Here's another possibility - it should be easy to stick the CB to the 5 and possible to put the 3 on your side of the table:
pj
chgo
pj
chgo
Well that would be genius Lenny,if your confident with the cueball.I would be paranoid of scratching.However,I can see stunning the cueball squarely into the 10.Now that would be world class! If you actually pulled it off,it would turn out to be quite an offensive shot.And from this postion,an offensive shot looks impossible.Wiggling looks like my first instinct hereFast Lenny said:I would shoot into the 12 and that would combo the 11 of the 15 into the 1 6 combo,moving a ball the my hole and perhaps making it while also stunning the cue ball off the 12 and hopefully leaving the cue ball by his hole where he cant play the 10 ball,that would be my shot,the 6 looks like it might go.![]()
I think Freddy would disagree with you......LOLCornerman said:I think you were trying to show a shot that the scratch was the right shot. IMO, this isn't one of them. I'm thinking everyone shoots John's shot instead. Sweep the 5 and 7 and stick to the 13.
No doubt that knowing when to shoot the intentional scratch is a powerful bit of knowledge. But overuse is worse.
Fred
Even if you pull the shot off Patrick,you will be in a world of trouble after the next shot.He will have so many traps to choose from.Think about it.Patrick Johnson said:Here's another possibility - it should be easy to stick the CB to the 5 and possible to put the 3 on your side of the table:
pj
chgo
And which point would he possibly disagree?Onepocket73 said:I think Freddy would disagree with you......LOL
I love his commentary
Freddy wholeheartedly believes in intentional scratches.I don't know that he would agree with me on this shot.He may agree with you and JR.I was just thinking out loud...Cornerman said:And which point would he possibly disagree?
Fred
I see you didn't read my post. Freddy wouldn't disagree with my post.Onepocket73 said:Freddy wholeheartedly believes in intentional scratches.I don't know that he would agree with me on this shot.He may agree with you and JR.I was just thinking out loud...![]()
Playing into the 10 is fine too even if you bump into at the speed your supposed to it shouldnt disturb it much,your hitting that combo pretty firmly and alot of the energy should be gone and then the cueball should drift and die towards the pocket.It would be my shot,the only thing else i could see doing is fouling intentionally.Onepocket73 said:Well that would be genius Lenny,if your confident with the cueball.I would be paranoid of scratching.However,I can see stunning the cueball squarely into the 10.Now that would be world class! If you actually pulled it off,it would turn out to be quite an offensive shot.And from this postion,an offensive shot looks impossible.Wiggling looks like my first instinct here![]()
Yeah,I agree.I don't like Jr's shot.It seems too risky.So many bad things can happen.But like I said to him,he is probably a better one-holer than meFast Lenny said:Playing into the 10 is fine too even if you bump into at the speed your supposed to it shouldnt disturb it much,your hitting that combo pretty firmly and alot of the energy should be gone and then the cueball should drift and die towards the pocket.It would be my shot,the only thing else i could see doing is fouling intentionally.
We are talking about Freddy Bentivegna,right?Cornerman said:I see you didn't read my post. Freddy wouldn't disagree with my post.
Again, I figured you were trying to show a shot that led to an intentional scratch. Please read my post again. Then look at Patrick Johnson's new thread/post (shot after the break with no path for the cueball to the opponent's pocket). In Patrick's, an intentional into the pack is a good play.
Fred <~~~Freddy knows that I know that he knows that I know...
I'm really thinking you're not bothering to read these posts. Of course we're talking about Freddy Bentivegna. And Freddy Bentivegna would have agreed 100% with what I wrote about intentional scratches. Now, did you read my post or not? I think not.Onepocket73 said:We are talking about Freddy Bentivegna,right?
Fred,Cornerman said:I'm really thinking you're not bothering to read these posts. Of course we're talking about Freddy Bentivegna. And Freddy Bentivegna would have agreed 100% with what I wrote about intentional scratches. Now, did you read my post or not? I think not.
Also, because of your reaction to JRHendry's shot, I have to believe that you don't quite understand it, since you consider it "risky." His shot does the most with the least risk, so you mustn't be understanding his shot.
Fred
mosconiac said:There's a lot of danger up table in this case. Much better to follow jrhendry's guidance.
I wouldn't say you're exactly dead if you get into that zone where the oponent can shoot the three ten combination in the corner. How tight are the pockets? What is this zero zero in the first game? Let him come with that three ten if he wants to. Has he been sitting? How many balls can he get from that combination safely unless he hits it hard?
I would be more likely to come with the "nugget" you drew than shoot the three ten combination it my oponent left me uptable on the end rail.
If I try to leave my oponent on the end rail, instead of the five seven combination hiding the cue ball behind the 13, then I am not going to take a foul and roll it up there, I would feather the six (or thin it with top) and break up that 1, 11, 12, 15 ball crap thats sitting pretty bad for me right now. That could and should free up a few balls for me putting the pressure on him to come with something ballsy if he still even feels like shooting the three ten combination. If he doesn't like the three ten from the end rail his "nugget" shot is also removed.
Eddie
Onepocket73 said:Playing one hole,your opponent has just put you in a serious trap.You are the upper pocket and it's your move.
fan-tum said:Now that I consider your solution, I like your's better. But how many times have we tried to play the 5 into the seven, get a weird kiss, and he runs 4 or 5 or worse. A good asset for a one pocket player is a good memory of past disasters.