I was recently reminded about the orignial concept of the APA at its origin. One dollar was withdrawn from entry fees or tour membership (not sure) and placed in a fund for PROFESSIONAL pool.
Mike Janis of the then-Viking Tour era started the N.U.T.S. for regional tours to, again, hold back one dollar from all entry fees to be put in a fund for players to compete in professional events, e.g., U.S. Open, Skins Billiards Championship, Super Billiards Expo Pro Championship, et cetera. N.U.T.S. stood for National Unified Tour -- something or other. I can't remember.
My first thought is, gee, what happened to all those one dollars collected from N.U.T.S. and the APA. That's a lot of cheesenips over the years. :wink:
Have the leagues and regional tours thrown in the towel on professional pool? Some regional tours have now reconstructed their tours to cater to to amateurs.
I believe this recent trend to accommodate amateur-level competitions is the result of professional-caliber players winning the bulk of these regional tour events, due to the lack of professional competitions. The pros want to make a decent living at being, well, like the name implies, a professional pool player. :grin-square:
The existing lot of American professional players is dwindling. Aside from sponsored players like Johnny Archer and Shane Van Boening, very few can afford to travel the globe today to represent the United States. For Shane and Johnny, that's great; they're going to always be in like Flynn, especially if pool makes it to the Olympics.
Charlie Williams and the Dragon crew seem to be doing okay, and AzBilliards has graciously created the professional player fund. Is this enough to help the American pool constituency be alive and well? I do applaud everybody's efforts for sure.
Is this one-dollar tax a viable platform to promote professional pool? Any other ideas?
Mike Janis of the then-Viking Tour era started the N.U.T.S. for regional tours to, again, hold back one dollar from all entry fees to be put in a fund for players to compete in professional events, e.g., U.S. Open, Skins Billiards Championship, Super Billiards Expo Pro Championship, et cetera. N.U.T.S. stood for National Unified Tour -- something or other. I can't remember.

My first thought is, gee, what happened to all those one dollars collected from N.U.T.S. and the APA. That's a lot of cheesenips over the years. :wink:
Have the leagues and regional tours thrown in the towel on professional pool? Some regional tours have now reconstructed their tours to cater to to amateurs.
I believe this recent trend to accommodate amateur-level competitions is the result of professional-caliber players winning the bulk of these regional tour events, due to the lack of professional competitions. The pros want to make a decent living at being, well, like the name implies, a professional pool player. :grin-square:
The existing lot of American professional players is dwindling. Aside from sponsored players like Johnny Archer and Shane Van Boening, very few can afford to travel the globe today to represent the United States. For Shane and Johnny, that's great; they're going to always be in like Flynn, especially if pool makes it to the Olympics.
Charlie Williams and the Dragon crew seem to be doing okay, and AzBilliards has graciously created the professional player fund. Is this enough to help the American pool constituency be alive and well? I do applaud everybody's efforts for sure.
Is this one-dollar tax a viable platform to promote professional pool? Any other ideas?