Mezz WD 700 Shafts

I play with both WD700 and 314^2 and like them both.
Similar LD although 314^2 is slightly better in that department.
However, WD700 has great feel and hit, ball movement is effortless.
If I had to choose one it would be WD700. Highly recommended.
 
In terms of how to get a Bender version of a Mezz WD700:

-buy a 3/8-10 flat face version *I have a newer one for sale.*

-have either Bender or your local cue maker drill out the thread

-refill the thread with phenolic and glue

-retap the thread for your Bender..which I believe is 3/8-14

Any skilled cue maker should be able to help you out.

Correct! Ask a good cuemaker how he would do it- and let him do Joey :) I m very sure he will help you. Every good cuemaker should be able to make a WD700 for your Bender.

lg
INgo
 
I have owned and played with the following LD shafts...

Tiger X
OB-1
Predator
WD-700

I would have to put the WD-700 at the bottom of the list, being in my personal experience the least low deflecting of the four.
I felt the WD-700 to have a somewhat 'softer' hit than the rest of the LD shafts I have played with. I could barely tell any difference in playability between a normal maple shaft and the WD-700. It very well may have been the factory tip, a Moori medium I believe.

My personal favorite is the Tiger X followed closely by the OB-1, both tipped with a Tiger Onyx, I really like that tip.


Steve H.
 
I have owned and played with the following LD shafts...

Tiger X
OB-1
Predator
WD-700

I would have to put the WD-700 at the bottom of the list, being in my personal experience the least low deflecting of the four.
I felt the WD-700 to have a somewhat 'softer' hit than the rest of the LD shafts I have played with. I could barely tell any difference in playability between a normal maple shaft and the WD-700. It very well may have been the factory tip, a Moori medium I believe.

My personal favorite is the Tiger X followed closely by the OB-1, both tipped with a Tiger Onyx, I really like that tip.


Steve H.

It is very interesting about how different people view the properties of a shaft. Thanks for your response.
 
I found the WD700 to be a bit whippy.
However, my shaft was 30" long and not 29".
Also the butt that I have is very heavy at over 17 oz.

So what I feel out of the shaft is most likely very different that what others do.

I needed a siffter shaft.
I would need to hit with the HP II before I buy that one.
 
I love mine, the first time I hit with one I don't think I missed a ball for a half hour.
 
I love mine, the first time I hit with one I don't think I missed a ball for a half hour.

I had the exact same experience test hitting with a wd700 the first time.

One previous member stated their shaft was "Whippy"..in no way could i ever use that in the same sentence with WD700.
 
I mean i like the mezz shafts and i like low deflection shafts BUT:
How on earth can you call them - not - whippy... ?! They have a damn HOLE on the front! :confused::sorry:;);):wink::grin-square::grin::D:thumbup:
 
"Whippy" = Meucci....they never had a hole in front.

Whippy is based off of taper. Which is also equal to stiffness. There are many shafts that are low deflection that are stiff. Equally there are also many maple shafts which have a "whippy" feel to them. All my wd700's hit firm.:) To each their own.
 
Alright mrinsatiable,
must be a question of definition :sorry: :grin-square:.
Might have taken "whipp" for "hit", cause these low deflection shafts are pretty mutch all "no feelers" to me and thats what i wanted to say. The only one worth the term "hit" was the Hybrid Pro II... i mean i bought a nice Timmy Scruggs cue built by the honorable Mike Cochran (good bless this very fine cuemaker) and it had a nice and crisp hit. But as you put a WD700 or 314 shaft on it its aaaallll gone!!!
I mean its not like they have a bad hit... they have NO hit!
But again.. the exception IMHO really is the Hybrid Pro II shafts, even after i had the taper adjusted towards a pro taper!
 
Last edited:
For those of you who have shot with a MEZZ WD 700 shaft, what are your thoughts about its performance. Comparisons would be great as well.

I have always wanted to hit some balls with a Mezz WD700 shaft to see how they play but my Bender cue uses a different thread than what is offered on the MEZZ cue web site.

