This is a suggestion that always puzzles me. Why would John Schmidt, or any other top pro, be interested in cte lessons, even for free? I mean, I can understand how cte might drastically improve a struggling amateur's shot-making capabilities, but just how much can it improve the aim of a top pro, especially one the calibre of Mr. 400? After cte lessons, could he then be expected to run 600, 700, or 800 balls? That's very doubtful. I tend to think there has to be a limitation to the benefits any top pro might expect to receive from cte.
Even Stevie Moore, in his interview with Samm Diep, does not give credit to cte for his improved play - he mentions that Stan changed his grip pressure and taught him some other things ( I got the distinct impression that the "other things" I mention had more to do with learning how to instruct, rather than learning how to play).
Although it may sound like it, I am not trying to bash Stan or cte. I bought Stan's DVD. I study it whenever time allows. I intend to learn CTE/Pro One even though I don't know (at this time, anyway) the full measure of benefits I will receive from it. I do know, however, that it will at least be worth the price I paid for the DVD, even if all I learn is better communication skills.
Stan: You did a good job on the DVD. It can stand on its own merit. You do not have to taint your good image by allowing yourself to be drawn into woofing contests. The same goes for you, Joey.
Roger