they come into the cushion with topspin (especially at fast speed).
Another obvious height would be at the "center of percussion" of the ball (0.7D), per TP 4.2, so the rebounding balls would tend to roll away from the rails more naturally. However, this height would tend to drive a rebounding ball down into the table, which would tend to slow the ball more, accelerate cloth wear (and faster formation of a "rail groove"), and cause the rebounding ball to hop.
The WPA 0.635D offers a good compromise between the 0.5D and 0.7D values. This height was determined empirically to result good rebound performance without too much ball hop or cloth wear. "