Yes and we can bring different shafts, tips, and hell, have you seen Earl and his elbow protection/weights LOL? But we can't swap out cueballs willy-nilly, or racks if the other player objects. That is the core of the issue here, not so much if it's better to use this or that, but given the guidelines provided, which is other tournaments having a set rule for rack use where both players have to agree (outside of CSI which explicitly notes that you can't deny use of the MR, but seeing how they are distributing the thing and it's mandatory in the 9 and 10 ball we can probably leave that out as a factor), plus the fact that there was no rule given out that any of the players can use any rack and you can't say anything, I just don't see how the ref or TD can allow the other player to use the MR over the objection of someone.
Plus we had a CSI trained ref say in the situation given "no way would I allow the MR to be used".
What if one guy wanted to switch tables but one did not? Say if they were assigned that table by the tournament director, Mr A and Mr B, table 4. One guy did not like how the cloth looked and wanted to switch, Mr B said, no I like that table. Then what? If the table was technically fine, no rips, rails were normal, etc... would it be OK to force the switch? I am going to guess that no-one can say "yes force the switch" with any type of solid reason. That is the same thing here, if the rack they used was good, and one guy did not want to allow use of the MR, it should not be over-ruled and be allowed. And if the rack was NOT good, then a suitable regular rack replacement should be found first before they use the MR.
As a neutral party, discounting your own preference for what rack to use or what YOU would do if someone asked to use the MR, with the fact that there are a lot of other tournaments and areas that already made the ruling and said BOTH plyers have to agree and that is the call that a ref would make, there is really only one correct ruling, and the TD in this case did not make that choice. There is huge amount of evidence one way, and mostly personal opinions the other way.
I'm not even saying that the guy was horrible and in idiot for making that call, that it was 100% clear as to what to do because it is not. I would say 80% of the reasoning would sway towards not allowing the MR use. Yes, 20% is that it's a legal rack and it's a good rack and really what is the huge deal, but I think the other 80% that the ruling was already made in a LOT of other places and actual tournaments and that we have a ref saying his call would be not to allow it, well outweighs the other side of things.
Don't worry about it, man. I think the naysayers, as I said, either just aren't good enough for the magic rack to make a difference, or rely on it to make up the difference between themselves and better players.
Plus, they are not even trying to understand that this was not about the winning or losing of the tournament. It was just a cash tournament, no trophy, and only 23 people in it. Last place money got twice their entry fee back, and a significant amount was taken out for "administrative fees", so the payout was fairly skewed. It's about the principal of one guy using a magic rack, getting the speed of the break down in his previous 4-5 matches, and then getting to enforce the use of the rack because a weak TD didn't know enough about running tournaments to make a fair decision.
I have seen even mid-level players play perfect matches with the magic rack. Yeah, I am gonna practice with it, because it is used in national tournaments. And I still argue it should not be forced on a player in a local tournament unless the venue provides one for everyone. If the venue does, then I am completely fine with it...
Short Bus Russ