Player vs player in a match..and their score is tied, hill hill.
Player A breaks a rule that, by the book, automatically gives him a loss.
Player B, by the book, gets the win and the match
BUT player B doesnt want to win by a technicality and insists on playing the final game anyway.
Question: should a player have the option of insisting that a final game be played, or should a player be "forced" to take the win.
Player A breaks a rule that, by the book, automatically gives him a loss.
Player B, by the book, gets the win and the match
BUT player B doesnt want to win by a technicality and insists on playing the final game anyway.
Question: should a player have the option of insisting that a final game be played, or should a player be "forced" to take the win.