Thanks,

I thought it hit well. I have a Mezz AXi-N for sale with the WD700 shaft and Moori Tip - New. PM me if anyone is interested.
 
This is not necessarily correct. As all the WD700 shafts I have are of super tight grain count and the wood quality is excellent. When given the opportunity look at all my shafts before purchasing them and hand pick thru them.

I bought a WD700 in Las Vegas directly from Caroline Pao and it was filled with super tight grain lines.

Predator uses the pie shape for two reasons:

1) They market the uniform stability of the shaft from 360 degrees

2) They can use any quality woods and simply cut them into pie pieces and glue them together for their shafts. Therefore no need to find highest quality of shaft wood to complete their products

Mezz on the other hand has uber quality standards and especially the WD700 shafts. I have owned 4 WD700's and all of them were great quality.

I agree with that. Mezz does use high quality wood for all their shafts. Tight grain and well processed. Most players would say WD700 has stiff hitting even though it has only 12.6mm shaft size. It is basically a solid maple wood shaft with a little front part hollowed and foamed. The wood used on it must be good to provide that consistent firm hit.
 
I thought it hit well. I have a Mezz AXi-N for sale with the WD700 shaft and Moori Tip - New. PM me if anyone is interested.

Corey,
Your website has an enormous number of quality products. I had no idea of the vast spread of items that you carry. I like the way you have your website set up.

I am currently enjoying playing with a Steve Lomax shaft that he made especially for my Bender cue and will most likely have Steve make another one for me. I guess I am always thinking about tweaking my equipment and always wondering if a different shaft might have different playability that would be compatible with my style of play and the interest in Mezz cues is just something I have recently acquired. I think I will go to a tournament where there are lots of Mezz cues and either find some cues that I can hit with and determine if the difference is worth switching.

Your prices are excellent but for the moment I don't wish to purchase another cue. It was nice however, to see the large selection you have.

Best regards,
JoeyA
 
For those of you who have shot with a MEZZ WD 700 shaft, what are your thoughts about its performance. Comparisons would be great as well.

I have always wanted to hit some balls with a Mezz WD700 shaft to see how they play but my Bender cue uses a different thread than what is offered on the MEZZ cue web site.

Thanks,

Of the five or four shafts I got in the last two years for low deflection, the Mezz WD700 has the lowest. Although I haven't tried them all, I'm surprised Mezz makes one that is advertised at even lower deflection. That just would seem wrong to me with the ball going backwards all the time.

My test cue is a flat-faced 3/8ths-10 Gilbert, so it's going to hit similarly to your bender I believe. I see no issues with workmanship, taper or hit. The shaft is a winner with its greatest fault with me is that it's squirt is too low for my normal game.

There is only one issue I have with the WD700 - the sealer on it has a little more tack than the other cues. 000 does the trick, but I was surprised how aggressive the sealer is.

Another shaft that is similar to the WD700 in my opinion is the Jacoby Edge.

Here was my initial assessment: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=2333455&postcount=23

Freddie <~~~ make it 2 hours of playing this year
 
Last edited:
Of the five or four shafts I got in the last two years for low deflection, the Mezz WD700 has the lowest. Although I haven't tried them all, I'm surprised Mezz makes one that is advertised at even lower deflection. That just would seem wrong to me with the ball going backwards all the time.

My test cue is a flat-faced 3/8ths-10 Gilbert, so it's going to hit similarly to your bender I believe. I see no issues with workmanship, taper or hit. The shaft is a winner with its greatest fault with me is that it's squirt is too low for my normal game.

There is only one issue I have with the WD700 - the sealer on it has a little more tack than the other cues. 000 does the trick, but I was surprised how aggressive the sealer is.

Another shaft that is similar to the WD700 in my opinion is the Jacoby Edge.

Here was my initial assessment: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=2333455&postcount=23

Freddie <~~~ make it 2 hours of playing this year

I hit with one of these and I like it. I will say that I haven't found any shaft that hits as well as the OB Classic though. That is my opinion but I like it a lot better than the Mezz. I'd like to hit with a Mezz that was lower in weight than the one I hit with. I might give it more praise then...
 
Back
Top