I am a pool destructor. I work cheap. For the low price of $30 an hour I will destroy your pool game and make you want to take up bowling or knitting.....
...The other night I took second in a tournament. The guy I was playing missed a long straight in where the cue ball was frozen to the rail. After the match I taught him a technique taught to me by Jimmy Reid in 1992 that has worked for me countless times. My opponent was really grateful for the tip. Something he would have never thought of on his own and certainly not something I would have discovered. ...
Here is a tip given to me by Jimmy Reid about 18 years ago that I use to this day.
When your cueball is frozen to the rail you can line up and stroke over the top of the cueball until you feel comfortable then pull the tip back in front of the cueball and shoot.
It really works to keep your stroke straight on those shots.
I have to say, as far as instruction goes there are specialists in different fields. I've never had a paid pool lesson, but when I was growing up I went from instructor to instructor. I had several over the space of around 5 years. One for my fundamentals - stance, grip and cueing action mainly, one for strategy and how to break build, one for aiming and sighting. Its rare to find an instructor that can cover all of the above categories as well as separate instructors. There are some out there, but they're in high demand. I think ex pros, pros and high level amateurs would be best suited to the "strategy" focus point. Who better to tell you how to play a game than someone who has played the game at the highest level. As for aiming and fundamentals my experience in talking with some ex and current pro snooker players is that they struggle explaining why to do something, or how they aim and sight shots. I've been left more confused than anything on these subjects. One prime example is I was talking to a pro snooker player and I asked about his stance, he said let me see your stance and when he did he said do this this and this. When I asked why he replied because that's how I do it...no mention of the fact I'm much taller and completely different shape. His way may have worked wonders for me. But he didn't know why he stood like he did made such a difference to him.
I advise asking around whether locally or on here before you put the money up for instruction and remember just because an instructor has cured your wonky cuing action, doesn't mean they are going to be able to fix your sighting errors for example. You may have to have several coaches before you're ready to take on the world.
Exactly the same. Apart from when using a closed bridge in 14.1. When I'm using a closed bridge I have to have my bridge arm straight so I can turn my wrist out for the cue to slide along the webbing between thumb and index finger, if that makes sense? Because of this my stance closes up slightly and my lead leg goes more in front. Not by much, its fairly subtle.Pidge -- You're a highly skilled player in both snooker and 14.1. Do you use identically the same fundamentals for both games? If not, what differences do you employ?
Exactly the same. Apart from when using a closed bridge in 14.1. When I'm using a closed bridge I have to have my bridge arm straight so I can turn my wrist out for the cue to slide along the webbing between thumb and index finger, if that makes sense? Because of this my stance closes up slightly and my lead leg goes more in front. Not by much, its fairly subtle.
I will use a closed bridge in snooker, always when I'm stuck close to a rail on my left and I can't quite plant my hand down for an open bridge. I tend to bridge really long though when I do this because its too awkward, and the cue is too narrow at my standard bridge length.Do you use an open bridge for all shots in snooker?
In what situations do you use a closed bridge in 14.1?
Thats might nice of you Smooth Stroke, I've never had a fundamentals checkup. I did at one time have an issue with left foot placement that I have since fixed. I know of no other areas in the fundamentals that I have but that doesnt mean there might not be one. I do know I'm pretty consistent with what I do but I dont watch myself so you might see something I dont get a chance to. Im fairly short 5ft 7 and feel a little funny jumping balls sometimes. If I have trouble the jumpshot would be it. I pocket most of my shots.
What I was wanting from the lesson I didnt take, was an advanced lesson I just felt it was a little pricey not really knowing the man. Perhaps I was wrong.
Robin is an advanced player. He might be able to give you lessons.
Your business? So instead of realizing that the person you offered a basic lesson to while at the same time condemning all instructors who charge more than $35 an hour is an advanced player you instead patronized him by offering free lessons as if he is too poor to pay for your cheap ones.You should take a lesson on how to mind your own business. I don't get in yours so please stay out of mine, I have seen where that road leads to.
Everything I read from Robin is always respectful. I am sure he is a grown man and can answer for himself, as he did, again, with respect and class.
I am finished but feel free to get the last word and dig in.
Have a great day
I will use a closed bridge in snooker, always when I'm stuck close to a rail on my left and I can't quite plant my hand down for an open bridge. I tend to bridge really long though when I do this because its too awkward, and the cue is too narrow at my standard bridge length.
In 14.1 I use an open bridge slightly more, but generally use an open bridge mostly. Its hard to say when I use what type bridge. I don't put any thought into it. Often, in cramped situations ill use a closed bridge, but other than that I go with what ever feels right.
Of course and grateful that you did. Man you must have the world's best search technique to be able the find this stuff so fast.John -- you posted this tip of Jimmy's back in 2010, so I think it's OK for me to repeat it here for any readers who missed it and would like to give it a try:
Your business? So instead of realizing that the person you offered a basic lesson to while at the same time condemning all instructors who charge more than $35 an hour is an advanced player you instead patronized him by offering free lessons as if he is too poor to pay for your cheap ones.
Sorry I didn't mean to cost you the opportunity to give a free lesson. Wouldn't want to prevent you from giving your time away to someone who does not need it.
Good thing about pool.....or maybe a bad thing.....is that ANYONE can hang out a sign and be an instructor.
Which is cool with me.....helping people play better pool is a good endeavor even if the "instructor" is not really qualified.
John (not qualified to instruct...tries anyway)
I see your point. Anything of this nature is certainly a risk for the buyer as everyone is at different points in their life and game. The pro could give the same lesson to two different people who are rated at the same level and one could feel it's the worst ever and the other might be praising the lesson to the heavens.
I think that as a person who offers a product you have to decide on a price for your time and have the resolve to stick to it if you feel that's really what you want. Of course you should probably figure out some kind of discount structure or where you can make concessions for other reasons.
For example if I were dealing with someone who is more influential or very active in their community then I am inclined to give them a break because I feel it will pay off in word-of-mouth marketing for me. (provided they get the value they expected).
I honestly think figuring out lesson prices is a bit a voodoo magic. It really does force both the seller and buyer to essentially put a "worth" to a human's time. Essentially you are trading x-amount of your labor hours for x-amount of theirs and when that trade seems out of balance then it's hard to reconcile it.
Sometimes it's just a leap of faith.
Ok, I apologize,I thought from the original post you were talking about an early fundamental lesson. Sounds like you have it dialed in.
Have a great day
One of the most important things I learned as a pool instructor is that everyone is different. Not everyone takes in information the same way. Instructors have to know different ways to communicate information to players.
Having been around and played with pros for many years, I know that most of them are feel players and learn by observation. But there are also some players who are more meticulous in their thinking and need structure in what they do.
Instructors need to recognize how the player they are trying to help assimilates information. For example: You can't force physics down the throat of a player who assimilates information by feel and observation. And many of them don't need it. They can feel what others need to calculate.
If you take a feel player and try to force them into a rigid elbow, you could very well ruin their game. I've seen cookie-cutter type teachers where they are so rigid with their style of teaching that they help some players but hurt others who don't, and never will, think that way.
On the other hand, there are players who require a more academic process to improve. They would respond well to discussions on the physics of the game, and aiming systems, etc. You can see it here in this forum, how different players assimilate information.