Obviously, "Monster" is in the eyes of the beholder. Below are two cues I have/had for sale at AZ. I called the one Monster or Big or something like that. The other one I didn't. I don't think I was out of line referring to the Josey as a Monster. All the white is except the ferrules is ivory and I don't believe you need to understand the details of cue making to accept the workmanship and the enormous number of hours it took to make that cue. The second cue is a plain jane Blackcreek. Even though I think most would agree it is a beautiful cue and represents a good eye and workmanship by the maker, I don't see how that could be called a monster. The last cue is from Worminator's site, a Tonkin. Perhaps that fits your definition of a Monster. I struggle to fathom how anyone wouldn't consider that a Monster cue but of course, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
When it gets down to it, what does it matter? If the viewer doesn't think it is a monster cue, don't look at the thread again. Certainly, don't buy the cue. Same thing with a poster or a thread topic. Don't like it, don't view it. You can even put the poster on ignore.
[/URL][/IMG]