Have any of the two parties ever posted on here in any thread? That point you are trying to make seems well, pointless.
There is a right and a wrong here. If one of the promoters from Galveston has the furniture IN HIS HOUSE - that is wrong. I don't see how anyone could try to twist it differently.
What would be right is if the Galveston promoter would reach out to Mitch instead of Mitch having to do the chasing, say I have your furniture in storage. The cost is $30 a month. I will hold it for one month. Either come and get it, ship it.....or forfeit it.
I don't see how anyone with any common sense could have held this raffle, with most participants being from out of state, and expect them to be able to drive home with their winnings. Arrangements should have been made beforehand to accomodate the winners.
Mitch could probably have this furniture shipped for about $400 if he searched for a carrier.
The markup on the furniture is of no consequence either. They didn't advertise the raffle as win $8,000 worth of furniture which is really like only winning $2,000
Since the furniture is now used as it is sitting in this man's house - standard price would be 40% of retail. Mitch should be offered $3,200.