I guess this post is directed mostly at Mr. Griffin, who I have found to be nothing but an upstanding gentleman looking out for the best interests of the game. But I am curious for other thoughts as well.
How is the BCA guaranteeing a fair process for vetting their international team players? Every year, it seems Portugal puts together a team of monsters - and often, more than one team. I find it hard to believe they are all coming out of a single league system (at least as one is defined here in the US).
It really seems as if they are drawing their players from the entire country, and mixing and matching them to get around the Team Master rules. I think a lot of them don't even play the singles so that they never become masters.
It just seems like the Americans have to jump through hoops to put together decent teams, and based on what I see from the international crowd, they are not having the same difficulties.
Thoughts?
- Steve
How is the BCA guaranteeing a fair process for vetting their international team players? Every year, it seems Portugal puts together a team of monsters - and often, more than one team. I find it hard to believe they are all coming out of a single league system (at least as one is defined here in the US).
It really seems as if they are drawing their players from the entire country, and mixing and matching them to get around the Team Master rules. I think a lot of them don't even play the singles so that they never become masters.
It just seems like the Americans have to jump through hoops to put together decent teams, and based on what I see from the international crowd, they are not having the same difficulties.
Thoughts?
- Steve